AWS Device Farm vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and UiPath are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in MTT, compared to UiPath’s 14.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

AWS Device Farm

Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews

647 Views
615 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 26 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,844 Views
1,564 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS Device Farm

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Device Farm and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Mobile App Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (3rd), Test Management Tools (6th), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 2.3%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 14.5%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11

Automation Test Lead at Cap Gemini

A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance

The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"The test manager component could be improved."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"Its price is a bit high."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 41% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 32% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 27% of the time

More AWS Device Farm Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 47% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

August 2025

Download AWS Device Farm product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.