We performed a comparison between Arcserve UDP and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I would recommend it if there is a general case."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Our customers are happy with the product’s functionality."
"The data protection functionality is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"We are satisfied with Arcserve UDP. The most important feature that we use and why we choose this product is the RHA feature."
"The most valuable feature is the duplication."
"The product's deployment process was straightforward."
"The backup is the most valuable feature. It also makes storage very easy."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"I had an issue with Arcserve UDP during the failover and the secondary machine didn't get back online, even though it ran automatically. I faced the issue during a crisis situation. However, I haven't faced such a problem again."
"They could work on their marketing approach. I don't see many people leveraging it."
"We have to use a Microsoft hypervisor for installation which is expensive."
"We cannot restore each user's mailbox. Each user's mailbox should be independently restorable. Also, this solution is very slow. If you select all of the servers, it runs for a long time... It needs to be faster. Finally, If anything happens to one server we should be able to switch to another server."
"Licensing can be quite difficult."
"The solution's reporting could be improved and should provide customized reports."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. It can be difficult to assign destinations and choose which files and folders we need to back up. There are some aspects that are unclear."
"The problem is just reliability. If the promises in the marketing material were realized in real life, it would be the perfect solution, but it's just the reliability issues."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
Arcserve UDP is ranked 18th in Backup and Recovery with 41 reviews while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Arcserve UDP is rated 7.6, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Arcserve UDP writes "Global deduplication, stable, and flexible licensing options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". Arcserve UDP is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Acronis Cyber Protect, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Veritas Backup Exec and Rubrik, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Arcserve UDP vs. Iron Mountain Connect report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
