Arbor DDoS vs SiteLock comparison

NETSCOUT and SiteLock are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. NETSCOUT is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.1, while SiteLock is ranked #27. NETSCOUT holds a 13.7% mindshare in DDOS, compared to SiteLock’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SiteLock users who would recommend it.

Arbor DDoS

Read 55 Arbor DDoS reviews

5,864 Views
3,480 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews

315 Views
128 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Arbor DDoS

SiteLock

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

SiteLock and Arbor DDoS compete in the security and threat mitigation category. SiteLock is more affordable and accessible, while Arbor DDoS offers robust features justifying its higher investment.

Features: SiteLock provides website security solutions with malware detection, automated vulnerability scanning, and a web application firewall. Arbor DDoS focuses on advanced threat protection, featuring high-volume traffic management, intelligent anomaly detection, and comprehensive DDoS mitigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SiteLock has a straightforward deployment process and efficient customer support with dedicated assistants. Arbor DDoS requires more resources for deployment due to its complex infrastructure, but its detailed documentation and specialized support staff help with integration.

Pricing and ROI: SiteLock offers budget-friendly plans ensuring quick ROI, appealing to small and medium-sized businesses. Arbor DDoS incurs higher initial costs but provides significant ROI through advanced capabilities, attracting organizations that prioritize detailed security and threat management.

To learn more, read our detailed Arbor DDoS vs. SiteLock Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS vs. SiteLock

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arbor DDoS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SiteLock

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

27th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (63rd), CDN (20th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (41st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Arbor DDoS is 13.7%, up from 13.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SiteLock is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

Hamada Elewa

System Engineer - Security Presales at Raya Integration

Users have experienced comprehensive protection against DDoS threats while enjoying seamless integration

The most valuable feature of Arbor DDoS is that it is based in most of the ISPs all over the world, and Egyptian ISPs are one of them. If a customer who is getting internet connectivity from one of the ISPs has an Arbor at the end, it will be integrated with the ISP Arbor. It's some sort of closing all the cycle with Arbor DDoS, from the ISP sides and from your side as a customer. Traffic analysis with Arbor DDoS is very good; it is brilliant. They act in a different way compared to others, and the vendor support is very good. The main benefits Arbor DDoS provides to users include stopping DDoS attacks, which is the biggest nightmare for all customers.

Read full review

it_user723534

Guitarist at a media company with self employed

It's not easy to get out once you're in

Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information. When you sign on for the paid service, Sitelock: * Hides (makes it difficult to find) that they default the auto-renew (you can't sign up without agreeing to have them automatically bill your credit card every year). * Hides (makes it difficult to find) how to stop auto-renew: * You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses. * You have to hunt their website for a link (in extremely small font) to the page which contains instructions for cancelling. * When you get to that page, turns out it's the 5000+ word "Terms of Service" document, which you have to scour to find a phone number. Then, you have to call and get put on hold (or if you like, they will call you back three days later). Once you finally get through, you have to jump through a lot of security hoops. All of the above, just to cancel the service. Their product may or may not be OK, but be forewarned that with Sitelock, it's not easy to get out once you're in.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What do you like most about Arbor DDoS?

The quality of the technical support provided by Arbor DDoS is premium.

See all answers

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application fi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 22% of the time

Cloudflare vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 16% of the time

Corero vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 8% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

More Arbor DDoS Competitors

Sucuri vs SiteLock

Compared 33% of the time

Cloudflare vs SiteLock

Compared 31% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs SiteLock

Compared 22% of the time

Veracode vs SiteLock

Compared 14% of the time

More SiteLock Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS

June 2025

Download Arbor DDoS product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

June 2025

Download SiteLock product report

Also Known As

Arbor Networks SP, Arbor Networks TMS, Arbor Cloud for ENT

No data available

Overview

Arbor DDoS provides effective mitigation against DDoS attacks with a user-friendly interface, integrating cloud and on-premise solutions for real-time traffic control and reporting. It supports large traffic volumes without latency, making it ideal for protecting online infrastructure.

Known for its intuitive GUI and rapid response, Arbor DDoS defends against complex DDoS threats using AI-driven anomaly detection and traffic categorization. It offers packet capture, robust reporting, and deployment flexibility, helping users maintain network stability and performance. While improvements in auto-mitigation, interface modernization, and scalability are needed, its hybrid protection approach efficiently secures networks for service providers and enterprises.

What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?

User-friendly GUI: Simplifies DDoS attack monitoring and management.
Real-time traffic visualization: Allows continuous analysis of network traffic.
BGP support: Facilitates secure routing for network infrastructure.
AI-driven anomaly detection: Identifies unusual traffic patterns promptly.
Automated threat response: Executes fast mitigation strategies.
Hybrid protection: Combines cloud and on-premise defenses.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Effective DDoS mitigation: Enhances network uptime and resilience.
Large traffic processing: Handles high volumes without latency.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different operational environments.
Comprehensive reporting: Provides insights into network security status.
Scalability: Supports growth in network demand and complexity.

Internet Service Providers and managed service providers utilize Arbor DDoS to secure network infrastructure and service availability. It's implemented in government and finance sectors for safeguarding customer websites and managing server traffic thresholds. Organizations deploy Arbor DDoS both on-premise and via cloud for extensive network protection.

NETSCOUT

Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.

SiteLock

Sample Customers

Xtel Communications

galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS vs. SiteLock

June 2025

Free Report: Arbor DDoS vs. SiteLock

Find out what your peers are saying about Arbor DDoS vs. SiteLock and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arbor DDoS vs. SiteLock report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.