

Pega Platform and BizTalk Server are both key players in the enterprise software realm, focusing on business process management and system integration, respectively. Pega Platform seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive BPM and case management capabilities, while BizTalk excels in system integrations.
Features: Pega Platform is known for its strong case management, low-code capabilities, and flexibility in deployment configurations. It supports seamless cloud integration and is highly regarded for its rapid prototyping abilities. BizTalk Server offers robust system integration features with a focus on adapter support and orchestration capabilities, which are advantageous in complex integration scenarios.
Room for Improvement: Pega Platform faces challenges with its high licensing costs and complex user interface, which some users find requires advanced expertise. Additionally, its cloud presence and RPA functionalities are not as strong as its competitors. BizTalk Server, on the other hand, requires modernization, as it is primarily an on-premises solution with few modern cloud features. Performance, scalability, and cloud service integration also need enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pega Platform supports diverse deployment options including public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering adaptability for various enterprise sizes. Customer service reviews are mixed, highlighting both helpful support and some delays. BizTalk Server's on-premises nature presents modernization challenges, though customer support is generally positive, despite some users suggesting faster resolution times.
Pricing and ROI: Pega Platform's high initial costs are offset by claims of good ROI through improved process efficiencies, with licensing based on cloud or on-premises deployment needs. BizTalk Server typically offers lower licensing fees but might incur extra expenses for cloud integrations. Users need to ensure full utilization to avoid underutilization leading to wasted investments.
BizTalk Server's ROI is comparatively higher than Boomi and Workato.
Now the direction is to move away from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods, which has more features compared to BizTalk Server.
The technical support from Pega is very low, rating a one or two out of ten.
I never needed support from the platform standpoint, but if additional features are required, we have regular meetings with the product team for feedback.
Pega's technical support team is very helpful.
It is time for low-code, no-code, and a quick go-to-market should be faster.
Currently, big banking providers and insurance providers, even the members for healthcare payers, are using more than millions of operations on a daily or weekly basis.
BizTalk Server is good for small companies but not for big companies.
BizTalk Server's stability rates about eight or nine out of ten.
We initially planned to move to Azure Integration Services, but there are challenges with AIS, so now we are evaluating WebMethods IO.
BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages.
With the recent development of AI agents in Pega Platform 24.2, the adoption is not heavy due to regulations around using external LLM by customers, especially regulated customers in BFSS and healthcare.
Pega introduced Constellation, which allows a user to build a more engaging visual experience.
My learning curve in robotics has been challenging.
The only thing I heard is that it's not inexpensive.
Pega is priced higher than open-source options like Flowable but is suitable for large-scale industries like banking and insurance.
The pricing is expensive, and this is an issue.
From a licensing perspective, it is higher than the competition.
Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market.
BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation.
Management capabilities such as dashboards.
Pega Platform is excellent for enterprise-level solutions with integrations to entire systems, including case management, service orchestration, CRM, decision-making capabilities, digital process automation, and AI-driven functionalities.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Pega Platform | 5.7% |
| BizTalk Server | 1.0% |
| Other | 93.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 69 |
Pega Platform provides flexible business process management with a focus on rapid application development and automation through a low-code approach, enhancing efficiency across sectors.
Pega Platform is renowned for its ability to streamline operations with robust automation features, including robotic process automation and decision-making capabilities. Its intuitive interface and workflow management contribute to a reputation for enhancing business processes. Although users face challenges with integration limitations and high licensing costs, they benefit from rapid deployment and efficient process adaptations. The unified architecture reduces complexity, while case management and integration services support digital transformations in sectors such as banking, insurance, and healthcare.
What are the key features of Pega Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
In industries like insurance, banking, healthcare, and government, Pega Platform is implemented to automate diverse workflows, supporting initiatives from claims processing to customer onboarding. Enterprises use Pega for case management and digital transformations, valuing its out-of-the-box integrations and real-time reporting capabilities to boost operational automation and enhance customer experiences.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.