Bacula Enterprise vs Dell CloudBoost comparison

Bacula Systems and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Bacula Systems is ranked #18 with an average rating of 10.0, while Dell Technologies is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.0. Bacula Systems holds a 2.3% mindshare in CB, compared to Dell Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Dell Technologies users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

1,501 Views
1,289 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Dell CloudBoost

Read 2 Dell CloudBoost reviews

288 Views
190 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

Dell CloudBoost

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and Dell CloudBoost compete in the data backup and recovery solutions category. Bacula Enterprise is more cost-effective and flexible, whereas Dell CloudBoost is preferred for its robust features and comprehensive data protection.

Features: Bacula Enterprise is built on an open-source framework that allows extensive customization, scalability, and multi-platform support, suitable for diverse IT environments. Dell CloudBoost integrates with Dell EMC's data protection suite, offering seamless data access, enhanced security, and efficient cloud resource management. The key distinction is Bacula’s adaptability versus Dell CloudBoost’s integration strength.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bacula Enterprise has a straightforward deployment with flexible, scriptable options, backed by community-driven support. Dell CloudBoost is efficiently deployed within the Dell EMC ecosystem, complemented by professional, dedicated support. The main difference is Bacula's flexible setup compared to Dell’s structured, support-focused model.

Pricing and ROI: Bacula Enterprise has a lower initial setup cost and provides high ROI due to reduced operational expenses from its open-source nature. Dell CloudBoost, despite a higher upfront investment, offers a strong ROI through advanced features and seamless integration, appealing to enterprises with significant data protection needs. The key contrast is Bacula's cost-efficiency against Dell CloudBoost’s feature-driven value.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. Dell CloudBoost Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Dell CloudBoost

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Cloud Backup

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (25th)

Dell CloudBoost

Ranking in Cloud Backup

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 2.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell CloudBoost is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

Saleh-Khakwani

Senior Technical Consultant at DWP Technologies

Stable solution with a wider boost functionality, helping us eliminate the tape backup requirements

We use the solution to protect the applications running in the cloud or on-premises. Its wider boost functionality helps us eliminate the tape backup requirements The solution's most valuable feature is throttling the applications as per the bandwidth. Using it, we can adapt a method to work on…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"My customer has Dell EMC CloudBoost integrated with all of their other Dell products. It integrates well."

"The solution's support team is excellent."

Cons

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"They should eliminate the tape-out function from the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

"Its cost depends upon the amount of data that needs to be protected."

"The price of Dell EMC CloudBoost could be reduced, it is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 51% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

April 2025

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

April 2025

Download Dell CloudBoost product report

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

With Dell CloudBoost, products of Dell Data Protection Suite, Including Dell NetWorker, Dell Avamar and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, are optimized for enterprise applications running in public cloud environments. CloudBoost is available with Data Protection Suite.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Dell CloudBoost

April 2025

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. Dell CloudBoost

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. Dell CloudBoost and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. Dell CloudBoost report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.