Bonita vs Control-M comparison

Bonitasoft and BMC are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bonitasoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while BMC is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Bonitasoft holds a 4.2% mindshare in PA, compared to BMC’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of BMC users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,086 Views
2,376 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Control-M

Read 126 Control-M reviews

20,716 Views
3,315 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Bonita

Control-M

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Bonita and Control-M are direct competitors in the areas of business process management and workload automation. Control-M appears to gain the upper hand with its robust automation features suitable for complex workflows, which are highly valued in enterprise environments.

Features: Bonita provides a flexible and intuitive drag-and-drop design interface, supports Java integration for solving complex problems, and allows custom process modeling. Control-M, however, offers comprehensive cross-platform scheduling, advanced monitoring, and integration capabilities with various existing technologies like SAP and Hadoop.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could enhance its enterprise-level features, improve integration with legacy systems, and expand its cloud deployment options. Control-M might benefit from optimizing user experience for non-expert users, lowering overall cost for smaller businesses, and providing more readily accessible documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita’s open-source deployment model provides flexibility and broad community support, albeit with potential complexity in setup. Control-M offers a more structured deployment model with dedicated vendor support, ensuring more predictable service levels.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita’s open-source nature results in lower initial costs, favoring businesses with limited budgets. In comparison, Control-M involves a steeper setup cost but aims to deliver substantial value through reduced operational overheads in complex settings, thus justifying its pricing for ROI-focused enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. Control-M Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Control-M

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Process Automation

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (11th), Business Process Management (BPM) (18th)

Control-M

Ranking in Process Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (3rd), Workload Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bonita is 4.2%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 4.6%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

Efficient automation and boosted workflow but needs better integration methods

Control-M is a bit faster compared to other solutions. The job and coding are easier. Also, my DevOps and Ops teams work collaboratively with it, enhancing its efficiency. The workflow is much easier compared to the ACS services we were using. Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."

"I really enjoy using the workflow management."

"The user interface is easy to use."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

More Bonita pros

"Control-M is useful to automate all critical and non-critical processes. Using Control-M, we can automate application workflows as well as file transfers involved in application workflows. We can also use it to run batches related to applications. Automating these processes reduces the RTO and RPO, which helps in the case of failures. It also helps us to identify bottlenecks and take corrective measures."

"It has absolutely saved us time. It has made us more efficient. As far as the processing between systems, we don't have as many people. They have been able to focus on other efforts, because we have been able to automate more stuff with Control-M."

"We can set up automated email notifications to the programmers or the whole team for a particular job. It helps save time because we're not consistently looking at the job to see if it has ended or failed."

"Monitoring is a valuable aspect of it. The monitoring tool is very good, and it is easy for expert and entry level users to use on a short notice."

"The solution is innovative. Specifically for the overseas and time differences, you can feel the efficiency of Batch Impact Manager on jobs, batch processing, and impact management. It works the best on these kinds of issues. It saves us time and money, which is important. We save a lot using Control-M."

"It has certainly helped speed things up."

"It is very stable. We hardly get calls in respect to issues on Control-M, particularly on version 9.0.19."

"The solution has the power to reduce resources, which is good for business. It is constantly updated to remain compatible with new technologies such as Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. It's very easy to take advantage of the compatibilities."

More Control-M pros

Cons

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

"Installation could be made easier."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

More Bonita cons

"There are numerous boxes to tick and things to check to ensure everything is in order before the upgrade happens. The process is very long"

"I would like to see more audit report templates added, and perhaps more customizability in terms of reporting."

"The Control-M API does not support SQL database-type jobs, where a job has been configured to use the SQL catalog to locate SSIS."

"There can be some complexities with the UI part, especially with the advanced features."

"Control-M could benefit from incorporating AI features for better job scheduling."

"The initial setup was complex, because I wasn't used to it."

"Control-M reporting is a bit of a pain point right now. Control-M doesn't have robust reporting. I would like to see better reporting options. I would like to be able to pull charts or statistics that look nicer. Right now, we can pull some data, but it is kind of choppy. It would be nicer to have enterprise-level reporting that you can present to managers."

"The report form and display function are weak; they are not very powerful."

More Control-M cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"The product price is reasonable. I rate the pricing an eight."

"This is now from my previous years as support for banks and big companies. If it's not enterprise scale, I find that it's too expensive for smaller companies. You really have to be quite big and need to have a dedicated support staff to run it, then you'll be fine. What we've seen at smaller companies, it's too expensive because they want to automate everything. Now, stuff that can literally run once a day for the rest of their lives is costing them $3 a job a day. It becomes too expensive, eventually. They are not seeing the return on investment because it's not business critical. Nobody is going to die or they're going to lose money if that job didn't run exactly at 11 minutes past 4:00. It's definitely for bigger enterprise companies, especially banks or healthcare providers. We have had an instance where Control-M was unavailable due to external factors for 20 minutes and there was a loss of almost a million euros because the solution involved logistics."

"Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."

"BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."

"This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."

"It depends. It's packaged in such a way that you can buy the base model without all of the fancy stuff. You can try and keep your price similar to competitors. I guess it's natural throughout the world. It doesn't matter whether you're buying cell phones or something else. The best cell phone will always be more expensive."

"Pricing varies depending on which components and modules you are using."

"The pricing of Control-M is reasonable."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

Its cost can be more competitive. One of the main things customers look at is the cost. It's not affordable. The cost is very high, according to my customers. The licensing cost is very high, and t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 46% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 13% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 13% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

August 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

August 2025

Download Control-M product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Control M

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Bonitasoft

BMC

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Control-M by BMC offers orchestration for hybrid cloud workflows, starting at $29,000 annually. It's designed for teams managing dependencies efficiently with automation and scheduling capabilities.

Control-M is known for its automation, integration, and scheduling capabilities. It provides a user-friendly GUI for seamless third-party application integration and robust file transfer capabilities. Role-based administration features, self-service portals, and the ability to handle complex workflows enhance operational efficiency. Its control modules enable diverse integrations, while forecasting, monitoring, and alerting functionalities improve reliability and adaptability across platforms, making it essential for orchestrating tasks efficiently.

What are Control-M's key features?

User-Friendly GUI: Offers intuitive interface for easy navigation.
Seamless Third-Party Integration: Facilitates smooth interaction with other tools.
Robust File Transfer: Ensures reliable and secure data movement.
Role-Based Administration: Enhances security and access control.
Self-Service Portal: Enables users to manage tasks independently.
Forecasting and Monitoring: Provides predictive insights for better planning.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual tasks.
Improved Reliability: Minimizes errors with automated workflows.
Real-Time Insights: Offers visibility into job performance and system status.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs.
Integration Flexibility: Supports diverse applications and environments.

Control-M is vital in industries like financial services, data management, and IT operations. It automates batch processing, job automation, and file transfers, supporting applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Informatica. This enhances transparency, reduces errors, and provides insights into job performance and system status.

BMC

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Control-M

July 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. Control-M

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. Control-M and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. Control-M report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.