Axonius vs RSA Archer comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Axonius and RSA are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. Axonius is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while RSA is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.5. Axonius holds a 2.2% mindshare in IVRM, compared to RSA’s 8.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 11 Axonius reviews

6,788 Views
1,086 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

RSA Archer

Read 42 RSA Archer reviews

10,318 Views
3,508 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Axonius

RSA Archer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

RSA Archer and Axonius are competing solutions in IT security and risk management. RSA Archer is preferred for its robust risk management capabilities, while Axonius is favored for comprehensive asset visibility and integration capabilities.

Features:RSA Archer stands out for advanced workflow customization, policy management, and its robust governance features. It offers seamless integration with multiple data systems and a strong focus on governance. Axonius excels in asset management, providing comprehensive visibility and integration capabilities with various security systems. It offers efficient automation and easy integration with multiple security tools, enhancing its asset management features.

Room for Improvement:RSA Archer could benefit from simplifying its setup process and improving ease of customization to make it more accessible to users with varied technical skills. Its pricing model can also use more transparency for smaller enterprises. Axonius could enhance its query-building tools for more flexibility, improve reporting features, and expand support for even more IT security tools to cover emerging platforms and technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:RSA Archer provides flexible deployment with strong customer support but often involves a more complex setup process. Axonius offers a streamlined deployment process with effective integration capabilities and responsive support, providing an edge in ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI:RSA Archer's pricing is higher due to extensive customization options but promises strong ROI for organizations focused on comprehensive risk management. Axonius has a straightforward pricing model, delivering faster ROI through quick deployment and scalability, making it attractive for those prioritizing asset management and security integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. RSA Archer Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. RSA Archer

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,938 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd)

RSA Archer

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (1st), IT Governance (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Axonius is 2.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Archer is 8.1%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
RSA Archer	8.1%
Axonius	2.2%
Other	89.7%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Zhtay Zhtay

senior security engineer at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees

Asset discovery has transformed how we find unprotected devices and deploy endpoint defenses

The best features Axonius offers, in my opinion, are asset discovery, finding rogue devices, and vulnerability management. When I mention device discovery and management, the speed of discovery, the level of detail, and network-level discovery stand out to me. Axonius has positively impacted my organization significantly, as we discover thousands upon thousands of devices that don't have EDR tools, which means they are not protected. With Axonius, we were able to find them and deploy the EDR tool that they needed. I can share that we found about the Linux servers and Windows servers, hundreds of them, that were deployed. They were re-imaged and didn't have an EDR tool, and the integration with other tools proved that these devices are live on our network, and they just don't have a specific tool that we need to deploy to them.

Read full review

Celda Juby

Information Security Specialist at Dubai Health Authority

Centralized management strengthens compliance with good look and feel

From my perspective as a customer and end user, Archer has an impressive look and feel, but the most adaptive feature is its ease of configuration which helps to enhance our process according to our maturity. It's more about our organization getting centralized with an integrated approach that focuses on risk governance and compliance. When can provide a detailed dashboards to management with the details of risks from top-down or bottom-up prioritizing actions based on its criticality or necessity. This allows us to show end users and management where the issues lie and effectively demonstrate accountability and visibility in compliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Axonius has positively impacted my organization significantly, as we discover thousands upon thousands of devices that don't have EDR tools, which means they are not protected."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"In comparing Axonius to other products, I believe its main competitors on the market offer similar functionalities, but my experience with other solutions has shown me that Axonius stands out."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

More Axonius pros

"From my perspective as a customer and end user, RSA is about the look and feel."

"The solution's most valuable features are data feeds, templates, reports, dashboards, and workload management."

"Flexible record permissions and data import features."

"The part I liked about Archer was the risk assessment for deficiencies and being able to use it there."

"You can do wonders with this tool, but you have to be very specific in your utilization."

"Archer has simplified our security audits. It's made it easier to raise and trigger questionnaires to customers."

"The most valuable features are the advanced workflow and the dashboards. This tool can present data wonderfully to management, and it is easy for them to manage the risk plans."

"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."

More RSA Archer pros

Cons

"I think Axonius can be improved with more integration with different third-party tools, so we can identify which tools are missing and what more we can do with these endpoint devices floating around on our network."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"Axonius needs to improve by having the ability to ingest IoT data, as customers are requesting IoT data which we are currently unable to provide."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

More Axonius cons

"Because I have not upgraded, the graphical user interface is not the current one. It is not very modern and as user-friendly as it could be."

"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."

"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."

