Binary Defense MDR vs Field Effect MDR comparison

Binary Defense and Field Effect are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Binary Defense is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.4, while Field Effect is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.2. Binary Defense holds a 0.6% mindshare in MDR, compared to Field Effect’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Binary Defense users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Field Effect users who would recommend it.

Binary Defense MDR

Read 16 Binary Defense MDR reviews

3,668 Views
1,761 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Read 31 Field Effect MDR reviews

5,141 Views
5,141 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Binary Defense MDR

Field Effect MDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Binary Defense MDR and Field Effect MDR are major players in the cybersecurity market, each with their unique strengths in threat detection and response. Binary Defense appears to have the upper hand in patient customization and rapid response, while Field Effect is favored for its continuous vigilance and intuitive action recommendations.

Features:Binary Defense MDR boasts seamless integration, swift response times, and unparalleled customization capabilities, providing a strong support system with detailed documentation. Field Effect MDR emphasizes continuous monitoring, including cloud protection, and offers effective notifications coupled with automated responses and actionable recommendations.

Room for Improvement:Binary Defense MDR users seek enhanced language support, better API integration, and expanded SIEM capabilities, citing a need for improved staffing stability and proactive account management. Field Effect MDR users point to desired enhancements in patch management, interface improvements, and more comprehensive third-party integrations, noting deficiencies in DNS coverage and email security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Binary Defense MDR is renowned for excellent customer service and streamlined deployment across various cloud environments, supported by a highly responsive team. Field Effect MDR offers strong support and multi-environment compatibility, though some users note complexities in integrations that could be simplified for smaller clients.

Pricing and ROI:Binary Defense MDR provides competitive pricing viewed as cost-effective compared to in-house security costs, delivering significant ROI through enhanced security posture and reduced resource needs. Field Effect MDR has reasonable pricing, particularly appealing with its user-based model, though justifying the spend can be challenging within tight budget constraints. Both platforms offer value in security monitoring and management, reducing the risk of costly breaches.

To learn more, read our detailed Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Binary Defense MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

3rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Binary Defense MDR is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.2%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Field Effect MDR	3.2%
Binary Defense MDR	0.6%
Other	96.2%

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Rich Ullom

AVP, IT Security Compliance and Audit/Information Security Officer at The Western Reserve Group

Worth the money, fantastic communication, and fast service with an average response time of about four minutes on an alert

This is my third SOC. I have never had anybody react as well. So, it's hard for me to provide something that they could do better because I'm really happy with them. I just signed another three-year contract with them. I don't find any downside to them, but if I have to put one, it would be consistent manpower or staffing. The only area where the solution can be improved is going to be with people. As they grow, they are struggling with the same thing that every other company is, which is getting talent and getting that talent to stay, but they've just revised their tiering system to go from a flat analyst and manager to a three-tier solution where it goes through two or three before it gets elevated. That seems to have worked out well, so if one level misses it, the next one picks it up, and it works out fine. Consistent staffing is the only challenge they have because when you're hiring level-one analysts, you go through them pretty quickly. You'll probably hire them at 50K or 55K, and after they do it for a year, they find out they can make 85K somewhere else, and they bounce. So, their turnover is a little high, but that's it.

Read full review

Anmol Nagpal

Operations Support Specialist at SupportMyMac

Effective MDR with great support and an easy setup

The feature I've found the move valuable is the 24/7 monitoring. We are a small organization that supports a LOT of endpoints and clients. Without this tool, it would be impossible for us to confidently tell clients that we are secure. Alongside this, the ability for Field Effect to make decisions on its own based on what it has learned from all the "training data" that we have provided in the past. It will only get better over time. We have had some false positives; for example, using a legitimate networking scanning tool from the terminal has been blocked. However, we were actually impressed when something so simple was caught!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the SIEM and the ticketing function; the latter is very smooth and easy to read and understand. We don't have any issues looking at the ticketing information when we're trying to identify what's going on."

