We performed a comparison between Brinqa and Ivanti Neurons for RBVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 26th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Avalor and Panaseer, whereas Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM and Vulcan Cyber.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
