Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Tray.io comparison

Boomi and Tray.io are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Boomi is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5, while Tray.io is ranked #74. Boomi holds a 1.5% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Tray.io’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tray.io users who would recommend it.

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Read 6 Boomi AtomSphere Flow reviews

1,368 Views
643 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tray.io

Read 3 Tray.io reviews

826 Views
124 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Tray.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and Tray.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Low-Code Development Platforms Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (29th)

Tray.io

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

74th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (55th), Cloud Data Integration (30th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Boomi AtomSphere Flow	1.5%
Tray.io	0.3%
Other	98.2%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Ankur_Agarwal

associate director at Nagarro

Enhances application integration with scalability, reliability, and security

Boomi AtomSphere Flow facilitates data availability across different departments, allowing our clients to generate diverse analytical reports that aid senior management in making informed decisions. The integration layer ensures data security, which is supported by Boomi's EDA and API management capabilities. The solution unites all these functions, preventing the need for separate products for specific operations.

Read full review

Samuele Sois

Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Marketing A/B tests have gained deeper insights from user behavior and unified global reporting

The best features Tray.io offers include excellent visualization capabilities and a dashboard, which stand out to me the most. I appreciate that it is very easy to convert the data we receive from Tray.io into dashboards from Power BI, which is extremely useful. I would also appreciate if in the future Tray.io provides a way to natively convert the data to Tableau. Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once. As a multinational and very large company, it is definitely beneficial that those of us in the UK can use the same format that colleagues use in India, and the entire data architecture is framed within a trusted system from an established organization. As far as I know, Tray.io has been operating for the last 12 years, making it a very reliable system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue; additionally, it is secure."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."

"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."

"Boomi enhances application integration with scalability, reliability, and security."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility."

"The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities."

"The technical support is rated around 6.5 to seven out of ten. It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness."

"Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility."

"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."

"Its stability could be improved."

"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly."

"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."

"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."

"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive."

"When you use Boomi AtomSphere Flow in production, you have to pay for licenses. The solution is not expensive but it could be cheaper."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

We are working with Cooke Aquaculture, and we use Boomi AtomSphere Flow ( /products/boomi-atomsphere-flow-reviews ) for integration processes. It is specifically used for application-to-application...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tray.io?

It was not always easy to test our changes in Tray.io. In a software engineering context, you might imagine there being different branches and different environments to make changes where you can m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tray.io?

We run automation workflows with Tray.io to take data from our internal databases and update a third-party software that we use. Specifically, my company offers digital trade credit, and we use tha...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?

I think in general it has been a positive experience with Tray.io, and while there are areas where it can be improved, overall it is a good product. I rate Tray.io a seven out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 8% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 7% of the time

Novacura Flow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle BPM vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Competitors

Zapier vs Tray.io

Compared 19% of the time

Workato vs Tray.io

Compared 12% of the time

SnapLogic vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 10% of the time

More Tray.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

March 2026

Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

March 2026

Download Tray.io product report

Also Known As

Boomi Flow

No data available

Overview

Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.

Boomi

The Tray Platform is the leading General Automation Platform, whose modern, serverless architecture empowers users to take full control of their data by automating mission-critical processes and integrating their entire tech stack.

Tray.io

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services

Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.