Based on our user's reviews, we compared Okta Workforce Identity and Auth0 across several parameters.
Based on the user reviews and considering the overall sentiment, Okta Workforce Identity is preferred over Auth0. Users highly value Okta's seamless integration with various applications and systems, robust security measures, and user-friendly interface. They also appreciate Okta's exceptional customer service and support. While Auth0 also receives positive feedback for its ROI, seamless integration, and user-friendly interface, Okta's customer service and support and its ability to streamline access management processes give it an edge over Auth0.
"It has a lot of customization and out-of-the-box features."
"It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy."
"The most valuable feature is that it is simple to integrate, irrespective of your codebase."
"It's a very powerful platform. It has the ability to do the usual stuff, according to modern protocols, like OIDC and OAuth 2. But the real benefit of using the platform comes from its flexibility to enhance it with rules and, now, with what they call authentication pipelines. That is the most significant feature, as it allows you to customize everything regarding the authentication and authorization process."
"The valuable features are that it is extremely secure and that it's developer-friendly."
"It has improved our organization by providing login authentication for a mobile app."
"It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users."
"The most important thing for me is compliance. Everything that they have developed in Auth0 is already certified by many regulators such as ISO. So, we do not need to take care of that. We have the shared responsibility model to share assets with other products we are using in the cloud."
"The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."
"The provisioning functionality has been the most valuable. This solution has good performance, fast integration and is very responsive."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The product is easy to use."
"It made things a lot easier, especially with passwords."
"Having a single sign-on to all our applications."
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly."
"This is a costly solution and the price of it should be reduced."
"The product support for multi-tenancy could be improved."
"In the past, there was an issue with the multi-tenant where there wasn't the ability to manage them."
"When they introduced the Organizations feature they did support different login screens per organization. However, they introduced a dependency between this feature and another called the New Universal Login Experience. The New Experience is a more lightweight login screen, but it is much less customizable. For example, today, we are able to fully customize our login screen and even control the background image according to the time of day. We have code to do that. But we are not able to write code anymore in the New Experience."
"The tool's price should be improved."
"There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product."
"The product could use a more flexible administration structure"
"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."
"RESTful Web Service calls and their response seem a bit slow."
"In some setup cases, there are issues with attributes not going in properly."
"There are some issues with the interface that can be improved."
"SSO and MFA for improved end-user experience, and protection against password spray attacks, account password self-service."
"The product is expensive compared to other tools."
"Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
Auth0 is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 14 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews. Auth0 is rated 8.2, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Has good documentation but improvement is needed in MFA and application configurations ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Auth0 is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Cloudflare Access and SAP Customer Data Cloud, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Symantec Siteminder. See our Auth0 vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.