BlazeMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud are two prominent tools competing in the performance testing category. BlazeMeter often holds an advantage in terms of pricing and customer support, which users find appealing. However, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is frequently considered superior due to its comprehensive feature set tailored for enterprise users.
Features: BlazeMeter is recognized for its flexibility and ease of use, offering powerful cloud-based capabilities that integrate seamlessly with JMeter and allow realistic user traffic simulations from various global locations. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers extensive protocol support and comprehensive simulation capabilities, making it ideal for large-scale and complex testing scenarios.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter users cite a need for improved load generator provisioning and enhanced reporting customization. They also call for better integration with a wider array of APM tools. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud could improve its pricing structures and add more real-time anomaly detection capabilities. Compatibility with older versions remains a point of concern.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter excels with flexible deployment across public, hybrid, and on-premises clouds, supported by high-quality customer service. Users often praise its responsive and effective support team. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is noted for its efficient public cloud deployment, though it frequently falls behind BlazeMeter in user satisfaction regarding support immediacy.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter is typically more competitively priced and favored for its transparency, aligning well with budget-conscious and agile environments through customizable contracts. Its pay-per-use model highlights its ROI by reducing infrastructure costs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, while potentially more expensive, justifies its cost through robust protocol support, appealing to organizations with extensive testing needs.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
The solution is highly scalable, which is its main feature.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
In-depth analysis tools found in the standalone LoadRunner analysis, such as graph merging and setting granularity, would be beneficial.
I expect an improvement in the cloud location offering to better serve local applications, particularly to enhance testing accuracy for users in regions like Thailand.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
Another valuable aspect is the option to use JMX files, similar to JMeter scripts, with LoadRunner.
Its LoadRunner functionality allows us to record a solution's networking protocol and replay them.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines.
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.