Azure Monitor vs Sysdig Monitor comparison

Microsoft and Sysdig are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Sysdig is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 6.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to Sysdig’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Sysdig users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews

5,343 Views
2,687 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Sysdig Monitor

Read 3 Sysdig Monitor reviews

125 Views
22 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

Sysdig Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Sysdig Monitor and Azure Monitor are competitors in the cloud monitoring industry. Azure Monitor often has the upper hand due to its robust feature set, despite potentially higher costs.

Features: Sysdig Monitor provides container visibility, integration with Kubernetes, and insights into containerized environments. Azure Monitor offers cloud service integrations, analytics capabilities, and cloud infrastructure monitoring. Azure's broader feature set makes it more versatile.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sysdig Monitor allows straightforward deployment in containerized environments but lacks Azure's extensive support. Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly into the Azure ecosystem, supported by robust documentation and comprehensive support, resulting in a smoother user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Sysdig Monitor appeals to organizations seeking container-specific monitoring with competitive pricing. Azure Monitor's pricing tends to be higher because of its expansive features, but it is justified by the potential ROI from comprehensive cloud monitoring capabilities. Azure's perceived value may outweigh costs for organizations prioritizing extensive features and integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Sysdig Monitor Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. Sysdig Monitor

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (5th)

Sysdig Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

33rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (9th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 6.2%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sysdig Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed

The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.

Read full review

Md. Olid Hasan Bhuiyan

Site Reliability Engineer at ReliSource

Provides a good view of the sequence and offers in-depth visibility into my infrastructure

I needed to identify the sequence and frequency of system calls for a specific system. Sysdig provided this information readily. However, analyzing frequency proved more challenging. As far as I know, Sysdig Monitor lacks functionality to directly obtain system call frequency for certain files. Therefore, I had to capture a screenshot of the relevant data from Sysdig Monitor and then manually extract the text. A built-in Sysdig feature to retrieve system call frequency for specific website actions would greatly enhance its usefulness. I had difficulty installing Sysdig Monitor on Windows.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."

"You can scale the product."

"Some good integration capabilities are present in the tool."

"Technical support is good and helpful...The initial setup is easy."

"Technical support is helpful."

"It has good troubleshooting features."

"One of the most useful aspects of this solution is the out-of-the-box functionality on all areas, especially on Application Insights, zero instrumentation, and artificial intelligence for event correlation."

"Provides an overview and high-level information."

More Azure Monitor pros

"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."

"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."

"Sysdig Monitor impressed me with its in-depth visibility into my infrastructure."

Cons

"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."

"The process of implementation needs to be easier."

"They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good."

"Azure Monitor's integration with applications could be improved."

"If I contact the First Line Support, they seem disconnected and lack technical information."

"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."

"There are a lot of things that take more time to do, such as charting, alerting, and correlation of data, and things like that. Azure Monitor doesn't tell you why something happened. It just tells you that it happened. It should also have some type of AI. Environments and applications are becoming more and more complex every day with hundreds or thousands of microservices. Therefore, having to do a lot of the stuff manually takes a lot of time, and on top of that, troubleshooting issues takes a lot of time. The traditional method of troubleshooting doesn't really work for or apply to this environment we're in. So, having an AI-based system and the ability to automate deployments of your monitoring and configurations makes it much easier."

"There is room for improvement in stability."

More Azure Monitor cons

"I had difficulty installing Sysdig Monitor on Windows."

""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."

"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."

"The tool is expensive."

"The product offers a pay-as-you-go model to users. The charges are to be paid according to the usage of the product."

"The Azure Insight is a little bit expensive."

"It's a costly solution"

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."

"The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

"Sysdig Monitor is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sysdig Monitor?

Sysdig Monitor is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sysdig Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sysdig Monitor?

During my undergraduate studies, I investigated how the frequency or order of actions within a specific system triggered events on our website. To achieve this, I effectively used Sysdig Monitor to...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 30% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 30% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 25% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 15% of the time

More Sysdig Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

June 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Monitoring

June 2025

Download Sysdig Monitor product report

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Sysdig Monitor allows you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud infrastructure, services, and applications. Built on open source, it provides immediate, deep visibility into rapidly changing container environments. You can resolve issues faster by using granular data derived from actual system calls enriched with cloud and Kubernetes context along with Prometheus metrics. Remove silos by unifying data across teams for hybrid and multi-cloud monitoring.

Sysdig

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

SAP Concur, Goldman Sachs, Worldpay by FIS, Cisco, Experian, Home Office, Societe Generale, Sunrun. More here: https://sysdig.com/customers/

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. Sysdig Monitor

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. Sysdig Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Sysdig Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. Sysdig Monitor report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.