Ataccama ONE Platform vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection comparison

Ataccama and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ataccama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Ataccama holds a 2.5% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 10 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

2,497 Views
1,398 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Read 14 Microsoft Purview Information Protection reviews

1,954 Views
1,329 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2025

Ataccama ONE Platform and Microsoft Purview Information Protection are competitors in data management, with Ataccama ONE excelling in data governance and Microsoft Purview leading in data protection.

Features: Ataccama ONE Platform provides robust data profiling, quality management, and MDM solutions. Microsoft Purview Information Protection focuses on enhancing data security with comprehensive compliance and classification features. It offers automatic protection, access control, and native compliance integration with Microsoft environments.

Room for Improvement: Ataccama ONE could enhance integration capabilities with non-mainframe systems and provide more flexible licensing options. Improved AI integration and user-friendly interfaces could also be beneficial. Microsoft Purview could improve PDF labeling on Macs and reduce false positives in data classification. Expanding support for on-premises systems and enhancing complex scenario classification could also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ataccama ONE offers a user-friendly deployment process and strong support services, focusing on guidance and training. Microsoft Purview integrates smoothly within Microsoft ecosystems and offers excellent support environment-wise.

Pricing and ROI: Ataccama ONE generally requires a higher initial investment but provides substantial ROI through detailed data governance and quality management. Microsoft Purview, requiring a premium for its security and compliance features, justifies the cost by offering extensive data protection, providing a strong ROI in security and compliance.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (4th), Data Scrubbing Software (2nd), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th)

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Ranking in Data Governance

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Privacy Management Software (2nd), Microsoft Security Suite (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is 2.7%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

Abhi T

Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Achieve comprehensive data protection with reliable performance and room for enhanced discovery accuracy

The product is still in a growing phase. I could see that many use cases in their product are not capable enough in terms of detecting or protecting. Compared to other products, they are in the middle of bringing their solution up to the mark, so it is not a full-grown solution. They have to get more accurate results in terms of data discovery and classification. The second thing is their support; support from Microsoft takes a lot of time to get a response from their support team. The third thing is their OCR capability is not that great in terms of identifying the documents. We would love to see response times of less than 24 hours. Additionally, there is no way to check the policy's current status in terms of whether it got synced or not. You have to wait and test the use cases after 24 hours or after 48 hours, and once it starts working, then it appears the policy got implemented.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"It is also easy to deploy."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"Purview is about auditing and discoverability. We need to ensure people aren't releasing information that they shouldn't and that they're doing multi-factor authentication or accessing it from the correct devices. It aids in reducing silos within organizations, enabling staff to easily find documents and contacts without exhausting human resources."

"The UI is user-friendly, and I have observed that it improves further each year."

"The user interface is nice and it's very user-friendly on that front."

"The scalability of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is excellent."

"Microsoft Purview Information Protection supports data classification, sensitivity labels, and data loss prevention."

"The features my clients request most are sensitivity labels and data loss prevention. Additionally, I am trying to interest them in risk management and insider risk management, although those features are considered more advanced."

"I created training materials for end users on applying different labels, explaining their purposes, and providing examples. This was crucial since end users would apply the labels in different protection scenarios. The implementation helped the organization in several ways."

"I think Purview is incredibly stable."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection pros

Cons

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."

"Data movement is a pain."

"I would like the time it takes to update a DLP policy on an endpoint to be reduced."

"Our primary concern is third-party application visibility. Many people choose other DLP tools, as they can search the Office 365 suite and detect sensitive information across thousands of other apps. The product is weak compared to the competitors on the DLP front, but the classification is good; the tool needs a bit more maturation."

"I rate Microsoft support six out of 10. Response times are a challenge. It's hard to be an ambassador for a product when you know it will be hard to get support."

"Microsoft Purview Information Protection can improve in terms of scan concurrency and scan processing time."

"I am concerned about its accuracy levels. Sometimes it throws a lot of false positives."

"Scalability is affected by the time it takes to update policies."

"Most of the capabilities they mention are not working as expected. That is where the challenge lies."

"Microsoft customer service is hit or miss. Sometimes, I get a fast and knowledgeable response, while other times, I've experienced delays and received no resolution."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced."

"There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"Initially, Purview's cost seemed quite high because it was for personal use. I was scanning a tiny tenant and thinking, "If I extrapolate this to an enterprise-scale tenant, it will be quite costly." However, I talked to people who had compared it to other products on the market, and they're spending five figures to get started. At least, Purview has a free trial, so you can try some of the features early on."

"The tool's pricing is fairly low, less than 100,000 for a year."

"The tool's pricing is not a problem for customers because they often purchase it as part of a bundle. With an E5 license, for example, users get access to the entire functionality. This is one of the main reasons why many customers are choosing Microsoft."

"The product is affordable, and our clients agree. Sensitivity labels come with the MIP license at an additional $2 a month per user, an excellent deal for auto-labeling capabilities."

"The price is determined by the enterprise licensing, either the E3 or E5 licensing or the EMS plus security and other feature licensing."

"The pricing and setup costs are transferred to my clients, who find it affordable and are satisfied with what they receive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

It ensures that sensitive data is automatically safeguarded, even for email attachments, regardless of the user or device.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

Pricing is good because if somebody is looking for an overall cybersecurity solution, Microsoft has one license with many solutions bundled with that license. The E5 license covers most of the solu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 17% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Securiti vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

August 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Information Protection

August 2025

Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Download Microsoft Purview Information Protection product report

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer

Microsoft Information Protection

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.

Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?

Data Profiling and Cleansing: Enhances data quality with easy configuration.
Flexible Integration: Seamless integration with platforms like Collibra.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Provides ease in workflow management.
Support for AI and Machine Learning: Offers advanced analytical capabilities.
Data Security: Ensures protection with profiling and masking features.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Data Quality: Enhances data accuracy and reliability.
Enhanced Governance: Facilitates better metadata classification and compliance.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data integration and transformation processes.
Advanced Analytics: Leverages AI for insightful data analysis.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.

Ataccama

Implement Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) to help you discover, classify, and protect sensitive information wherever it lives or travels.

MIP capabilities are included with Microsoft 365 Compliance and give you the tools to know your data, protect your data, and prevent data loss.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

July 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.