No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Avaya Wireless [EOL] vs Ruckus Wireless comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Avaya Wireless [EOL]
Average Rating
3.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ruckus Wireless
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
105
Ranking in other categories
Wireless LAN (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Chief of Engineering at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Reporting issues are slow and painful and it needs a controller
1. Avaya wireless was sold to Extreme three years ago with all LAN gears. 2. The advanced APs are working correctly. The low-end APs aren’t working correctly. After three months of troubleshooting and four patches, we ended up replacing the APs at our own expense. 3. Lesson learned: select a brand with a controller. Avaya claims that their AP with an embedded controller makes the central controller obsolete. With our controller, deployment is more difficult as roaming between AP relies on device thresholds. Android, iOS, Dell PC, Spectralink barcode readers all have different Decibel thresholds ranging from 72 DB to 104db. A controller watches mobile devices as they move and instruct the nonoptimal AP not to talk to the device.
PS
CEO at ajuntament del Prat
Reliable wireless coverage has supported busy operations and has improved daily connectivity
We have areas that are interference-prone. I am not using BeamFlex technology with Ruckus Wireless. We are satisfied, but there are some problems in the current Ruckus Wireless solution that we could not solve two years ago, and we are still waiting for a solution. These are lateral management problems, and we solved them with another type of tools. However, I do not know if the new versions of the product have resolved that issue. We had approximately 150 access points at that time, so we had many points to change. We had another solution five years ago, and we changed all the access points to Ruckus Wireless solution as well as the Ruckus Wireless platform to manage all the access points.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The powerful radio is the most valuable feature."
"The product has good stability and deployment, and is easy to configure."
"The WOS makes management and troubleshooting easier."
"My customers use Ruckus Wireless for computing, data transfer, and internet access."
"​Tremendous throughput and easy installation, configuration, and monitoring."
"The mesh technology is the solution's most valuable aspect. Ruckus originally had the patent for it. They might've lost it because I see now that other people are doing it, however, they were the ones who came out with the smart mesh technology first, which is phenomenal."
"With Ruckus, on the other hand, it is a really robust technology and the coverage it provides is helpful during deployment."
"The speed between client to client is really nice. It is better than any other vendor, but officially, I cannot say that to people."
"Its roaming capabilities and the fact that we can have redundant backup controllers are the most valuable. There is a backup controller that is heart beated to the primary. It is also fairly easy to install."
"I find signal combining and team forming in Ruckus Wireless most valuable."
"In head to head competition, Ruckus far outshines them 10 to one."
 

Cons

"Avaya's APs were OEM with firmware provided by another firm. Reporting issues were slow and painful."
"The product is too expensive and does not provide small enterprises with any advantages."
"Signal frequency can be problematic, especially when compared to other brands such as Aruba, HP, and Cisco."
"Mounting options for outdoor access points, I think they could easily improve on that."
"They lack in some hardware stratification."
"It is sometimes difficult to reach technical support when you need it."
"Analytics could be improved."
"Its pricing and licensing can be improved. Its UI can also be more user-friendly."
"The product is very expensive."
"The tool needs to incorporate training. Also, it needs to improve the range of coverage."
"Wi-Fi 6E and the cloud are areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Its price is reasonable for me."
"The price of Ruckus Wireless is less expensive than other solutions, such as Cisco."
"We have a yearly license for our multiple mode 200 or 300 Ruckus Wireless systems. It's a good price."
"The tool’s pricing is competitive with other alternative solutions’ pricing."
"It is not cheap, but it also doesn't carry the high price tag of some other products on the market."
"The setup that I have at the moment does not require licensing, although I am not sure whether a bigger project will mean that I have to spend more."
"Ruckus Wireless is available at a reasonable price"
"With Ubiquiti, there's no annual cost to keep the software upgraded, whereas with Ruckus, you have to pay an annual fee or three-year fee. That makes it a little more pricey."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business69
Midsize Enterprise22
Large Enterprise27
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?
At my organization, we researched Ruckus Wireless among other solutions but ultimately chose Aruba wireless. What did we like about Ruckus? First, it was very easy to use, and anybody with minimal...
Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?
Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...
 

Also Known As

Wireless LAN 9100, Avaya WLAN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Woodfield Academy, Manning Stainton Estate Agents, Breakthrough Urban Ministries, Black Oak Casino, Glamorgan County Cricket Club, Blue Springs School District, East Brunswick Public Schools, University of San Carlos, Holland Hall School
American University of Sharjah, Baruch College, Centro Escolar Liceo Santo Tomšs, Chevalier College, Chico Unified School District, Colegio de Fomento El Prado, Columbia Public Schools, Delta School District, Dordt College, Douglas County School District, Drew University, Armonea, Central Utah Clinic, Grove Hill Medical Center, Inner South Community Health Service, Midwest Surgical, Satilla Regional Medical Center, Lyndoch Living, Polonus, Roaring Fork School District, Sonora State, Vivid, Sydney, Players Club, Sandals, Scandic Hotels, Sheraton LAX, Sunbird
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ruckus, Cisco and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.