

BMC TrueSight and Azure Monitor compete in the IT monitoring and event management category. BMC TrueSight stands out for its extensive integration capabilities, while Azure Monitor excels in its seamless integration within Azure's native ecosystem.
Features: BMC TrueSight provides robust event management, extensive Knowledge Modules for diverse operational needs, and monitoring capabilities across servers, applications, and networks. Azure Monitor offers strong integration with Azure services, real-time analytics, and customizable alerts. It includes Application Insights for detailed analysis and proactive monitoring of cloud resources.
Room for Improvement: BMC TrueSight is criticized for its complexity and high deployment requirements, with users needing numerous servers for full implementation and improved documentation. Azure Monitor could enhance its alert configuration and visualization capabilities and evolve its AI features to match competitors like Dynatrace. Both could improve; BMC in usability and Azure in AI and simplifying complexities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC TrueSight is predominantly on-premises and complex to deploy requiring significant resources, with mixed customer support reviews. Azure Monitor, as a cloud-based service, benefits from easier integration within Azure environments. However, complexity can arise when navigating multiple components. Azure's integration within the ecosystem facilitates ease of use compared to BMC's mixed customer service experiences.
Pricing and ROI: BMC TrueSight has high pricing, especially at enterprise scale, but offers powerful features that can justify the cost with careful license management. Azure Monitor, with its transparent pay-as-you-go pricing, is generally seen as more cost-effective for Azure-native environments. Both products enhance operational efficiency, yet cost structures and perceived value differ, placing Azure as more economical for Azure-centric users.
Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.
However, the second-line support is good.
Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.
I would rate the support for Azure Monitor as a seven.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
With APM, you can go heavy or you can go light. It just depends on what you want, what your use case is, and how reactive you want to be to system load or resilient to failure.
Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry.
The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.
The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components.
There are some complexities with deployment that could be improved in BMC TrueSight.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
BMC TrueSight licensing costs are on the more expensive side.
The alerting features definitely help in reducing operational downtime for my customers by allowing us to get notifications in advance and take active actions.
I also appreciate the ability to measure feature activity, see what types of devices they are on, follow specific use cases, and measure the amount of traffic going to a particular application.
Resource monitoring is essential.
Automated root cause analysis and predictive capabilities are powerful features that assist in resource utilization and capacity planning.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Monitor | 2.2% |
| BMC TrueSight | 1.4% |
| Other | 96.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Azure Monitor delivers comprehensive monitoring across applications and cloud resources, integrating seamlessly with Azure services to enhance performance tracking and telemetry analysis.
Azure Monitor extends monitoring capabilities for applications, infrastructure, and security, featuring easy integration with Azure and third-party tools. It supports dynamic alerting and telemetry, offering log analytics and metrics gathering. Users benefit from its alert system and intuitive dashboards, making it a preferred choice for multi-cloud and infrastructure monitoring across diverse IT environments. While users seek improved query building and interface navigation, they appreciate its scalability and cost-effectiveness.
What key features does Azure Monitor offer?Azure Monitor sees widespread use for infrastructure and application monitoring across industries. Companies rely on it for performance tracking and incident management, often integrating it with Application Insights for enriched data analysis. Organizations use it to monitor servers and cloud services, utilizing its capabilities in DevOps practices and during cloud transformation processes for analyzing database metrics and ensuring efficient application functioning.
BMC TrueSight offers extensive event management and seamless integration, providing comprehensive monitoring across varied infrastructures through its centralized console and Knowledge Modules.
BMC TrueSight delivers robust event management capabilities with seamless integration and comprehensive monitoring of diverse infrastructures. Its single console simplifies management, offering automated triage for standardized alerts, enhancing efficiency. Knowledge Modules support services from hardware to cloud, while proactive monitoring and capacity optimization enhance customization. It efficiently supports mixed environments by providing detailed insights and intelligently routing alerts to reduce noise. While improvements are needed in deployment, integration, AI, automation, reporting, and complexity reduction, it still meets diverse operational needs effectively.
What are BMC TrueSight's key features?
What benefits and ROI should users seek in BMC TrueSight?
BMC TrueSight is widely used in performance and availability monitoring for infrastructure and applications, supporting the monitoring of servers, databases, networks, and IT environments. It is implemented to improve management and reduce downtime, serving needs in data centers and cloud services. Organizations leverage it for event management, comprehensive data center monitoring, and cloud services, using its capabilities for alerting, ticket creation, troubleshooting, and compliance, enhancing operational efficiency globally.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.