Azure Monitor vs Workspace ONE Intelligence comparison

Microsoft and Omnissa are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Omnissa is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 6.0% mindshare in APM, compared to Omnissa’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Omnissa users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews

12,653 Views
12,020 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Read 3 Workspace ONE Intelligence reviews

253 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Workspace ONE Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Workspace ONE Intelligence Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. Workspace ONE Intelligence

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

44th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile APM (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 6.0%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workspace ONE Intelligence is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed

The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.

Read full review

Muhammad JunaidJawed

Sr. VDI Engineer at Afiniti.com

Helps to find devices that are lost but improvement is needed in mapping

The tool's deployment is easy. There are lots of documents and support available online. I help deploy Workspace ONE Intelligence. It's not hard to deploy since we've done it many times. We use the on-premises solution now. Basic deployment takes one day, but adding features like tunneling takes an extra day. The main challenge is network connectivity. The documentation is good and available online.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support is helpful."

"The most valuable functions of Azure Monitor for our clients are its ability to monitor CPU usage and detect any potential issues before they escalate into actual problems. This helps in proactively addressing issues and preventing disruptions in our services. Additionally, Azure Monitor's integration with Azure for implementation has been quite straightforward and easy to manage."

"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."

"Technical support is good and helpful...The initial setup is easy."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"I use the solution to monitor the infrastructure and applications."

"The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."

"The dashboard allows us to easily track various metrics and quickly understand the overall health of our system."

More Azure Monitor pros

"I would rate Workspace ONE Intelligence nine out of ten."

"Integration is also very easy."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its tunneling capability. It is good for inventory, encryption, device location, and kiosk mode. If a device is lost, you can find it. We integrated it with a third-party tool for one-time passwords and two-factor authentication. The user-friendly interface makes device management easy."

Cons

"have used multiple products like Webex and PRTG. Some features could be added. Azure Monitor should add SMS and APIs. We have very limited access to Azure Monitor. I usually get alerts on my phone when they are integrated with Slack. I am not always available, but my team is. Sometimes, I am traveling and don't have access to my email, but I have Slack and other third-party projects that send me instant messages if a sensor goes down."

"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring."

"The query builder could be better. In comparison to other monitoring tools, in order to use Azure Monitor, your engineers need to have KQL experience. If they don't, it's not intuitive as a system."

"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs."

"The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners."

"What I feel is when I open a screen of Azure, some places are very complex to navigate to. It is not very user-friendly when it comes to accessing certain sections."

"The onboarding process of certain assets and the overall UI can be improved in Azure Monitor"

"Setting up this solution is complex. It's also missing the functionality of assigning alerts."

More Azure Monitor cons

"Windows devices management needs improvement."

"One area for improvement is location mapping - it uses Bing Maps instead of Google Maps, which isn't always up to date. Device enrollment can also be challenging, especially for older devices that need a factory reset."

"Support could be improved for Workspace, especially the technical part, and it needs to ensure that issues can be resolved within one or two days."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."

"The product offers a pay-as-you-go model to users. The charges are to be paid according to the usage of the product."

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

"It's a costly solution"

"Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."

"The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."

"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."

"The licensing is a monthly fee."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

"The solution is cost-effective. Workspace ONE Intelligence is neither cheap nor expensive. Compared to other tools like MaaS360, it Is more cost-effective. It costs about seven dollars per user, while others might cost $50—a big difference."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workspace ONE Intelligence?

Workspace ONE Intelligence comes under a separate cost when purchasing UEM. There is price sensitivity in India compared to other solutions currently occupying the AirWatch, so pricing needs to be ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workspace ONE Intelligence?

Workspace ONE Intelligence comes under a separate cost if you purchase UEM, making it a useful tool. The current features available in Workspace ONE Intelligence meet all use cases, so there isn't ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workspace ONE Intelligence?

Predictive analysis hasn't been used, as there have been no customer use cases requiring it. Workspace ONE Intelligence offers flexibility in configuration, requiring only UEM integration if data n...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 21% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 50% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 26% of the time

New Relic vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 24% of the time

More Workspace ONE Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

August 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

Download Workspace ONE Intelligence product report

Also Known As

No data available

Apteligent, Crittercism

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Get insights, guidelines, and preferred outcomes that will help you deliver the best possible mobile experience for your customers and help make your mobile business successful like never before.

When milliseconds can cost you millions, Apteligent reveals operational and usage trends, uncovers issues, and analyzes behaviors. This allows you to continuously improve apps, keep users happy, and put your mobile business at the top of its game.

Omnissa

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

AT&T, Bloomberg, CNN, Experian, Fox, JC Penny, Urban Outfitters, Nokia, Lutron, NASCAR, T-Mobile, Urban Engines, Microsoft, Lego

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. Workspace ONE Intelligence

July 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. Workspace ONE Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Workspace ONE Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. Workspace ONE Intelligence report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.