"A remaining area for improvement is integration. There should be built-in integration mechanisms, for example, for organizations switching from platforms like ServiceNow to Archer, instead of custom integrations for each client."

"There is no inbuilt alert in Archer to let us know that a data feed has failed or did not run for different reasons. So, we don't even get to know that a feed has not run until somebody reports it to us. This has been a problem all the time. Data feeds have always been a big headache for us because there is no feature to let us know if a feed has not run or has failed. If Archer had a feature to send us an email notification when a feed has failed, it would've been very helpful. This is the reason why our users are slowly moving away to another platform. Some of the modules that I have been managing are being moved to ServiceNow. Next year, a lot of our modules will be moved from RSA Archer to ServiceNow, and the data feed issue has been one of the main reasons."

"An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost."

"The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you have to scroll or type elsewhere and copy-paste it. It's very inconvenient."

"RSA Archer somehow lags behind in the user interface. Additionally, the reporting capability of Archer should be improved."

More RSA Archer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"The pricing is okay. The licensing costs are very reasonable; it is very affordable to us."

"I am not sure about other companies, but it's quite expensive."

"As I am a developer and responsible for providing production support, I do not have personal knowledge of the pricing. However, my colleagues claim that it is very expensive in comparison with other tools."

"I am not 100% familiar with that, especially with their new model. I just know that the way they've licensed per user to scale is good."

"The solution is not at all a cheap product."

"RSA Archer's price is justifiable and not as expensive, compared to ServiceNow. I have heard that the licensing for ServiceNow is much more expensive. I'm unaware whether there are any additional costs after licensing fees."

"The license is costly for the solution, but the remaining set up and maintenance is quite cheaper."

"The solution’s pricing is moderate."

More RSA Archer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

For pricing, I would rate it as a 7, where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

I am generally satisfied with Axonius's reporting features. The reporting part could be simplified for the end user, and it might be beneficial to have tutorials or drafts from the vendor. I want t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My use case for Axonius is extensive as I utilize it in multiple processes, and I would describe the use case for Axonius as great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA Archer?

While it provides benefits in terms of security, the pricing is a bit higher than customers typically expect. It would be helpful if RSA Archer had the capability for two-way integration because, i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?

Regarding the compliance, risk, and governance tools, I am comfortable discussing the tools in the GRC category. The specific module from ServiceNow is the ServiceNow Compliance, Risk, and Governan...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Archer?

I have been in touch with about three companies who use RSA Archer actively in the compliance area. These companies use RSA Archer for nearly all purposes, including governance, internal risk, and ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 13% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Axonius

Compared 8% of the time

OctoXLabs vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

Armis Centrix for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

MetricStream vs RSA Archer

Compared 5% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs RSA Archer

Compared 5% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs RSA Archer

Compared 4% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

LogicManager vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

More RSA Archer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

September 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

RSA Archer

September 2026

Download RSA Archer product report

Also Known As

No data available

Archer

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

RSA Archer provides robust risk management, compliance, and vendor management with intuitive features for customizable and streamlined governance tasks.

RSA Archer delivers integrated solutions supporting risk management and compliance tasks. Its adaptive interface and customizable options enhance workflows, making it valuable for organizations requiring automation, advanced workflows, and easy integration capabilities. While offering flexibility and configuration power, users note potential enhancements for integration, reporting, and interface updates.

What are the key features of RSA Archer?

Easy Implementation: Facilitates quick setup and deployment.
Automation: Streamlines routine tasks for efficiency.
Advanced Workflows: Allows configuration of complex processes.
Dashboards: Provides visual insights into organizational data.
Integration Capabilities: Ensures seamless connectivity with external systems.
Reporting Features: Generates detailed reports for informed decision-making.
Customizable Permissions: Enhances control over access and roles.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Streamlined Processes: Reduces time spent on regulatory compliance tasks.
Improved Data Integration: Offers cohesive and actionable insights.
Configuration Flexibility: Adapts to specific business requirements.
Risk Mitigation: Enhances the ability to manage potential risks proactively.
Enhanced Governance: Strengthens adherence to industry standards and policies.

In the finance, public, and IT sectors, RSA Archer is utilized for managing risk and compliance. Organizations leverage its capabilities for third-party risk, policy management, and security assessments, providing tailored solutions for regulatory compliance and operational risk management. Integration with platforms like ServiceNow enhances its utility within enterprise environments.

RSA

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. RSA Archer

September 2026

Free Report: Axonius vs. RSA Archer

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. RSA Archer and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. RSA Archer report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.