No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Armis Centrix for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis Centrix for Asset Man...
Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Secure Remote Access (6th)
Axonius
Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Armis Centrix for Asset Management and Security is 4.0%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axonius is 27.3%, down from 32.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Axonius27.3%
Armis Centrix for Asset Management and Security4.0%
Other68.7%
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Armis Centrix for Asset Management and Security?
Leave a review
ZZ
senior security engineer at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees
Asset discovery has transformed how we find unprotected devices and deploy endpoint defenses
The best features Axonius offers, in my opinion, are asset discovery, finding rogue devices, and vulnerability management. When I mention device discovery and management, the speed of discovery, the level of detail, and network-level discovery stand out to me. Axonius has positively impacted my organization significantly, as we discover thousands upon thousands of devices that don't have EDR tools, which means they are not protected. With Axonius, we were able to find them and deploy the EDR tool that they needed. I can share that we found about the Linux servers and Windows servers, hundreds of them, that were deployed. They were re-imaged and didn't have an EDR tool, and the integration with other tools proved that these devices are live on our network, and they just don't have a specific tool that we need to deploy to them.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.
914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?
For pricing, I would rate it as a 7, where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.
What needs improvement with Axonius?
I am generally satisfied with Axonius's reporting features. The reporting part could be simplified for the end user, and it might be beneficial to have tutorials or drafts from the vendor. I want t...
What is your primary use case for Axonius?
My use case for Axonius is extensive as I utilize it in multiple processes, and I would describe the use case for Axonius as great.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis, Qualys, Axonius and others in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM). Updated: August 2026.
914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.