Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti Wireless comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN offers up to 50% cost savings, integrates well, and satisfies users with security and ROI benefits.
Sentiment score
7.1
Users achieved significant ROI with Ruckus Wireless WAN over several years, noting cost savings and extended replacement cycles.
Sentiment score
6.7
Ubiquiti Wireless is valued for affordability and longevity, despite minor upgrade and support challenges requiring specific user knowledge.
It delivers everything we need for our wireless network, including security, authentication, and integration with other platforms.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN support is competent but varies in responsiveness, with room for improvement in speed and scalability.
Sentiment score
6.6
Ruckus Wireless WAN support is responsive and efficient, though initial contact expertise and escalation process need improvement.
Sentiment score
5.2
Ubiquiti Wireless customer service is responsive yet inconsistent, with varied satisfaction and reliance on online resources.
I would rate the direct support an eight out of ten.
When we seek support, the service we expect is not promptly delivered, which can be time-consuming.
I didn't have any issues with Ubiquiti support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is scalable for businesses, supporting seamless expansion and integration for diverse environments with ease.
Sentiment score
7.8
Ruckus Wireless WAN offers scalable, flexible solutions for diverse deployment sizes, with manageable costs and extensive industry applications.
Sentiment score
7.6
Ubiquiti Wireless is scalable and versatile, ideal for small to medium deployments, but faces challenges in larger environments.
I find the scalability quite good, with a rating of eight out of ten.
Ubiquiti Wireless offers large scalability, which is very important for our company as we have multiple sites that need to be interconnected and managed effectively.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is praised for its strong stability, dependable performance, and minimal downtime, ensuring long-lasting reliability.
Sentiment score
8.3
Ruckus Wireless WAN is praised for stability and reliability, despite occasional hardware issues needing cautious complex environment deployment.
Sentiment score
7.4
Ubiquiti Wireless is reliable and stable, though some users face issues in crowded areas or after updates.
Ubiquiti Wireless is rated ten out of ten for stability.
 

Room For Improvement

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN needs interface improvements, cost reductions, enhanced security, scalability, better documentation, and seamless integration features.
Ruckus Wireless WAN requires pricing, documentation, support improvements, expanded features, better usability, and adaptation to market demands.
Ubiquiti Wireless needs better support, security, integration, advanced features, and improved setup, scalability, coverage, and product availability.
The licensing scheme and price could be improved.
There seems to be no visible improvement in the Gartner positioning, which is crucial even as companies like Huawei are also entering the wireless sector.
The firewall configuration also requires significant effort and could be improved for ease of use.
Enterprise users require more details and options.
When I want to deploy a Ubiquiti access point with the centralized appliance, we can't do all the configuration in our lab and send it to the shop.
 

Setup Cost

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN pricing is competitive, generally cheaper than Cisco, with flexible payment options and subscriptions available.
Ruckus Wireless WAN pricing varies, seen as valuable yet expensive compared to alternatives, with cost differences by region and packages.
Ubiquiti Wireless offers cost-effective, reliable wireless solutions appealing to small businesses, with no licensing fees and competitive pricing.
The price is a little bit expensive.
The price is always on the higher side, which impacts the perception of return on investment.
Ubiquiti Wireless is cheaper.
The equipment is priced relatively high, though the value it provides makes it worth the cost.
 

Valuable Features

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN offers reliable, scalable connectivity with advanced security, user-friendly management, and seamless integration for enterprises.
Ruckus Wireless WAN offers high performance, easy management, excellent coverage, and unique features, competing effectively with Cisco and Aruba.
Ubiquiti Wireless delivers easy setup, strong performance, affordability, and reliability, making it ideal for small businesses.
We are very satisfied with the solution as it delivers everything we need for our wireless network, including security, authentication, and integration with other platforms.
The most valuable features are the advanced technologies like BeamFlex, which make a significant difference.
All the access points provide good connectivity and are reliable.
Since implementing Ubiquiti Wireless, I have seen improvements in connection security, wireless speed, and overall network stability.
Compared to Ruckus, we have not yet seen all benefits for all users and for administration.
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is 4.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN is 35.7%, down from 37.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ubiquiti Wireless is 39.7%, up from 39.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Joseph Colly - PeerSpot reviewer
Reasonably priced and offers a good GUI
The product is very scalable. When it comes to some schools, they start with the solution's proof of concept in certain sections. My company aims to improve the throughputs in the schools where the product is installed. If the rest of the School wants the product, it is easy to set up the solution. My company uses Aruba Networks Wireless WAN for schools and warehouses but not in the retail sector. The product offers reliability and uptime twenty-four hours and seven days a week. My company gets notified if the reliability offered by the product goes down. My company also gets notified if we are getting hacked.
Udit Narayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement
In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz. Another point is that its penetration power is low when we are using it in any location with more walls, as the signal strength diminishes. So, the signal strength and the penetration power of the signal should be improved. It is not like Cisco. We are using Cisco APs also, but Cisco APs perform better when we compare them with Ruckus. In future releases, I would like to see automatic switching between 2.4 GHz and 5.2 GHz frequencies. We should not have to set it manually. It should automatically change its frequency based on the load. For example, if the number of users increases, then its frequency should change automatically, switching to the less congested band.
Alejandro Del Rosal - PeerSpot reviewer
Software controller is very nice and provides excellent performance
Ubiquiti products are really good. I am a B2B wholesaler, and my type of business requires profit to sell to my installers or for my installers to sell to the end customers. Right now, Ubiquiti doesn't offer that. They are selling the product on their website. We face difficulties with Ubiquiti's supply chain because their products are usually out of stock. I would recommend Ubiquiti Wireless as a brand. However, we are no longer recommending it in my business. I am a wholesaler who recommends installing wireless or network solutions for other companies. I no longer recommend Ubiquiti Wireless because it is not profitable. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
858,945 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Aruba Network Wireless WAN?
I recommend Aruba Networks Wireless WAN. I have been using Aruba for approximately a decade. It has a great centraliz...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Networks Wireless WAN?
The price is a little bit expensive. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, I would place them at...
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise fe...
What do you like most about Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Wireless WAN?
The price is always on the higher side, which impacts the perception of return on investment.
Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better...
Which is better - Ubiquiti Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless offers a wide range of WLAN products. We tested their devices before ultimately choosing Cisco Mera...
What do you like most about Ubiquiti Wireless?
We had a client with a power plant. Different wireless devices from various brands caused problems. We fixed it using...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The Pittsburgh Golf Club, Rio Rancho Public Schools, Amwaj Rotana - Jumeirah Beach Residence - Dubai, Trevecca Nazarene University
American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School
NASCAR Grand-AM, Maritime Parc, Outdoor Music Festival, British Armed Forces, Arcadia School District, Moscow - Enforta
Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: June 2025.
858,945 professionals have used our research since 2012.