Bacula Enterprise vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Bacula Systems and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Bacula Systems is ranked #28 with an average rating of 10.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. Bacula Systems holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

4,976 Views
3,185 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 359 HPE Zerto Software reviews

24,233 Views
13,813 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

HPE Zerto Software and Bacula Enterprise compete in enterprise backup and disaster recovery. HPE Zerto Software tends to offer better pricing and support, whereas Bacula Enterprise is favorable for those needing extensive capabilities through comprehensive features.

Features: HPE Zerto Software provides rapid data recovery, real-time ransomware detection, and seamless disaster recovery management for virtual environments. Its near-synchronous replication supports multi-cloud environments, helping to protect virtual machines effectively. Bacula Enterprise offers advanced data protection and scalability with features such as special plugins for different platforms, ease of use across various environments, and transparent licensing.

Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could benefit from fuller orchestration support without reducing services for Hyper-V, as it is currently focusing on HPE VME. Improved support for on-premises scenarios is needed due to reliance on external analytics. HPE Zerto's real-time monitoring capabilities still need enhancement for better market competitiveness. Bacula Enterprise could improve with additional streamlined documentation, more responsive customer support, and possibly easier initial setup and configuration to facilitate deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software ensures a straightforward deployment with extensive technical support, providing a quick setup process and reliable customer service. Bacula Enterprise has more intricate setup requirements but is complemented by comprehensive documentation and responsive customer service for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software offers a cost-effective solution for budget-conscious businesses, providing quick ROI through efficient recovery and minimal downtime. While Bacula Enterprise comes with a higher initial setup cost, its versatile and scalable features justify the investment by offering significant returns in the long run.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

28th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

19th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

2nd

Ranking in Cloud Backup

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

359

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 1.8%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	1.8%
Bacula Enterprise	1.0%
Other	97.2%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

reviewer2802231

Dev Ops Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"Bacula Enterprise, so far, has never let us down with their service and support."

"The most valuable feature is the support for Linux servers."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"The most valuable feature is its ease of use; it works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

More Bacula Enterprise pros

"The ease of setting up replication, the speed, and the ease with which I can fail over and fail back are all excellent aspects of the solution."

"The solution has helped me reduce downtime in situations where, during a weather event, we were able to maintain 100% of our operations."

"The live failover tests and point-in-time recovery options have been exceptionally valuable features of Zerto for our organization."

"We did the PoC against five other products, and no one could touch Zerto on the technical side of it, at all, and that's besides the ease of use."

"I am quite familiar with the user interface. It is easy for me to operate and perform different operations because I am an experienced user. In my opinion, the user interface is easy to understand and operate. The user interface is user-friendly."

"Don't underestimate how good it feels to rollback data instantly."

"The core functionality is what's beautiful about it."

"Compared with Sybase replication, Zerto is very user-friendly and when we need to failback or move workloads, it decreases both the number of highly skilled people involved and the time it takes to complete."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"Relying solely on a desktop is a bit frustrating as its GUI isn't exactly responsive."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."

"The interface needs to be easier for adding new devices to be managed."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

More Bacula Enterprise cons

"In Zerto for vSphere, it is a pain to remove the virtual appliance if for some reason you lose the host."

"Zerto needs to improve its support for VMware Lifecycle Manager."

"It would be good if we could store a snapshot of the images coming through so that we can always go back and have a vision history."

"One improvement that could make it easier would be to have an easier way to track journal usage and a little bit more training around journal sizing. I've done all the training and the journal is still a gray area. There is confusion surrounding how it's billed and how we should bill clients. It would be easier if it had billing suggestions or billing best practices for our clients to make sure that we're not leaving money on the table."

"Sometimes the virtual private group that is created in HPE Zerto Software is sluggish."

"But, if you don't have other tools to also help protect you from ransomware, Zerto by itself may not be sufficient."

"When it comes to a solution, one of the things the management wants is to standardize platforms. That's why when Rubrik came out with their solution, they wanted to look at it. For instance, if you have multiple technologies, you're going to need admins to manage all those different ones. I would like Zerto to be something that fits all our needs, including the backup that Rubrik provides, but I understand that not all solutions can be that way."

"I had a couple of questions after deployment, but nothing major, about a couple of ways I could tweak it."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

"It's expensive, for sure, but for us, it comes down to the fact that we do not replicate our entire environment using Zerto. We replicate the mission-critical servers and services, so the yearly cost of Zerto is heavily outweighed by the potential cost of an outage."

"Zerto is like a Ferrari. It's very fast but not the cheapest solution. You're paying a high price for quality and the assurance that you will have the environment up and steady."

"The licensing costs are not cheap. It is kind of an expensive product. However, I am a get-what-you-pay-for kind of person. After using this product, I can understand why the licensing costs are high."

"In general, it's pretty fair because it is software. In our case, we built our own colo. So, the cost of the colo was very expensive, and that's where a lot of the equipment is. The same thing is there if we were going to spin up in the cloud, but as a solution, in general, it's pretty fair for what you get out of it and how it works. It's not cheap, but at the same time, you get what you pay for, and it's definitely worth the cost. You just have to understand that the cost of the software alone is not the total cost of the project of doing ransomware protection or disaster recovery. It's a piece of the pie, not the entire pie."

"The pricing is top tier but offers good value."

"It is expensive."

"You need to figure out how many critical servers and applications you have in your environment so you will know how many Zerto licenses to buy."

"The licensing cost is fair."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	94
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	206

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

HPE Zerto Software's GUI needs modernization to match the flexibility and user experience of other HPE software solutions, as there is still room for improvement in software-level flexibility and t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

August 2026

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

August 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Bacula Enterprise offers robust backup solutions with extensive plugins for services like SAP HANA and Microsoft SQL, supporting multi-platform environments. It's valued for scalability, transparent licensing, and effective data recovery.

Bacula Enterprise serves organizations with diverse IT landscapes by providing scalable backup solutions tailored for platforms like Linux servers. Its extensive documentation and community support ensure smooth operation and reliability. Users appreciate features including deduplication, compression, and centralized management, contributing to efficient data protection for industries such as banking and healthcare. The setup process can be complex for some, and there is demand for a more intuitive interface, improved mobile support, and better GUI functionality. Despite initial setup challenges, Bacula Enterprise remains a trusted tool for data management with flexible resource utilization and security features.

What are the key features of Bacula Enterprise?

Extensive Plugins: Supports SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL, enhancing integration.
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across different IT environments.
Scalability: Adapts to growing organizational needs efficiently.
Transparent Licensing: Offers cost-effective solutions with clear pricing.
Data Deduplication: Optimizes storage by eliminating redundant data.
Centralized Management: Streamlines data handling processes across systems.

What benefits should users seek in reviews of Bacula Enterprise?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex backup procedures for technical teams.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes efficiency in data storage and retrieval.
Reliable Data Recovery: Ensures data can be restored effectively when needed.
Versatile Configuration: Supports easy customization for specific needs.

In sectors like banking, healthcare, and government, Bacula Enterprise handles large data volumes and secures backup tasks with encryption. Its multi-platform support is crucial for heterogeneous systems, executing scheduled tasks and data protection protocols efficiently, while fulfilling industry-specific compliance and reliability requirements.

Bacula Systems

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software

August 2026

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.