We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Zend Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, FourJs and others in .NET Development Services."It is seamless compared to Java or any other technology stack."
"ASP.NET works well with Windows applications and more generally, the Windows platform."
"One of the most valuable features in ASP.NET is thread management with asynchronous processing. I've been implementing this for a few years and it has proven to be extremely helpful, especially when using a tool that wouldn't have worked without it. It's definitely a fundamental aspect of the platform."
"The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place."
"The most valuable features are ease of use, scalability, and flexibility."
"I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."
"The developer support for ASP.NET is a big positive. It's actually very good, and since there are so many people who use ASP.NET, it's easy to get responses to questions about ASP.NET in the broader community."
"The solution is easy to learn, understand and develop."
"It has higher quality code, faster debugging, and higher quality projects."
"It has the ability to jump to any file in your project with a few keystrokes, as well as the ability to command-click on any token in your code and have it jump to the token's definition."
"In addition to the visual aspect, there is a need for ASP.NET to provide a robust visual front end like there was in the past."
"Sometimes we have issues with instability and it crashes, which is something that should be made to work better."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."
"The con is that every year they are launching a new technology, and for a company like us, we get confused which version should be used."
"The technology to integrate with cloud information could be improved."
"The solution needs to support its framework on all devices used for mobile application development."
"You are required to have knowledge of C#."
"Stability is sometimes lacking in updates."
"Most recent set of patches (2018) on Mac OS X caused the app to crash when you would cut more than 10 lines of code. Apparently, this was due to a bug in Eclipse, but regardless, it took several months for Zend to post a patch."
"The debugger often has problems determining where to map files to local projects."
Earn 20 points
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while Zend Studio is ranked 8th in .NET Development Services. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while Zend Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zend Studio writes "It has higher quality code, faster debugging, and higher quality projects". ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Zend Studio is most compared with .
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.