No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apollo GraphOS vs Kong Gateway Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apollo GraphOS
Ranking in API Management
18th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
4.1
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kong Gateway Enterprise
Ranking in API Management
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apollo GraphOS is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 3.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kong Gateway Enterprise3.9%
Apollo GraphOS0.8%
Other95.3%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Unified schemas have streamlined team collaboration and have reduced API-related deployment issues
We had a positive experience with Apollo GraphOS, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved. One area is the learning curve around GraphQL Federation and schema governance. Teams that are new to federated architectures often need to understand best practices. More guided onboarding, built-in recommendations, and practical examples would make adoption easier. I also think the observability and troubleshooting experience could be enhanced, particularly when diagnosing issues that span multiple subgraphs. While the platform provides useful insights, tracing complex requests across a federated environment can still require additional investigations. Another improvement would be more granular administrative controls and reporting, especially for larger organizations where different teams manage different parts of the GraphQL platform. Although the CI/CD integration is one of the product's strengths, having more out-of-the-box integrations and similar configurations for popular DevOps tools would reduce the initial setup effort. These suggestions would make the platform easier to adopt, operate, and scale, particularly for organizations that are beginning their GraphQL Federation journey. One thing I would like to see in future releases is deeper operational visibility for large-scale federated environments. As the number of subgraphs and development teams grows, it becomes more important to quickly identify where performance bottlenecks or schema-related issues are originating without having to correlate information from multiple tools. More built-in governance capabilities would be valuable, such as stronger policy enforcement, approval workflows for schema changes, and richer reporting for platform administrators. Another area that could be improved is the onboarding experience. While the documentation is comprehensive, having more guided setup wizards, architectures, and real-world implementation examples would help new teams become productive more quickly. I would also like to see even broader integrations with common enterprise monitoring, security, and development platforms so organizations can manage Apollo GraphOS as part of their existing operational ecosystem rather than relying on additional customization. These points would make day-to-day administration easier and improve the experience for organizations running GraphQL at a larger scale.
KS
Business Consultant at Ernst & Young
Modernization projects have progressed well but documentation and security guidance still need work
Bringing in additional features to Kong Gateway Enterprise would not necessarily help it. Improving the existing features, increasing security, and adding robustness would be more beneficial. The focus should be on stabilizing the product, improving it, and increasing the documentation. Kong should focus on how the product can be self-onboarded or self-implemented, as this would ease and help customers significantly. The necessary deployment of Kong Gateway Enterprise, API management, and guidance on how customers can use it or improve that area would be helpful. Security is a major concern, especially with new security architecture coming into place. These are the areas that should be prioritized. Beyond these areas, I do not see anything lacking. Kong Gateway Enterprise is quite comprehensive.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Apollo GraphOS has had a positive impact by improving the way we manage and evolve our GraphQL APIs."
"Apollo GraphOS has significantly enhanced both the developer experience and product delivery timelines by offering a centralized approach to managing GraphQL schemas and services, helping reduce overhead and improve collaboration between frontend and backend teams."
"Apollo GraphOS has positively impacted our organization by reducing unwanted code and helping us combine multiple services."
"The most valuable features of Apollo GraphOS OS for me are its security and authentication processes."
"Apollo GraphOS has had a positive impact on our organization by making our API development process more structured, predictable, and collaborative."
"Good at intercepting traffic and modeling APIs around that."
"The solution's technical support is good and fast in terms of responsiveness and problem-solving skills."
"In our buying companies' perspective, it was easier to use compared to other platforms. The markets were pretty familiar with the solutions."
"The tool's scalability is good...The solution's technical support is good."
"Kong's most valuable features are its lightweight performance when handling millions of requests and the ability to write custom plugins to enhance security, such as end-to-end encryption, even in the open-source version."
"Based on my experience, I would definitely recommend Kong Gateway Enterprise to other people."
"It boasts remarkable speed and stability, and these qualities, particularly the gateway's resilience, are standout features for me."
"The most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise is its capability to integrate with various security tools."
 

Cons

"There’s room for improvement in schema collaboration tools, especially in large teams where multiple developers are working on overlapping parts of the API."
"The reason I held back from giving it a perfect score is that some enterprise scenarios still require additional effort."
"Apollo GraphOS OS is using a detailed project, and it can be time-consuming because it has a lot of data to manage. It sometimes takes longer than three seconds, which can affect loading times and lead to user dissatisfaction. I would like to see improved performance."
"I rated it six out of ten because while it offers useful capabilities such as schema management, schema validation, and API observability, I feel there are several areas that need improvement."
"The tool needs to improve in areas like documentation and UI."
"Kong is meant for north-south communications, so it will be interesting to see what solutions they can come up with in the realms of east-west communications, service-to-service communications, and Zero Trust architecture. I believe that if they can provide for these areas, then they will be able to solve the overall integration and security concerns for microservices architecture in general."
"The solution should include policy features that are available in other solutions like MuleSoft API manager but missing in Kong Enterprise."
"Mainly, I would say they need to improve the updates. The updates of the OS for Fortinet seem to require a lot of bandwidth."
"There should be an easier way to integrate with other solutions, even though it's the same API solution layer. Comparability will be a good improvement."
"The open-source version of Kong does not support a dashboard, which would be very helpful."
"Kong Enterprise fails to provide live tracing of the APIs, which is possible nowadays."
"For us, implementing Kong Gateway Enterprise with existing infrastructures and the cloud in tandem requires more effort than implementing MuleSoft or Azure APIM or AWS."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It's expensive in Thailand (10 million baht, in Thai currency)."
"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."
"I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."
"The licensing fees are paid yearly."
"Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."
"The price is really reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."
"There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."
"The product is reasonably priced because it goes by the SaaS model."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
University
12%
Program Development Consultancy
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apollo GraphOS?
I am not sensitive to nor very knowledgeable about the pricing and setup cost.
What needs improvement with Apollo GraphOS?
Overall, I've had a good experience, but if I had to choose one improvement, it would be improving the onboarding and troubleshooting experience for large GraphQL environments. A better diagnostic ...
What is your primary use case for Apollo GraphOS?
My main use case for Apollo GraphOS is managing and monitoring GraphQL APIs across the development life cycle. I use it to manage our GraphQL schema, validate schema changes before deployment, and ...
How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...
What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?
Bringing in additional features to Kong Gateway Enterprise would not necessarily help it. Improving the existing features, increasing security, and adding robustness would be more beneficial. The f...
What is your primary use case for Kong Enterprise?
Our primary use cases for Kong Gateway Enterprise are modernizations, migrations, and digitalizations of financial institutions. These are the primary areas we are looking for.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner
Find out what your peers are saying about Apollo GraphOS vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.