We performed a comparison between Appian and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The most valuable features are the low coding and low code data."
"Appian has many valuable features, the first being the ease of development—rapid development. Second, the process of learning the product and tool is faster when compared to its peers in the market. It's closer to low-code, and while it's still not very easy, it's more low-code than other products in the industry. Appian has a good user interface, a seamless model user interface, which comes without additional coding. It can also integrate with multiple systems."
"Write to Data Store Entity - Saving data in SQL databases is done easily using entities. Entities (CDTs in Appian terminology) define relationships and target schema tables via XSD files."
"The product has a very good mobile app."
"Appian helps you do a lot of things. It's easy to configure and build an application platform, and it offers a lot of features that you find in an RPA solution. It's flexible so you can reuse it for a variety of use cases."
"The solution has a lot of strong features for the financial industry, it is very easy to use."
"Appian is a very low code platform. It's very easy to learn and use."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"The solution could use some more tutorials to help brand new users figure out how to use the product effectively."
"Something I would like to see improved is an SQL database connection."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
"Appian could improve their customer-facing initiatives."
"Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.