We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Huawei Cloud WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
"The most valuable features are the geo-restriction denials and the web ACL."
"The simple configuration and the scalability have been most valuable. We are able to scale across all of our different AWS instances."
"We preferred the product based on its cost. AWS WAF is an out-of-the-box solution and integrates with the AWS services that we use. It's natively integrated with AWS."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"AWS WAF is very easy to use and configure on AWS."
"The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules."
"The most valuable feature of Huawei Cloud WAF is its ease of use."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"I would like to see the addition of more advanced rate-limiting features in the next release. It would be beneficial to extend rate limiting beyond just web servers to the main node level."
"I would like to see it more tightly integrated with other AWS services."
"The serverless product from AWS WAF could be improved. For example, they have only one serverless series, Lambda, but they should extend and improve it. Additionally, the firewall rules are not very easy to configure."
"I would like to be able to view a graphical deployment map in the user interface that will give me an overview of the configuration and help to determine whether I have missed any steps."
"One area that could be improved is the DDoS protection."
"On the UI side, I would like it if they could bring back the geolocation view on the corner."
"It will be helpful if the product recommends rules that we can implement."
"It would be good if the solution's feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Huawei Cloud WAF is ranked 53rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Huawei Cloud WAF is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Cloud WAF writes "Easy to use, but its feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Huawei Cloud WAF is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.