We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Bamboo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"The integrations are good."
"The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration."
"One of the significant benefits of Bamboo is its built-in support for numerous clients and the ability to tailor its capabilities to your specific requirements. This high level of customization enables you to create pipelines that are ideally suited to your needs, making it an invaluable tool for conducting advanced testing."
"The most valuable features are compiling and deployment."
"It can do the CI pipeline well."
"The most valuable features of Bamboo are its performance and UI. Additionally, there are a lot of useful plugins, integration with other solutions, such as Bitbucket and Jira, and a helpful online community."
"The platform helps us with automated and timely backup. It provides data replication as well."
"It's one of the best solutions in this line of work. We have many Atlassian products. We use Bamboo, JIRA, Service Desk, and some other Atlassian plugins. We like that it's easy to integrate into each other. It's a suite of services."
"One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo, is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"Bamboo is a bit complicated to use compared to other solutions, such as GitLab. You have to integrate different actions that are difficult that could be made easier."
"Bamboo can improve by providing more with scripting, such as they have with Jenkins. Bamboo is more UI-driven at this time, Jenkins is going in that direction too."
"The solution needs to support more customization in the training. What's offered is pretty generic. They need better training and should offer more guidance."
"Bamboo could improve by having compatibility with GitLab. It would be better to have this platform for deploying code and storing container registries. Bamboo does not have a container registry. Additionally, there could be more features added."
"It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem to grasp, making it difficult to train new people and help them understand."
"Scalability depends on the use case. If it is really a big customer with a lot of tests, it might not be a scalable option for them."
"It would be great if Bamboo could introduce a more containerized deployment model."
"One area that could be enhanced is the governance process, particularly with regard to building approvals and transitions between stages. In comparison to other solutions, such as Jira, which features a workflow that supports approval processes, this capability is not natively available in Bamboo. To implement this functionality, integration with other solutions, such as GSM may be necessary. Although some add-ons, such as Adaptavist ScriptRunner, are available in the market to circumvent this limitation, they may not offer the exact functionality needed. Therefore, there is certainly room for improvement in this area."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Bamboo is ranked 5th in Build Automation with 20 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Bamboo is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bamboo writes "High availability, helpful support, and plenty of plugins available". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and TeamCity, whereas Bamboo is most compared with GitLab, Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Harness and IBM Rational Build Forge. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. Bamboo report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
