AWS Well-Architected Tool vs Sparx Pro Cloud Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
704 views|528 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Sparx Systems Logo
449 views|312 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Well-Architected Tool and Sparx Pro Cloud Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's most valuable feature is adaptability."

More AWS Well-Architected Tool Pros →

"We have found the technical support to be helpful.""The solution's most valuable feature is ArchiMate which I use daily."

More Sparx Pro Cloud Server Pros →

Cons
"They could provide a simplified process for building and deploying solutions in the cloud."

More AWS Well-Architected Tool Cons →

"The solution should allow easier access with enhanced customization options for web page DHTML.""The user-friendliness could be even better."

More Sparx Pro Cloud Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The platform’s pricing depends on the specific project requirements."
  • More AWS Well-Architected Tool Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution's Ultimate Plan costs $399 per year."
  • More Sparx Pro Cloud Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's most valuable feature is adaptability.
    Top Answer:The platform’s pricing depends on the specific project requirements. Customers sometimes prefer using AWS Well-Architected Tool as they already partner with the solution provider.
    Top Answer:They could provide a simplified process for building and deploying solutions in the cloud.
    Top Answer:The solution's most valuable feature is ArchiMate which I use daily.
    Top Answer:We're paying 15 dollars per user per month for large teams, which is more expensive than the competition, but it has more features, such as cloud VPN and testing. There is no other cost apart from… more »
    Top Answer:There could be improvement in connecting to and securing this connection. Spark is not up to date on its Insight dashboard compared to competitors, but this impacts the digital experience. It is… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    704
    Comparisons
    528
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    285
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    449
    Comparisons
    312
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    333
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AWS Well Architected Tool
    Learn More
    Overview

    The AWS Well-Architected Tool helps you review the state of your workloads and compares them to the latest AWS architectural best practices. The tool is based on the AWS Well-Architected Framework, developed to help cloud architects build secure, high-performing, resilient, and efficient application infrastructure. This Framework provides a consistent approach for customers and partners to evaluate architectures, has been used in tens of thousands of workload reviews conducted by the AWS solutions architecture team, and provides guidance to help implement designs that scale with application needs over time.

    Share, review and inform

    Pro Cloud Server opens your entire enterprise to your modeling efforts, enabling stakeholders to have secure access for discussion and review. WebEA, hosted on Pro Cloud Server, complements Enterprise Architect by providing a real-time view of project content, anywhere, anytime....

    Sample Customers
    CyberAgent, Inc., nClouds
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Government11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise78%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Architecture Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Well-Architected Tool is ranked 15th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 1 review while Sparx Pro Cloud Server is ranked 14th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews. AWS Well-Architected Tool is rated 8.0, while Sparx Pro Cloud Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Well-Architected Tool writes "Has an efficient adaptability feature and helps us set up a high-performing architecture. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Pro Cloud Server writes "Scalable and reasonably priced with good technical support". AWS Well-Architected Tool is most compared with erwin Data Modeler by Quest, SAP PowerDesigner and BiZZdesign HoriZZon, whereas Sparx Pro Cloud Server is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SAP PowerDesigner and Sparx Prolaborate.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.