We performed a comparison between Betty Blocks and CucumberStudio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The most valuable feature is the back end."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"In many cases, they make choices where flexibility is a little bit degraded, but if you leave everything open and the flexibility is great then the usability is a little bit less."
"What I find lacking in the software is its ability to query the database."
"I would like to see full integration with AI."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I would like to see better customer support."
Betty Blocks is ranked 27th in Rapid Application Development Software with 2 reviews while CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews. Betty Blocks is rated 7.6, while CucumberStudio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Betty Blocks writes "The solution is stable and has good support, but is expensive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". Betty Blocks is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps and Mendix, whereas CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.