Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Artifact vs Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Artifact
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Compliance Management (28th)
Microsoft Purview Data Life...
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (2nd), Data Governance (29th), Microsoft Security Suite (33rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Quality Tools solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Artifact is designed for Compliance Management and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, down 0.1% compared to last year.
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management, on the other hand, focuses on Data Governance, holds 0.7% mindshare, up 0.3% since last year.
Compliance Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS Artifact0.1%
Wiz29.5%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud17.6%
Other52.8%
Compliance Management
Data Governance Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management0.7%
Microsoft Purview Data Governance21.9%
Varonis Platform10.9%
Other66.5%
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

Use AWS Artifact?
Share your opinion
Al Mcpherson - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides clear visibility into our entire information estate, reduces our time to action, and saves us time
The integration across Azure is straightforward. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management has been a game-changer for our data governance. We now have clear visibility into our entire information estate, allowing us to pinpoint data location and implement effective classification. Even though real-time compliance isn't a current need, Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management offers that capability for future requirements. Purview Data Lifecycle Management has reduced our time to action – since we previously lacked such a tool, it's effectively cut our response time in half. Purview Data Lifecycle Management has saved us one working day per month.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compliance Management solutions are best for your needs.
865,985 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management?
We opted for Purview Data Lifecycle Management due to its significant cost advantage over competitors. At a 95 percent price reduction, it was a clear winner. The service operates on a pay-as-you-g...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management?
One of the requirements is to have data leak policies and data access policies. This is very critical to enforce data governance standards, which relate to data classification, access control, data...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management?
I am a customer and user of the tools. We are a big shop, and both the companies I work for are Microsoft Office 365 customers with over eighty thousand seats. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Mana...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Information Governance, Microsoft Purview Records Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, Wiz, Vanta and others in Compliance Management. Updated: August 2025.
865,985 professionals have used our research since 2012.