Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

Board vs IBM Planning Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Board International Logo
3,073 views|2,224 comparisons
IBM Logo
4,223 views|2,628 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Board and IBM Planning Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics report (Updated: September 2022).
632,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are the reporting and the charts. The reporting functionality is handy for aggregation, when it comes to planning. That ability is fascinating and our users are very happy with it. The charts and the reporting allow our users to see all the data and to see how things are going this year or in the COVID situation. They're seeing everything. Instead of having to check data line by line, they're seeing it in a graph and they're seeing it in charts.""It is very easy to use. It has got what they call a toolkit, which is a no-code development environment. You can develop a whole solution with it because it is a complete platform. There is a lot of online material that can be used as a reference. You can help yourself while developing a solution. There are some prebuilt applications in the platform environment. You can very easily customize and integrate these applications. It also has flexible scaling of machine resources, which is really great.""By using Board we can do a lot of free analysis. We can change the layout of a table and even the end-user can change the layout of a table. And in Board 11.2 you can save the layout. That's very useful for the customer, it's a very good function."

More Board Pros →

"The flexibility of IBM Planning Analytics is a great feature of this solution. The design flexibility with data rules and defining calculations The ability to combine online and offline calculations are a benefit. Additionally, the forecasting features and predictive analytics is very good.""Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick.""A lot of the platform is in-memory, so Planning Analytics can run calculations quite fast. It also offers several user interfaces. And in the newest version of Planning Analytics, there is a new one called the Planning Analytics Workspace. Maybe it could be useful for the business side.""The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you can't do with spreadsheets""All the different platforms are well integrated."

More IBM Planning Analytics Pros →

Cons
"It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite difficult to figure out what you're supposed to do, and you have to look at a lot of videos before you actually understand, which is a bit frustrating. Their training can be more comprehensive.""Some of our users are still using an MS Office add-in for Excel for certain calculations, and when they export from Board, some of the values, some of the totals and column names, are not coming through into Excel.""What could be better is the manual... nowadays, most people use a web client, but on the Board manual website, a lot of the information is only about the Windows client. If they could update that, it would be helpful."

More Board Cons →

"It is a bit expensive, but it does the job.""It's highly competitive right now, and all the vendors are in a race to put out new versions with additional features. IBM comes out with new versions too often, and it has an impact on quality.""The new frontend Planning Analytics Workspace is not very good, it could be improved. I like the Planning Analytics functionality but it would be helpful if it could be more customizable. You can create a prediction and receive information but you cannot do feature engineering regarding the predictive models. If this was added it would be helpful.""Extracting data is a little slow.""It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit."

More IBM Planning Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."
  • More Board Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."
  • "It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."
  • More IBM Planning Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
    632,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and… more »
    Top Answer:It is very easy to use. It has got what they call a toolkit, which is a no-code development environment. You can develop a whole solution with it because it is a complete platform. There is a lot of… more »
    Top Answer:It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite… more »
    Top Answer:The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you… more »
    Top Answer:It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for.
    Top Answer:It is a bit expensive, but it does the job.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,073
    Comparisons
    2,224
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    745
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    4,223
    Comparisons
    2,628
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1
    Learn More
    Overview

    BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

    BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

    IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

    Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

    Offer
    Learn more about Board
    Learn more about IBM Planning Analytics
    Sample Customers
    Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB
    ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government21%
    Healthcare Company21%
    Pharma/Biotech Company5%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise41%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.
    632,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Board is ranked 6th in Business Performance Management with 4 reviews while IBM Planning Analytics is ranked 4th in Business Performance Management with 5 reviews. Board is rated 9.0, while IBM Planning Analytics is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Board writes "Integration with SAP has helped with process optimization, with all data and reports in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Planning Analytics writes "High-performing, helps clients save time in budget processes ". Board is most compared with Anaplan, Microsoft BI, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau and Oracle OBIEE, whereas IBM Planning Analytics is most compared with Microsoft BI, SAP Analytics Cloud, Jedox, Oracle Hyperion and XLCubed. See our Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics report.

    See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

    We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.