Bonita vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Bonitasoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bonitasoft is ranked #31, while OpenText is ranked #39. Bonitasoft holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,657 Views
2,816 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

767 Views
721 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bonita

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Bonita and OpenText MBPM compete in the business process management category. Bonita seems to have the upper hand in ease of customization and cost-effectiveness, while OpenText MBPM leads in robust feature offerings and extensive integration capabilities for complex enterprise environments.

Features: Bonita offers flexibility with its low-code development and dynamic business process modeling. It allows rapid deployment and easy customization. OpenText MBPM provides a strong set of features, including integration with extensive enterprise systems, advanced analytics, and robust reporting capabilities. The primary difference rests in Bonita’s user-friendly customization options compared to OpenText MBPM’s advanced analytic abilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita allows quick deployment with comprehensive documentation and a supportive community, which suits businesses looking to get started rapidly. OpenText MBPM, while offering a more tailored deployment with dedicated customer support, may lead to longer setup times but aligns thoroughly with existing enterprise systems. This makes it suited to larger enterprises that prioritize tailored integration.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita has a more affordable cost structure, offering a substantial ROI through reduced development time and adaptable licensing options. In contrast, OpenText MBPM has higher initial setup costs, offset by its advanced features that can yield significant long-term ROI for large-scale deployments. Budget constraints or long-term benefits influence the decision, depending on the complex needs of comprehensive process management.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. OpenText MBPM

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (16th), Process Automation (31st)

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

39th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bonita is 2.0%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bonita	2.0%
OpenText MBPM	0.9%
Other	97.1%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Development of forms and flows."

"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."

"I really enjoy using the workflow management tool."

"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."

"Of the three BPM vendors I evaluated, Bonita was the best in creating forms, ease of customization of forms, and versatility of supported platforms, and it is the only BPM platform that I've seen so far that allows for versioning of artifacts."

"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."

More Bonita pros

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

"OpenText MBPM is a stable solution."

Cons

"We are struggling a bit with integrations."

"The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

"At times Bonita BPM Studio crashes, intermittently."

"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."

"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

"The menus likely would be more intuitive if read in French. Things seem to be under strange headings at times."

More Bonita cons

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 16% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 11% of the time

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 10% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Process Automation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

March 2026

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

March 2026

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Metastorm BPM

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.

OpenText

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. OpenText MBPM

March 2026

Free Report: Bonita vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.