AWS Device Farm vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Ranorex are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.0, while Ranorex is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in MTT, compared to Ranorex’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

AWS Device Farm

Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews

833 Views
379 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

1,074 Views
789 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

AWS Device Farm

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Ranorex Studio and AWS Device Farm are competing in the software testing environment. Ranorex Studio appears to have the upper hand in automation features, facilitating speedier testing cycles, while AWS Device Farm excels in extensive testing capabilities across various devices.

Features: Ranorex Studio offers comprehensive automation for desktop, web, and mobile applications, simplifying scripting for users. AWS Device Farm provides extensive cloud-based device testing on multiple platforms and devices, enabling simultaneous testing across a wide device matrix. This differentiation in cloud capabilities is crucial for broader testing requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio's on-premises deployment benefits organizations using local infrastructure, providing robust customer service for implementation. AWS Device Farm uses cloud-based deployment, offering seamless implementation without specific hardware needs, enhancing scalability and flexibility. AWS Device Farm's cloud model facilitates easy updates and maintenance, while Ranorex Studio offers tailored customer service for specific needs.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio's higher initial costs are mitigated by its strong automation features, promoting a consistent ROI through improved productivity. AWS Device Farm, with a pay-as-you-go pricing model, offers a scalable solution adaptable to business size and usage, leading to a high ROI for enterprises requiring broad device coverage.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. Ranorex Studio

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 2.3%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 8.3%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11

Automation Test Lead at Cap Gemini

A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance

The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"The solution is stable."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Device Farm?

I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Device Farm?

It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved. Whenever we upload our Zip files to that particular platform, you know, it takes quite some time, especially if the file i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Device Farm?

We have used the solution for malware testing and APM.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 45% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 27% of the time

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 27% of the time

More AWS Device Farm Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2025

Download AWS Device Farm product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

April 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. Ranorex Studio

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Device Farm vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.