AWS Backup vs Bacula Enterprise comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,735 views|2,095 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Bacula Systems Logo
1,357 views|1,020 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Backup and Bacula Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Backup vs. Bacula Enterprise Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It also saves costs and is quick.""RDS backup is one of the most crucial components of any client's cloud environment, so we generally use that. Additionally, we store EBS snapshots in S3.""The solution has an effective overwrite feature.""The auto-scaling feature and the time efficiency of setting up AWS Backup are the most valuable aspects for us.""It provides an easy data migration process from on-premise to cloud.""AWS Backup's most valuable feature is that you can configure it remotely to create backups.""The most valuable features of AWS Backup are point-in-time recovery and support resources.""The most valuable features we have found are the flexibility in the services offered."

More AWS Backup Pros →

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers.""It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light.""Bacula is pretty stable.""The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization.""It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite.""It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure.""The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

More Bacula Enterprise Pros →

Cons
"AWS Backup could improve because you cannot use Glacier or anything but EFS.""There are some limitations to partial backup in AWS Backup.""If AWS Backup were a hybrid solution that also supported on-premises backups then it would be very helpful, especially if you are doing a migration to the cloud.""To create a plan and for all the configuration, one has to do multiple steps, which could be organized in a much simpler way, making the user experience better.""The notifications on the backup and on the mobile app could be more useful. If they could arrange notes or notifications properly and offer services for managing it in our region, it would be helpful for us.""There could be a centralized dashboard with a reporting feature notifying us of daily backup status.""If AWS could also add some hybrid cloud features to AWS Backup, that would be a significant improvement. For example, currently, AWS Backup only backs up to the S3 and Amazon Cloud, and you can only restore from the Amazon Cloud only. However, some people have hybrid environments. They have some workloads on-premises and some workloads in the cloud.""Its cost could be better than a few of its competitors."

More AWS Backup Cons →

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company.""We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI.""We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist.""Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement.""The initial setup could be a bit easier.""Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy.""A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

More Bacula Enterprise Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We don't use a lot of space, only approximately 900 GB, so the price is reasonable. For standing, it's okay. We normally do a payment to SSML, and they are the ones who pay over there. It is around $100 monthly."
  • "There is a lot of flexibility with the services and pricing. The price is reasonable when compared to other products. This is very good for us."
  • "There are no licensing costs for AWS Backup. You pay only for the amount of backup storage you use and then the data transferred between regions. Overall AWS Backup is priced reasonably."
  • "Our customers pay a monthly AWS fee that includes the AWS Backup service."
  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • "Price-wise, I rate the solution a six out of ten. One only has to pay for the storage cost of AWS solutions, which is the standard cost provided by AWS."
  • "Its price is much cheaper than some vendors but more expensive than others."
  • "The pricing is decent."
  • More AWS Backup Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is an open-source solution."
  • "We have a perpetual license."
  • More Bacula Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's most valuable features are its backup capability and tight integration with other AWS services.
    Top Answer:AWS Backup is free of cost, but we need to pay for the backup storage being used.
    Top Answer:There are some limitations to partial backup in AWS Backup. If we have five volumes attached to EC2 and want to take backup for only three volumes and skip two volumes, it is not feasible in AWS… more »
    Top Answer:It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light.
    Top Answer:It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution as a complete backup solution for virtual machines and databases in Prodap - Data Processing in Amapá. Its very lean and simple architecture, with its deduplications not covering… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 113 in Cloud Backup
    Views
    2,735
    Comparisons
    2,095
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    502
    Rating
    8.0
    18th
    out of 113 in Cloud Backup
    Views
    1,357
    Comparisons
    1,020
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    420
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Backup is a fully managed backup service that makes it easy to centralize and automate the backup of data across AWS services. With AWS Backup, you can create backup policies, define backup schedules, and manage backups across multiple AWS accounts and regions from a single console. It supports a wide range of AWS services, including Amazon EBS volumes, Amazon RDS databases, Amazon DynamoDB tables, Amazon EFS file systems, and more. 

    AWS Backup provides a simple and cost-effective solution for protecting your data and ensuring business continuity. It offers features like cross-region replication, incremental backups, and point-in-time recovery. With AWS Backup, you can easily restore your data to any point in time and recover from accidental deletions or data corruption. 

    It also provides a centralized view of your backup activity, allowing you to monitor and manage backups across your entire AWS infrastructure. AWS Backup is designed to be highly durable and secure, with data encrypted at rest and in transit. It integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for fine-grained access control and supports compliance with various industry standards and regulations. 

    Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

    Sample Customers
    TransferWise
    NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Non Tech Company21%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Retailer6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    University10%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Backup vs. Bacula Enterprise
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Backup vs. Bacula Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Backup is ranked 12th in Cloud Backup with 23 reviews while Bacula Enterprise is ranked 18th in Cloud Backup with 9 reviews. AWS Backup is rated 8.0, while Bacula Enterprise is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS Backup writes "Useful point-in-time recovery, highly scalable, and implementation straightforward". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bacula Enterprise writes "Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression". AWS Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud, Rubrik Go and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, whereas Bacula Enterprise is most compared with Bareos, Veeam Backup & Replication, UrBackup, Veritas NetBackup and Acronis Cyber Protect. See our AWS Backup vs. Bacula Enterprise report.

    See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.