Azure Monitor vs NetApp Cloud Insights comparison

Microsoft and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while NetApp is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.8. Microsoft holds a 6.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to NetApp’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews

5,343 Views
2,687 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Insights

Read 13 NetApp Cloud Insights reviews

550 Views
95 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

NetApp Cloud Insights

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Azure Monitor and NetApp Cloud Insights compete in cloud monitoring and management solutions. Azure Monitor has an advantage in environments heavily invested in Microsoft platforms, whereas NetApp Cloud Insights provides superior cross-vendor visibility and analytics.

Features: Azure Monitor offers comprehensive integration with Microsoft platforms, effective alert systems, and seamless compatibility with tools like Power BI and Datadog. It supports real-time monitoring through its dashboards and is noted for its stability and scalability. NetApp Cloud Insights excels in providing advanced analytics, problem pinpointing, and visibility across multi-vendor environments. It delivers strong security features, real-time alerts, and holistic infrastructure monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Azure Monitor requires enhancements in automation, AI capabilities, and clearer pricing models. Users report challenges with log queries and visualizations, as well as cross-provider cloud support. NetApp Cloud Insights needs improved reporting, better pricing transparency, and enhanced dashboards for actionable insights. There is also a call for better real-time analytics and first-level technical support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Monitor is straightforward to deploy in Microsoft environments but faces feedback on improving its technical support for quicker and more competent responses. NetApp Cloud Insights offers deployment flexibility across public, private, and hybrid environments and receives mixed reviews on customer service, with noted areas for support efficiency improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Monitor uses a pay-as-you-go model, praised for affordability but with concerns over high data ingestion costs. Its ROI is positive for Azure users due to decreased operational burden. NetApp Cloud Insights has a competitive pricing model dependent on capacity and usage, appreciated for managing infrastructure costs and delivering good ROI by optimizing spending over traditional tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. NetApp Cloud Insights Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. NetApp Cloud Insights

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (5th)

NetApp Cloud Insights

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 6.2%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Insights is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed

The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.

Read full review

Scott Lauters

Associate IT Director at Wolters Kluwer

It provides a single pane of glass, giving us visibility into the environment

All our production clusters are in Cloud Insight. It provides a single pane of glass, giving us visibility into the environment, which allows us to understand if any issues are going on across any of our clusters. The main issue we were looking to address was the lack of visibility across all the clusters in one single view. We're using Cloud Insight's Unified Manager. It has improved our ability to support and see the immediate status of the entire environment. If we have a critical incident, we can quickly see these issues and loop in monitoring teams and other teams. For example, if our app team thinks there are issues in the environment, we can quickly see if anything related to storage is part of the problem. It improved our organization by unifying all the various support teams. We all have the same view of what's happening in the environment. The dev team knows what storage is used or not, and we can quickly move on to other activities. Cloud Insights provides a single tool for containers and other cloud-based architectures, but we're not using some of those things, such as Kubernetes. We're primarily leveraging the monitoring and reporting. The solution does a great job of inventorying our resources. It allows us to put the tags on the devices. The process is fast. It also gives you the dependencies. I can dig down into all the related components. Cloud Insight's advanced analytics feature does a good job of highlighting the areas where there might be issues in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a robust, stable product."

"The dashboard allows us to easily track various metrics and quickly understand the overall health of our system."

"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."

"The most valuable feature is the universality of their functionalities in all Azure services, including, software solutions."

"It has good troubleshooting features."

"The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds."

"Log analytics and log queries are the most valuable features of Azure Monitor."

"For me, the best feature is the log analysis with Azure Monitor's Log Analytics. Without being able to analyze the logs of all the activities that affect the performance of a machine, your monitoring effectiveness will be severely limited."

More Azure Monitor pros

"All our production clusters are in Cloud Insight. It provides a single pane of glass, giving us visibility into the environment, which allows us to understand if any issues are going on across any of our clusters."

"Among the most valuable features are the queries and reporting that allow us to look at the utilization of resources, at how well the storage is performing, and to report on which resources are being used by which business units. We can track usage across the entire environment, across applications, business units, cost centers, etc."

"Cloud Secure is definitely the most valuable feature and being able to see file level activity. It gives real-time alerting on possible ransomware attacks and provides file security review. It helps us to see if something abnormal is happening on the system before it's too late."

"The solution is easy to deploy."

"NetApp Cloud Insights helps reduce the time spent on problem resolution by up to 50% for my customers, making their operations significantly more efficient and productive, which is a perfect outcome."

"Its ability to quickly inventory our resources, figure out interdependencies across them, and assemble a topology of your environment is brilliant. There is a price associated with it. Whenever you target a NetApp environment, it is included in the price but whenever you want to add different vendors, like VMware and Cisco, the price greatly spikes. Inventorization helps us a lot to visualize the environment."

