BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs CloudCheckr comparison

BMC Helix and Spot - A Flexera company are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. BMC Helix is ranked #35, while Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. BMC Helix holds a 1.3% mindshare in CCM, compared to Spot - A Flexera company’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Spot - A Flexera company users who would recommend it.

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

Read 2 BMC Helix Continuous Optimization reviews

546 Views
300 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 10 CloudCheckr reviews

1,220 Views
622 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization and CloudCheckr compete in cloud management. BMC Helix is preferred for its comprehensive pricing and support, while CloudCheckr offers advanced features, justifying higher costs.

Features: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization provides rich analytics capabilities with a focus on resource optimization, capacity management, and predictive analytics. CloudCheckr offers extensive cost management features, security posture assessment, and compliance functionalities. CloudCheckr’s features deliver superior data visibility and governance controls, presenting a more complete cloud management solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Helix offers streamlined SaaS deployment and is known for responsive support, enabling quick workflow integration. CloudCheckr provides versatile deployment options with SaaS and on-premise solutions but is seen as more complex to set up. However, CloudCheckr balances this with strong customer service that aids with complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is lauded for its competitive pricing and cost-effectiveness, providing substantial ROI through efficient resource management. CloudCheckr, although more costly initially, supports enhanced cost savings over time thanks to thorough cost analysis and compliance tools, making it a worthwhile investment for long-term financial benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. CloudCheckr Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. CloudCheckr

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

35th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), IT Operations Analytics (27th)

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (24th), Managed Cloud Services (5th), AI Observability (76th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 3.0%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudCheckr	3.0%
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization	1.3%
Other	95.7%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

Appperf677

Application Performance Mnagement Specialist at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enables us to right-size systems to free up resources, and identify performance problems down to the process level

Since I already have a sneak peek into the next releases, I'm very happy about what's going to be included. I would like to see continued support for the legacy parts of the tool, the old, seasoned parts that are very valuable to me. That is a message I continue to give to BMC: All the new stuff's great, but don't take away this really important stuff. That's my biggest fear, that I might lose some of my old functionality that is still extremely valuable. I want to make sure we don't lose any functionality, and that they just still keep delivering on what they're doing. I don't have anything more to ask than what they're offering.

Read full review

Karan Saini

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

Cost governance has improved and cost visibility now drives daily compliant optimization

CloudCheckr is an excellent tool overall. The feature that stands out is how it enables cost savings and efficiency. The cost visibility and reporting are really valuable, and the dashboard is informative and enables good decision-making. The actionable recommendations are beneficial, such as the auto-generated suggestions for optimization. The built-in security and compliance checks, along with scheduled reports, save a lot of manual effort and keep both engineering and finance teams aligned. CloudCheckr has been great and has helped solve problems by ensuring proper compliance. It does not just show data; it highlights actionable items for cost savings, security improvements, and compliance gaps. Scheduled reports are received on a regular basis according to defined schedules, providing more insights that can be shared with leadership and finance teams to ensure alignment. This results in a better picture where everyone is aligned and focused on growth while effectively and efficiently using financial resources. CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production. It has significantly reduced manual efforts that would otherwise be spent manually checking costs, tracking where spending is occurring, and verifying whether everything is properly optimized.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Workload characterization is super important because it lets us figure things out. Many people know, for example, that with Microsoft Word, Word.exe is the executable. Everybody knows their executable, but they don't always know what it does. It also launches other things. This tool has the ability and insight to track those things, and to know: "Oh, you wanted this executable, but this one started this, so you must want this, too." And it tells you what it had to add, what it was using or was spawning."

"The most interesting feature is certainly the simulation of the load using different servers or different KPI parameters of the business."

"We ingest a ton of business data. We are an insurance company and we have business data, like how many quotes are done an hour, and how many policies are sold per hour. The correlation engine in the new TrueSight Capacity Optimization components are wonderful. We can do correlation analysis over months of data, and then we run models to tell our business: 'If you do 1,000 more quotes an hour, we're going to have to upgrade, and we're going to need this much more hardware.'"

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production."

More CloudCheckr pros

Cons

"The memory management of Java application servers should be implemented to be able to size GC and footprint."

"Some of the data management is painful. Some of the new features haven't been implemented in quite the way I would like to get to levels of detail. For example, Visualizer parser doesn't take everything it should out of the Visualizer files. We've had to put in a work-around, but the work-around is not as accurate as what's in the file."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

More CloudCheckr cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Right now, the licensing structure is by server. Everybody is licensed somewhat differently, depending on how big they are, how many licenses they have."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is fantastic.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

An area where CloudCheckr can be improved is pricing. There are no other improvements needed for CloudCheckr that I haven't mentioned.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText Cloud Optimizer vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 18% of the time

Precisely Capacity Management vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 18% of the time

ITRS Capacity Planner vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 18% of the time

DX Performance Management vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 14% of the time

More BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 9% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 7% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer

December 2025

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization report

Download BMC Helix Continuous Optimization product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

January 2026

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

BMC Capacity Optimization, TrueSight Capacity Optimization, BMC Helix Optimize, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is a comprehensive performance and capacity management solution designed to help enterprises optimize IT resources, enhancing operational efficiency while managing costs effectively.

It provides predictive analytics and modeling capabilities, allowing businesses to meet evolving demands seamlessly. By proactively identifying resource constraints and predicting future trends, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization assists organizations in aligning IT resources with business objectives. This strategic approach ensures optimized performance, resource allocation, and cost management with enhanced insights.

What are the key features of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?

Predictive Analytics: Utilizes advanced algorithms to forecast future resource requirements.
Capacity Planning: Facilitates strategic planning to manage capacity effectively.
Anomaly Detection: Identifies unusual patterns that could impact performance.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides insights with tailored views for better decision-making.

What benefits can be expected from BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?

Cost Reduction: Optimizes resource usage to lower operational costs.
Increased Efficiency: Enhances productivity by aligning resources with demand.
Improved Forecasting: Accurate predictions help with strategic planning.
Risk Mitigation: Early detection of performance issues reduces downtime.

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is leveraged by industries like financial services, healthcare, and telecommunications to ensure resource efficiency. These sectors benefit from predictive modeling and capacity planning capabilities, enabling them to adapt to fast-changing conditions while maintaining optimal performance.

BMC Helix

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot - A Flexera company

Sample Customers

Dilliard's

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. CloudCheckr

December 2025

Free Report: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. CloudCheckr

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. CloudCheckr report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.