ASP.NET vs SharePoint Designer [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

ASP.NET and SharePoint Designer [EOL] are both solutions in the .NET Development Services category. Additionally, 97% of ASP.NET users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of SharePoint Designer [EOL] users who would recommend it.

ASP.NET

Read 35 ASP.NET reviews

2,339 Views
2,292 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

SharePoint Designer [EOL]

Read 49 SharePoint Designer [EOL] reviews

82% willing to recommend

ASP.NET

SharePoint Designer [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and SharePoint Designer [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Harman, Zend and others in .NET Development Services.

To learn more, read our detailed .NET Development Services Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ASP.NET

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

.NET Development Services (2nd)

SharePoint Designer [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

SasidharParupudi

Principle Consultant at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Building reliable web APIs and sites has become faster and development stays well supported

I think Microsoft can make ASP.NET better by catching up with other frameworks by adopting features that are very popular in those frameworks, such as minimal APIs and other innovations. They have introduced Blazor, which is their newer front-end development software framework, but unfortunately, Blazor is not well adopted in the market. However, I feel that they will catch up in the future as Blazor has a lot of potential. In my opinion, there is not anything extra needed immediately for ASP.NET; the framework is self-sufficient and very mature at this stage. The problem lies with wider adoption, as some people are anti-Microsoft and prefer open-source alternatives such as React. Microsoft could potentially do a better job at marketing these solutions, but other than that, the tool has the potential to be used in any enterprise-level applications. I would say the setup process for ASP.NET is relatively simple, but with the latest generation of user management or integration with OpenID, the documentation is not comprehensive in terms of what you can do with the latest libraries. They support many things and have decoupled themselves from their own identity servers, but still need to improve documentation considerably.

Read full review

Raphael Haroun Ikyagh

Network Administrator at Letshego

Offers ability to directly share documents and highly stable

It's been stable for me. I haven't encountered any issues with the sites I've developed locally within the organization as long as the license remains valid. It's very stable. I haven't had any issues with outages or needing to republish content. It's always accessible to authorized users, so it's stable. The stability is almost a ten out of ten for me.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft support is much better than other cloud providers or other industry-standard software vendors at times."

"The most valuable features are ease of use, scalability, and flexibility."

"We choose Microsoft technologies most often because of their simplicity, as any developer can read, understand, support, and maintain the applications easily."

"I started my career with ASP.NET and I like most of the things about it."

"Easy to use and develop pages."

"ASP.NET does have good support for Web APIs for creating RESTful services."

"I have found the entity framework to be a valuable feature. The authentication layer is amazing as well. ASP.NET has a vibrant community, and as a result, we haven't had the need to contact technical support."

"Rapid Development Easy to learn Wide range third party controls availability"

More ASP.NET pros

"This product basically has all of the features that I need, but there is no such thing as a perfect solution."

"We like the highly customizable websites that you can build."

"SharePoint Designer has made information available centrally 24/7."

"SharePoint is great for content management of data."

"It stopped us from having to run around, manually exchanging documents."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's free. If you have SharePoint and you want to do some branding, then the only tool available is SharePoint Designer. Microsoft gives the portal, the content management system, and, on top of that, it gives you Designer. So we don't have a choice, but Designer is good."

"What I found most valuable in SharePoint Designer is that through it, you can perform a lot of SharePoint functionalities, such as creating SharePoint lists and libraries, as well as customizing pages."

"The workflow is the solution's most valuable feature."

More SharePoint Designer [EOL] pros

Cons

"It could use better reporting and documentation."

"An area for improvement is the structure template."

"I'd like to be able to run any application from a specific point instead of compiling all the code. For example, if I want to test function A, I should be able to test it even if my other functions aren't working. Like in SQL, you provide parameters to the function, and it executes. I'd like to see something similar in ASP.NET."

"Sometimes we have issues with instability and it crashes, which is something that should be made to work better."

"You are required to have knowledge of C#."

"The pages are relatively large and hence may be slow."

"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."

"There are often stability issues when new updates are first released."

More ASP.NET cons

"Overall, it's not the best solution in terms of stability."

"The web services aspect of the solution is very weak."

"Microsoft could include more applications in this. And if more applications are included, then it can be scalable that way."

"The downside is the different versions of SharePoint which means we need to have different designers as not all versions are compatible."

"SharePoint does not have enough resources to cover the security part."

"I have heard of clients that have complained about the stability once a certain amount of data, over 200 gigs has been reached as well as the stability of SQL Databases."

"SharePoint Designer doesn't support the features that are available in the latest version of SharePoint Online."

"The record management and digital signature sides need improvement because we still need to rely on other third-party tools."

