No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aspect Unified IP vs DIGITAL CX comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aspect Unified IP
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Contact Center Platforms (15th), IVR Systems (5th), Contact Center Infrastructure (11th)
DIGITAL CX
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Customer Communications Management (CCM) (5th), Customer Experience Management (12th), Social CRM (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Aspect Unified IP and DIGITAL CX aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Aspect Unified IP is designed for Contact Center Platforms and holds a mindshare of 2.0%, up 1.4% compared to last year.
DIGITAL CX, on the other hand, focuses on Customer Experience Management, holds 1.9% mindshare, up 0.9% since last year.
Contact Center Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Aspect Unified IP2.0%
Genesys Cloud CX10.7%
Amazon Connect9.0%
Other78.3%
Contact Center Platforms
Customer Experience Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
DIGITAL CX1.9%
Qualtrics XM Platform3.5%
Genesys Cloud CX2.9%
Other91.7%
Customer Experience Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aspect Unified IP?
Leave a review
JV
IT Specialist
Unified communication has reduced global calling costs and supports organized departmental workflows
The best features that DIGITAL CX offers are making international calls, the chat functionality, and the fax capability. We still use fax as some institutions require fax documentation to be sent to us. Adding users is very easy, and the setup is straightforward. The support from RingCentral is exceptional. The international calling capabilities and low costs are outstanding. DIGITAL CX has positively impacted my organization through cost reduction. Currently, we do not assign direct lines to most users. We have very few direct lines, and the cost is much lower by simply creating extensions and only authorizing certain users to make international calls. Last year we started making the adjustment, and we reduced costs from 4,000 dollars to 2,000 dollars in just a couple of months.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contact Center Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
27%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DIGITAL CX?
My experience with the pricing, implementation cost, and licenses of DIGITAL CX has been very good. As I mentioned, the cost was reduced significantly. We have carried out a substantial cost reduct...
What needs improvement with DIGITAL CX?
I believe DIGITAL CX could be improved by making certain menus easier to find. The manuals do not contain sufficient information and do not specify certain cases. In those situations, I sometimes h...
What is your primary use case for DIGITAL CX?
DIGITAL CX serves as the main communication platform in my organization for both internal and external purposes. I use DIGITAL CX for internal communication to facilitate intercommunication between...
 

Also Known As

Unified IP
Dimelo, a Ring Central Company
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Newport City Homes, HomeShop18, Red Roof, CCS Companies, AmBank Group, Golfbreaks.com
Orange, SCNF, AXA, Total, Cdiscount, DB, PMU, Ooredoo, Telenor, BNP...
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Genesys, Five9 and others in Contact Center Platforms. Updated: September 2026.
914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.