"With Binary Defense, we don't just get an alert, but also a detailed rundown of why they're alerting us on it. They tell us what was executed, or the username, script, or IP. That way, we're not wasting time investigating."

"Our mean time to response has gone down. We're much faster with direct response and have more investigative capabilities than we did before."

"The most valuable part of Binary Defense is its team of cybersecurity analysts. Their analysts filter out the noise and only forward the critical threats that require a response instead of false positives."

"The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians."

"One of the main benefits of Binary Defense MDR is the ability to easily meet with their support team to discuss any issues we encounter."

"Binary Defense is comprehensive. We see most of the questionable activity. Once you see things a couple of times and are familiar with the processes, you know what those are. The level of activity is definitely favorable."

"Binary Defense's most valuable feature is the 24/7 monitoring and threat hunting. Their team checks the latest breaches and how they're done."

More Binary Defense MDR pros

"It provides valuable insights into our IT environment, enabling us to improve reselling, upgrades, and customer management."

"The standout feature is its continuous 24/7 monitoring of all network traffic, providing unparalleled vigilance."

"Unlike previous solutions, where we were solely informed of security incidents, Covalence's MDR allows for real-time incident prevention."

"The alerts that we get are valuable. It notifies us if there is any attempted access and if there are any areas where we need to create more security for clients. It is stopping anything from happening before there is even an issue."

"It's running in the background and does a packet-level analysis of everything that comes in. It also has an auto-response feature, so if something gets through and is clicked on, or somehow gets through the network, it gets isolated and quarantined, and we get notified."

"The ARO alerts are helpful to use almost daily to get a sense of what actions we need to take to expedite security measures."

"A client of ours with Field Effect MDR is less likely to be a victim of a cyber attack."

"Hackers are trying to breach a business when they least expect it - that's often at night, weekends, and holidays. Covalence never sleeps or misses a second of monitoring."

More Field Effect MDR pros

Cons

"Binary Defense MDR could be even better with additional features, like automatic scans and file quarantine."

"The most significant area for improvement is in support for non-English speakers; we're a global organization, so many of our users are not English speakers, which can make interacting with them a challenge. There's no Chinese language support, so we must rely on what we can do with the internet. We don't expect Binary Defense to build a language staff, but details can get lost in translation when we assume the whole world speaks English."

"I would like to get more reports from Binary Defense about what they're blocking."

"The only area for improvement that I can think of relates to statistical analysis for SLAs. They are in the middle of moving to a new product called D3 which is going to do some backend work for them. I know they are working to improve some of the help desk statistics, such as the time the tickets open and the time they are closed."

"If I were shopping for an MDR solution today, I would not only look for a company that has the ability to alert, detect, and remediate, but also the ability to integrate vulnerability management. That's a big thing that they're lacking today."

"We found that an earlier version of the agent had high memory usage and that was a bit concerning, but we raised the concern with their support team and they immediately replied that they had noticed the same thing and had a candidate fix already available... it totally fixed the issue."

"It's sometimes difficult to know when to engage Binary Defense or TrustedSec, their sister company. TrustedSec is more focused on offensive security, as opposed to the defensive security that the MDR solution provides. It would be awesome if there were a better bridge between that relationship for when we need to get more proactive services or when we need to do a penetration test."

"It's hard to think of anything that they need to improve on, but just to point out something, I would like to see them provide advanced XDR."

More Binary Defense MDR cons

"I would like Covalence to implement patch management as well."

"Field Effect Covalence could benefit from enhancing its packing slip process."

"I'd like improved visibility into the backend data where logs are stored, along with integrations with a wider range of products."

"They could use more third-party integrations with other MSP tools."

"There are tags for security threats, but I only view them. I do not action anything. I just see what is happening. Sometimes, they are a little bit vague, and I am unsure what they mean, so I leave that to the IT experts. Overall, we are quite satisfied with their product and how it is working."

"I'd suggest that Field Effect focus more on including things like phishing simulation and cybersecurity training."