More SharePoint Designer [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ASP.NET is open-source and free of charge."

"The solution requires a licensing fee but is worth the investment."

"The pricing is a bit high and I believe that it can be brought down."

"This is a free solution. However, we have some server licensing costs which are not directly a cost of using the solution."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. Not too expensive, but not the cheapest either."

"ASP.NET is an open-source solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, with one being cost efficient and 10 being the most expensive, I would rate ASP.NET's pricing at six. There used to be IAF, which you could spin on a Windows machine. However, that sort of setup does not exist for Linux machines. Because customers still prefer a Windows underlying infrastructure, it can get expensive."

"The price of ASP.NET is reasonable. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

More ASP.NET pricing and cost advice

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

"We are using an enterprise SharePoint Designer license."

"The tool is free of cost."

"This solution is free of charge."

"There is no licensing cost for Designer—it's free."

"The entire package is expensive. There is no extra cost in addition to the standard license."

"Most of the time, our customer's license from Microsoft includes the cost of SharePoint. However, if you have to buy it then SharePoint is quite expensive."

"SharePoint Designer is a free product. It's SharePoint that needs a license, not SharePoint Designer."

More SharePoint Designer [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which .NET Development Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ASP.NET?

Our solution is deployed in a hybrid setup; we have some on-site on a private cloud and some on Azure. Most of our costing comes from database licensing, as we use SQL Server, which has very costly...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ASP.NET?

With the Aspire project, the community is working well on third-party tools for integration, but as a framework, it is solid for almost all normal use cases. For some advanced use cases, I do not s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ASP.NET?

I am mainly developing backend solutions, microservices, and monolithic web backends with ASP.NET.I tried Angular and Blazor; I worked with Angular a long time ago, but I worked with a small projec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Visual Studio vs ASP.NET

Compared 30% of the time

JBuilder vs ASP.NET

Compared 19% of the time

Zend Studio vs ASP.NET

Compared 18% of the time

Apache Flex vs ASP.NET

Compared 13% of the time

Genero vs ASP.NET

Compared 12% of the time

More ASP.NET Competitors

Microsoft Visual Studio vs SharePoint Designer [EOL]

Compared 53% of the time

Zend Studio vs SharePoint Designer [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

More SharePoint Designer [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ASP.NET

September 2026

Download ASP.NET product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint Designer [EOL]

August 2026

Download SharePoint Designer [EOL] product report

Overview

ASP.NET is a versatile framework providing cross-platform support, high performance, and robust security. Its architecture supports developers' flexibility and scalability needs, ensuring efficient resource management and seamless Visual Studio and Azure integration.

With its modular framework and dependency injection, ASP.NET enhances development efficiency. Developers appreciate its ease of use, extensive third-party controls, and prebuilt tools, making it a preferred choice for web services, APIs, and backend projects. Despite needing improvements in productivity focus, AI integration, and documentation, its vibrant community and frequent updates keep ASP.NET relevant. Improved mobile support and leveraging open-source capabilities could enhance its adoption further.

What features make ASP.NET stand out?

Cross-Platform Support: Ensures applications run smoothly on different environments.
High Performance: Designed for speed and efficient use of resources.
Asynchronous Programming: Handles more tasks concurrently, boosting performance.
Unified MVC and Web API: Simplifies development with a cohesive approach.
Robust Security: Offers strong protection against vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simplifies development, reducing learning curves.
Scalability: Allows applications to grow with business demands.
Flexibility: Adapts to different industries and project requirements.
Community Support: Extensive documentation and community resources facilitate problem-solving.

ASP.NET finds major use in sectors such as finance, logistics, automotive, and aerospace. It's integral for businesses handling inventory management, financial services, and e-commerce. Teams use ASP.NET alongside ASP.NET Core for microservices and server-side development, often integrating with frontend frameworks like React and Angular for comprehensive web applications and APIs.

Microsoft

SharePoint Designer is the tool of choice for the rapid development of SharePoint applications. Using SharePoint Designer, advanced users and developers alike can rapidly create SharePoint solutions in response to business needs. Advanced users can compose no-code solutions that encompass a variety of common scenarios, from collaborative sites and web publishing to Line-Of-Business data integration, business intelligence solutions, and human workflows, leveraging the building blocks available in SharePoint in an easy to use environment.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Vengo Labs, Oneview Healthcare, BookedOut, Ministry of Rural Development, Grupo WRR

Pyrotek Inc., ICA, Deliver Australia, Secretary of Economy of Mexico, Aegon, ABB Switzerland, Ascent Yarns Private Limited, Bakewell Biscuits Pvt Ltd, Hitachi Consulting

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Harman, Zend and others in .NET Development Services. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.