"The solution is 98 percent stable."

More NetApp Cloud Insights pros

Cons

"Using Azure Monitor and Azure Arc separately to monitor different environments can be complicated."

"If it is configured incorrectly, you can end up with a huge bill."

"The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners."

"Azure Monitor could improve by adding capabilities for data observability and integrating more tightly with their data platform components."

"Integration with third-party tools from other vendors than Azure is more time-consuming"

"In terms of pricing, Azure Monitor's billing based on data size can sometimes lead to increased costs, especially when developers need to purge data frequently. While there are mechanisms in place to track and manage this, there is room for improvement in terms of optimizing data pausing and related processes. Enhancements in this area could help mitigate potential billing concerns and provide a more seamless experience for users."

"I need connectivity with cost management."

"This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better."

More Azure Monitor cons

"Cloud Insights could offer more detail when we drill down into the Azure environment."

"Most of the time, I initially connect with entry-level support, and then I need to request a higher-tier support level, which can result in delays."

"There is room for improving the creating and managing or modifying of reports. That is still a difficult task to do and requires knowledge beyond the storage itself. I would love to see reporting improved so that we can create reports by dragging and dropping pieces into a report form and publish a report that way."

"Ease of reporting is one thing that they're trying to tackle. If you have a specific set of data you want from Cloud Insights, you can ask NetApp to help you build the reports from the ground up. The dashboards are intuitive, but finding the report you want is sometimes a challenge. If you don't have the report already loaded, pulling it in and letting it build its data can be cumbersome."

"The first level of NetApp's technical support could be improved."

"The visualization needs some improvement because there are occasional delays while the system queries information."

"In a perfect world we would have something built, right out-of-the-box, that can identify what we call "noise," and reduce the amount of data. You're presented with so much data when you first start the data collectors. For example, it brings back a lot of change rates that happen just because of standard computing, like profile changes and that sort of thing. Being able to identify things like that and categorize them and strip it down—and it probably can do that, I just haven't gotten there yet—would be very beneficial."

"When I did need support because I was having problems with the solution, the first or the second line just didn't understand it. They were providing this only on a software as a service basis. So, they were asking all the wrong questions."

More NetApp Cloud Insights cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a costly solution"

"The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."

"Customers of Azure Monitor must pay an amount that depends largely on how many services they need to integrate and the storage space required in terms of logs, etc. If they only have a few small services to monitor, the price won't be too high, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, it can certainly get pricey."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Regarding pricing, Azure Monitor is free with Azure license, so there are no additional costs for using it."

"I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."

"The tool's pricing is very good. I could say that Microsoft offers different cost models, which are listed on the product's website."

"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is complex. The calculation depends on what you're ingesting. A terabyte of one product is not a terabyte of another product. Virtual machines don't equate so easily. It's all about the end-use managed units and having an easy place to reference how far those units go."

"The licensing model could be improved. We love that you can use it for free for looking at NetApp products. You only need licenses to look at non-NetApp products, but as soon as you do that, you start utilizing licenses that actually would have been free in the public. So, there is a bit of an anomaly in the licensing model."

"Be aware of the capacity licensing and understand how that works, because it is based on capacity. Getting an understanding of that is the biggest thing."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is based on the device you purchase and includes support services."

"We are billed based on management units, so we can purchase units based on six months, twelve months, twenty-four months, or thirty-six months upfront or pay as you go depending on our requirements."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

33%

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Insights?

NetApp Cloud Insights helps with login monitoring and troubleshooting. Previously, if we had performance concerns or needed to interface with other groups and their products, a task that should req...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Insights?

The licensing is complex. The calculation depends on what you're ingesting. A terabyte of one product is not a terabyte of another product. Virtual machines don't equate so easily. It's all about t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Insights?

Ease of reporting is one thing that they're trying to tackle. If you have a specific set of data you want from Cloud Insights, you can ask NetApp to help you build the reports from the ground up. T...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Dell CloudIQ vs NetApp Cloud Insights

Compared 48% of the time

Datadog vs NetApp Cloud Insights

Compared 26% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs NetApp Cloud Insights

Compared 26% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Insights Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

June 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Insights

May 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Insights product report

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

NetApp Cloud Insights is an infrastructure monitoring tool that gives you visibility into your complete infrastructure. With Cloud Insights, you can monitor, troubleshoot and optimize all your resources including your public clouds and your private data centers.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. NetApp Cloud Insights

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. NetApp Cloud Insights

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. NetApp Cloud Insights and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. NetApp Cloud Insights report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.