BizTalk Server vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
725 views|308 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
3,771 views|1,590 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BizTalk Server and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.""Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers.""BIzTalk's integration with Visual Studio is the most valuable feature of this product.""The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions.""I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten."

More BizTalk Server Pros →

"The solution's technical support is good.""With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters.""The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""I rate the product's setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy since it is a very easy process.""Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework.""The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.""The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution.""The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros →

Cons
"It's a complex product because you have many degrees of freedom to connect different parts together. Whether it's sensible or not, is up to you, but the machine does allow it. But because of the vast degrees of freedom, it's complex.""The product's deployment can be quicker""BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging.""The deployment could be simplified.""BizTalk is in the past, Microsoft is not going to evolve it any further or add any new features."

More BizTalk Server Cons →

"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously.""Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information.""We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters.""Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use.""I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible.""The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates.""Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required.""It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost will depend on the client's requirements."
  • "BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."
  • More BizTalk Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."
  • "The pricing for this solution is fine."
  • "There are fees in addition to the licensing."
  • "It's not an expensive solution."
  • "Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."
  • "The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."
  • "The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."
  • "The fee for maintenance is costly."
  • More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten.
    Top Answer:BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging.
    Top Answer:You need to consider a modern system instead of BizTalk Server. I rate it a two out of ten.
    Top Answer: It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.
    Top Answer:We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
    Top Answer:Implementing changes and introducing new interfaces in Process Orchestration should have been more straightforward. The current system is burdened with a heavy load and has become overly complex… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    725
    Comparisons
    308
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    653
    Rating
    4.7
    Views
    3,771
    Comparisons
    1,590
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
    Learn More
    Overview
    Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
    Sample Customers
    Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson
    Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company30%
    Wholesaler/Distributor17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    BizTalk Server vs. SAP Process Orchestration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BizTalk Server is ranked 10th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 9 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. BizTalk Server is rated 7.0, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BizTalk Server writes "Helps us implement complex mapping and integration, but deployment could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". BizTalk Server is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, Camunda, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, Bizagi and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and SnapLogic. See our BizTalk Server vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

    See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

    We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.