"Field Effect MDR could broaden its cloud application integrations to integrate better with Office 365, Azure, Salesforce, etc. They integrate about 15 to 20 out of the box. I'd love to see a lot more than that."

"Covalence's SEAS feature wasn't very user-friendly."

More Field Effect MDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is spot on; if anything, it's slightly below the norm for most services. Compared to building the same team internally, it would cost more to create the same amount of capability than what we get from an external team. Price-wise, Binary Defense is in a great spot."

"The pricing is very good. They are definitely competitive and they were lower at the time that we went with them."

"The pricing is on target. Working with their sales team on pricing negotiations was a pleasant process. They were very respectful of the constraints we had and I feel that we're paying a fair price."

"The pricing isn't that bad, it's very competitive. I don't feel that it's over-priced and I don't feel that it's under-priced."

"After we acquired this platform, we met with a number of different vendors. Binary Defense came in with a proposal that was surprisingly affordable. In fact, we were able to recoup the cost of their services within a short period of time. This is because Binary Defense is able to provide the same level of security as a team of two or three in-house analysts but at a fraction of the cost. As a result, Binary Defense is saving us an estimated $250,000 to $300,000 per year."

"Binary Defense MDR is priced competitively and may be slightly lower than CrowdStrike."

"It's valued at the right price. Even with the number of endpoints we have, we don't feel that it's a lot more than any competitor. In fact, it might be less expensive when you look at the fact that you're getting a full flex SOC out of it along with the tools."

"It has been good. We have saved money, and we have a better product."

More Binary Defense MDR pricing and cost advice

"It is a little pricey. It is a little on the high end, but we are continuing to use it. We signed the contract and have not canceled, so we find value in having it."

"We were particularly impressed with their pricing model, which charges per user rather than per system."

"It is on the high end, but it is worth it for the service that you get from them."

"While the contract duration might change, the pricing remains highly attractive."

"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."

"The pricing isn't sized, so Field Effect doesn't make it easy for anything under 25 users. I'm not crazy about that."

"The shift to a per-user pricing model and the introduction of a base price for the on-premises or virtual appliance has been particularly advantageous."

"The pricing is fair and reasonable."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

49%

Retailer

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Binary Defense MDR?

The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Binary Defense MDR?

It has been good. We have saved money, and we have a better product. We are a company that has become an enterprise from a small medium business in two years. Our company passed a certain dollar ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Binary Defense MDR?

We are going to have a meeting with them the following Monday. It will be our first quarterly business review. Half of it is going to be looking at new products and new functions that they are brin...

See all answers

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

Pricing was initially a concern, but the recent updates have resolved that by offering a more accessible buying cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

One way Field Effect MDR can be improved is through its licensing process, which is not ideal. The licensing process is difficult because I have to access a separate website to complete it.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 28% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 28% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 23% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 21% of the time

More Binary Defense MDR Competitors

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 29% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 11% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 9% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Binary Defense MDR

October 2025

Download Binary Defense MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

October 2025

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Also Known As

Binary Defense Vision, Binary Defense Managed Detection and Response, Binary Defense Managed Detection & Response

Field Effect Covalence

Overview

Binary Defense provides a Managed Detection and Response service using an Open XDR strategy that detects and isolates threats early in the attack lifecycle. Expert security analysts in the Binary Defense Security Operations Center leverage an attacker’s mindset, monitoring your environments for security events 24x7x365 and acting as an extension of your security teams. When a security event occurs, Binary Defense analysts triage, disposition, and prioritize the event. Analysts conduct full kill chain analysis and supply tactical and strategic mitigation recommendations to your security team with the goal of increasing your organization’s security posture against the latest adversary threats.

Visit us online at https://www.binarydefense.com

Binary Defense

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Field Effect

Sample Customers

Securitas USA, Black Hills Energy, Lincoln Electric,The J.M. Smuckers Company, New York Community Bank, State of Connecticut, NCR

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR

September 2025

Free Report: Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.