Microsoft Entra ID vs NetIQ Access Manager comparison

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Access Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #21. Microsoft holds a 28.0% mindshare in AM, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 234 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

8,069 Views
6,157 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

NetIQ Access Manager

Read 5 NetIQ Access Manager reviews

396 Views
260 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

NetIQ Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

NetIQ Access Manager and Microsoft Entra ID are both widely used in identity and access management. Microsoft Entra ID seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features, making users feel it is worth the price.

Features: NetIQ Access Manager users value its adaptability with different systems, robust security measures, and competitive pricing. Microsoft Entra ID is noted for its comprehensive cloud integration, advanced authentication mechanisms, and extensive features.

Room For Improvement: NetIQ Access Manager users suggest enhancing its reporting tools, streamlining updates, and improving offline functionality. Microsoft Entra ID users desire better offline functionality, more intuitive setup processes, and enhanced support for hybrid environments.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: NetIQ Access Manager is appreciated for its straightforward installation and reliable customer support. Microsoft Entra ID’s deployment is perceived as more challenging, but its customer service is highly responsive.

Pricing and ROI: NetIQ Access Manager is favored for its lower setup costs, leading to quicker ROI. Microsoft Entra ID, though perceived as more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,900 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

234

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

NetIQ Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Access Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 28.0%, up from 23.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetIQ Access Manager is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Cassio-Silva

Technology director at Asyg

Multi-Factor Authentication, stable, and extremely scalable

I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem The Multi-Factor Authentication of NetIQ Access Manager has helped protect our organization. The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can centralize and manage everything much more effectively with this tool."

"The implementation of device-bound passkeys in Microsoft Authenticator helps with phishing-resistant authentication."

"Microsoft Entra ID is pretty user-friendly and intuitive. The graphics are particularly useful when it comes to the auditing part."

"The single sign-on is very convenient for us."

"The most valuable feature is the conditional access policies. This gives us the ability to restrict who can access which applications or the portal in specific ways."

"The solution has some great features, such as identity governance, and user self-service. The Outlook application is very good and is used by a lot of people even if they are using Google services."

"The most valuable feature is Identity and Access Management. As an IT administrator, this feature allows me to manage access for users and groups."

"A couple of features are valuable, but the one that comes across the most to me is multi-factor authentication."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"It's very easy to integrate with applications."

"There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs."

"The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication."

"The single sign-on feature is excellent."

"The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database."

Cons

"The main issue is that because Active Directory is in the cloud, it will inevitably be dependent on internet connectivity."

"In my opinion, Microsoft sometimes releases products too early without providing enough documentation. Our team works with innovative solutions like verified ID, identity governance ,and lifecycle workflow. When we started with lifecycle workflows, we had only two integrated worklows. Still, we couldn't find much of the information we needed in the documentation about our use case or how to leverage IDs in our proof of concept."

"They can improve how people manage their accounts. They can simplify and provide more information about adding or updating a phone number or email id in the MSA account. A lot of time users do get confused about where to go. For example, if I've changed my mobile number, where do I go and change my mobile number in the MSA account? A lot of time, employees think if they change the phone number in the HR database, it'll automatically get changed on the MSA account, which is not the case. Microsoft can simplify that and add these questions in the FAQ documents as well."

"Definitely, the price could be lower. When we moved from AWS to Azure, we started paying more."

"The cost is one area that needs improvement."

"My understanding is, in the future, they will be able to bring everything into one single platform and they are not there yet."

"The integration between the Azure active directory and the traditional active directory could be improved upon."

"The solution has certain limitations. For example, it has very little governance functionality."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"Having the ability to easily extract and view and compare and version control configurations would be ideal."

"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device."

"I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance."

"Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more devices that utilize biometrics for Multi-Factor Authentication to improve the solution."

"The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure AD comes with Office 365, so we are just paying for the Office 365 license."

"The P1 version costs $6 per user per month."

"It is not too expensive."

"It can be a bit expensive for organizations, but they do have different pricing models. Their free tier can be used on a personal level, but for an organization, the licenses might be a bit expensive. In general, the licenses can become cheaper, which will make it accessible for more people."

"The price is fine. It's a good value for the money compared with other solutions."

"Entra has P1 and P2 licenses that are bundled with lots of applications."

"For you to make use of some of the security features, you need to upgrade your licenses. If it is possible, could they just make some features free? For instance, for the Condition Access policy, you need to set that up and be on Azure AD P2 licensing. So if they could make it free or reduce the licensing for small businesses, that would be cool, as I believe security is for everyone."

"Pricing could always be better. You pay the premium for Microsoft. Sometimes, it is worth it, and at other times, you wish to have more licensing options, especially for smaller companies."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Regarding pricing, for the services we receive, it seems within the market range and about average.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Okta Workforce Identity vs NetIQ Access Manager

Compared 45% of the time

More NetIQ Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

April 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

NetIQ Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder

April 2025

Download NetIQ Access Manager product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

No data available

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.