Azure Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Microsoft is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.6, while OpenText is ranked #47. Microsoft holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Azure Backup

Read 60 Azure Backup reviews

6,918 Views
6,641 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

8,800 Views
8,096 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Azure Backup

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and Azure Backup are leading data protection solutions competing in the data protection category. Azure Backup appears to have the upper hand in terms of features and ease of deployment, while OpenText Data Protector is favored for pricing and customer service based on user reviews.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is noted for its advanced automation, comprehensive data recovery capabilities, and efficient backup processes. Azure Backup is recognized for its seamless integration with other Azure services, robust scalability, and versatile storage options.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector needs better support for newer storage technologies, a more intuitive management experience, and enhanced reporting capabilities. Azure Backup requires improved support for non-Windows environments, more granular backup options, and faster customer support response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector receives positive feedback for its straightforward deployment process and consistent customer service. Azure Backup also offers a seamless deployment model but has mixed reviews on customer service consistency.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is noted for competitive pricing and reliable ROI. Azure Backup, though more expensive, is considered worth the price for its extensive features and integration benefits. OpenText Data Protector’s pricing remains compelling for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

47th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Azure Backup is 1.1%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Backup	1.1%
OpenText Data Protector	1.1%
Other	97.8%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

Has supported secure data storage with incremental backups and centralized monitoring

Azure Backup supports all the features that we need, so additional features are not an immediate need for me. The documentation for Azure Backup seems okay for me; it is good overall, but it should be more descriptive for each item. It should elaborate more on how backup and restore are fulfilled in different scenarios. One of the reviews indicates that Azure Backup needs improvements for specific backup options beyond just full VM snapshots. I believe it should be improved actually. Regarding specific backup options, I say there should be improvements compared to how they provided them in older days.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our clients are seeing that it is cost-effective."

"The solution is cost-effective, the backup features are very useful, and the solution overall is very reliable."

"The tool has a lot of features."

"The most valuable feature is the ease in which it backs up our data."

"Azure Backup is very simple to use and user-friendly."

"The storage backup is very efficient."

"Azure Backup is good because it is entirely cloud-based, which means that you can be 99.9% sure that your backup is safe."

"With Azure Backup, you can readily make your environment if your setup somehow fails on the cloud or on-premises."

More Azure Backup pros

"Data Protector's GUI is the most useful feature."

"Backup of SAP/Oracle -- they are more robust than the competition."

"The installation was simple and provided an easy way to install even on Unix servers. It has excellent features like deduplication."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"It is a traditional backup model. If you talk about file server and the official Windows database, it's a stable product."

"A few of the most valuable features for us are backup and restore, the SQL databases, and the exchange and VM's on tape libraries and disks."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"The valuable features are the ability to backup data, write to D2Ds, and utilize D2D compression technology, so we can store a heck of a lot more data on less storage, saving us time and money."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The time required to restore files should be a little faster."

"The user interface is a little bit confusing and it could be better."

"Lacks an AI system that would enable easier upgrading of the hardware."

"For companies frequently accessing data or not using Microsoft Azure, the solution may not be very helpful."

"Azure Backup can be improved by providing an option and a utility so we can restore quickly instead of any manual intervention."

"Azure lacks sufficient solutions for a particular scenario, we may need to resort to using third-party applications. In such cases, these applications can be employed to facilitate backup, replication, and the efficient utilization of internet connectivity and bandwidth. They enable us to effectively manage and transfer data while ensuring optimal utilization of network resources. However, it would be a benefit if we did not have to use third-party applications for these operations."

"While Azure Backup allows ingress data, the egress data is chargeable, which should be excluded."

"Maybe they could improve the fees. The cost is a bit high."

More Azure Backup cons

"I would like to see a better user interface in the next release."

"The major issue we are facing in this product is Sybase database integration."

"Every upgrade is such a headache. For example, we currently have to upgrade to a new version, but somehow the connection to storage isn't happening because there are issues with the library."

"It can occasionally be inaccurate in its backup/recovery time estimates."

"Currently, I can only give negative feedback because my experience in its current state is not up to the mark."

"I think the GUI needs a vast overhaul."

"The HPE Data Protector may not be enough to support your RPO/RTO needs, specifically for application integrated backups."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Customers prefer Azure Backup because it has a pay-as-you-go model, and they won't have to pay an upfront amount at the initial level."

"Azure Backup can be expensive if you are not vigilant about your storage steering."

"Azure Backup is a moderately priced solution."

"Comparing the pricing with other technologies, Azure Backup is more affordable for customers. It follows a pay-as-you-go model, where we pay according to our consumption."

"It is a very cheap cloud solution."

"The product is not expensive."

"We are paying about $100,000 USD per year, just for a couple of servers."

"The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future."

More Azure Backup pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?

Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?

The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Backup?

Azure Backup can be improved by providing an option and a utility so we can restore quickly instead of any manual intervention. Restoration times require manual backup and manual interventions, and...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Rubrik vs Azure Backup

Compared 8% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Backup

Compared 8% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Azure Backup

Compared 7% of the time

N2W vs Azure Backup

Compared 6% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Azure Backup

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Backup Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup

October 2026

Download Azure Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

October 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Azure Backup provides efficient data protection with features like fast recovery and encryption. It integrates seamlessly with Azure services, offering scalable, secure storage solutions. Users benefit from straightforward configurations and flexible retention, although improvements in hybrid integration are needed.

Azure Backup stands out with its comprehensive data protection capabilities, including features such as incremental backups and geo-replication. It ensures consistent security and performance through its scalability and redundancy. Users find the platform cost-effective and appreciate its seamless integration with Azure services. While Azure Backup excels in many areas, such as ease of use and robust monitoring, challenges persist in hybrid environment integration and application-level backups.

What key features does Azure Backup offer?

Ease of use: Features straightforward configuration and incremental backups.
Fast recovery: Supports rapid data restoration with geo-replication.
Advanced protection: Provides encryption and flexible retention options for data security.
Seamless integration: Works well with Azure services for a unified experience.
User-friendly management: Offers robust monitoring and reporting tools.

What advantages should users expect from Azure Backup?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides affordable data protection solutions.
Scalability: Ensures consistent performance with cloud scalability.
Security: Enhances data security with advanced encryption features.
Efficiency: Simplifies backup processes with efficient scheduling.

Azure Backup is widely used in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as financial services, healthcare, and government. It is ideal for organizations looking to back up virtual machines, manage disaster recovery, or support cloud migrations. Its adaptability allows businesses to safeguard SAP workloads and SQL databases efficiently.

Microsoft

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

November 2026

Free Report: Azure Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.