Apiiro vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

Apiiro and Ivanti are both solutions in the Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) category. Apiiro is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.0, while Ivanti is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Apiiro and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management are both prominent in the security and asset management sector. Apiiro shines with advanced risk management solutions, while Ivanti's efficient endpoint management stands out, potentially justifying its premium cost.

Features: Apiiro's standout features include strong API visibility, centralized management for security risks, and comprehensive API traffic insights. Security-focused monitoring helps identify exposed APIs, aiding in proactive governance. Ivanti is known for AI-powered automation, robust patch management, and centralized endpoint visibility, all contributing to reduced manual work. Both solutions enhance operational efficiency and governance.

Room for Improvement: Apiiro needs to enhance integration capabilities, improve customization options, and expand reporting functionalities. Ivanti could benefit from simplifying automated processes, offering more extensive troubleshooting tools, and streamlining dashboard navigation for better user experience. Addressing these areas could further strengthen their offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apiiro's integration process is seamless, with a focus on minimizing setup time. Their proactive customer service ensures smooth deployment. Ivanti offers comprehensive support and guidance for complex setups, though its deployment is slightly more sophisticated. Their structured support effectively manages enterprise environments.

Pricing and ROI: Apiiro presents a competitive pricing model, delivering a favorable ROI through its emphasis on risk reduction. Ivanti's higher pricing is offset by its extensive feature set, promising significant long-term ROI via operational efficiencies. Both solutions offer distinct cost-benefit advantages depending on business needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto N...

Featured Reviews

Sonali Jha

Technical Solutions Architect at IBM

Cloud security has improved as AI-driven runtime protection detects threats and reduces incidents

In my opinion, Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks could be improved or enhanced in various ways. I don't have an idea about that yet because for that you actually need to use two or three different other tools to make a basic comparison. If you ask me how good the tool is, I would fairly rate it quite high. The tool is very popular, and customers can already see that it is one of the cloud leaders in the security space. The platform had a very good feature which provides documentation links about how to use a specific feature on the UI. It takes you to the proper documentation page where it suggests what to do and tells you about the steps that need to be done for a resource deployment. My thoughts about improving the product which I believe could greatly aid vendors is that it used to be a very user-friendly tool, but now they have incorporated everything under one umbrella. It has XDR, XSOAR, and Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. Before, we used to have separate modules and separate environments for each of these capabilities or features. Right now, it is a little complex and users would take their own time to know the tool better. This is something that would have been way better, but I would say there would be different opinions on this. Talking about user-friendliness, it has decreased now.

Read full review

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

reviewer2882148

Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally

In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is a technically strong product, and I rate it ten out of ten."

"I have seen several benefits from using Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks: It was easy to use and easy to migrate from the IBM platform."

"From a technical standpoint or pricing, Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is a stronger solution in the market at the moment compared to other products from ConnectWise or Symantec."

"The AI and automation features in detecting and responding to high-risk threats are impressive; it's one of the best tools regarding AI technology and unifies security in one platform in real-time, improving vulnerability analysis, incident response, and compliance reporting."

"I have absolutely seen improvements in our incident close rates, with mean time to detect and respond reduced significantly, sometimes by at least forty to fifty percent."

"The most beneficial aspect of Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Palo Alto in general is that there is a single platform for all cloud providers for securitization."

"Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has impacted our organization positively by keeping our machines secure and our team using the dashboard to find issues quickly."

"Previously with Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, I deployed this product for one of my customers, and after three to four months, they said that previously they had around four hours of MTTR, and now it has reduced to just 15 to 20 minutes."

More Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The positive impact I have seen from working with Apiiro for my company includes the metrics that we get from Apiiro, which have been extremely helpful."

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"The products are quite good when they are operational."

"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has positively impacted my organization because I used this tool in my previous project, and it is useful for security purposes."

"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."

"By moving to Intune, they were able to save the complete cost for Ivanti Neurons for UEM and put it towards something they were already paying for, and additionally they improved enrollment deployment time significantly and now can deploy laptops in an hour and even give the task to end users."

"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."

"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."

"AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work."

"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

Cons

"As per my experience with Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, the UI could be simpler."

"Overall, I rate Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks as an eight out of ten. I think that it could improve on price, as I know that the Google solution has the best price, and this is one of the conditions."

"My thoughts about improving the product which I believe could greatly aid vendors is that it used to be a very user-friendly tool, but now they have incorporated everything under one umbrella."

"Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is not the cheapest solution in the market, but I know that is the best solution for SOC and Cloud once have all tools to connect cloud issues with SOC procedures, because we are partners with T-Systems."

"Some aspects of the GUI can be confusing and make it difficult for me to find certain options or navigate where needed."

"The negative aspects or areas for improvement in the product include the fact that the cost might be a bit high, which challenges commercials, but not technically."

"The pricing is high, making ROI challenging to justify, especially during transitions between solutions."

"Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is creating some confusion in terms of names because this is recent."

More Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks cons

"My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"In terms of improvements for Ivanti Neurons for UEM, the only challenge I face with EPM Endpoint Manager is in scanning network devices, as some devices appear without a serial number, which is an issue that takes more time since customers often require the serial number as a mandatory field."

"Sometimes there is a lag with the environment, and we need to refresh before using it."

"We have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement."

"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."

"I also found the UI to be quite complicated to work with, so it takes quite a bit of time to train any new staff and to get them to understand how the solution works."

"The disadvantage in connection with Windows devices is that the pushing of policies takes some time."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is affordable."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?

I am not fully aware of the pricing and licensing of Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. The pricing is also based on...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?

In my opinion, Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks could be improved or enhanced in various ways. I don't have an idea...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?

The usual use cases for Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks that I have been working with mostly are as simple as dete...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

One area Apiiro could improve is reporting customization and dashboard flexibility with more advanced filtering and e...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apiiro?

Apiiro is primarily used for code scanning and integration with source code control. The main use cases include code ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Apiiro?

I would highly recommend Apiiro and a clear understanding of the API landscape and integration requirements before im...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

I use Ivanti Neurons for UEM for mobile device management, and I can describe the use case. The remote device managem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 11% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) vs Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 7% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 12% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Apiiro

Compared 4% of the time

Kondukto vs Apiiro

Compared 4% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 8% of the time

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

August 2026

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks report

Download Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

August 2026

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

August 2026

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Palo Alto Networks

Demo not available

Apiiro

Ivanti

Overview

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks enhances cloud security with features like AI/ML threat detection and automated remediation, ensuring real-time protection and efficient management across cloud environments.

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers comprehensive cloud security posture management and runtime protection. It reduces manual tasks and accelerates incident investigation through advanced threat detection and AI-driven anomaly detection. With integration to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, it boosts threat response while reducing incident resolution time. Although users find the UI complex and pricing high, its capabilities in securing AWS, Azure, and other environments, as well as its potential integration with CyberArk, emphasize its enterprise-ready design for cloud transformation across diverse industry sectors.

What are the key features of Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?

Runtime Protection: Ensures real-time security for workloads.
AI/ML-powered Threat Detection: Identifies threats using AI/ML technology.
Automated Remediation: Streamlines threat response through automation.
Comprehensive Detection Coverage: Offers extensive detection capabilities with unified data.
Integration with MITRE ATT&CK: Enhances threat response efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security Visibility: Provides dashboards for better security insights.
Reduced Manual Tasks: Automates processes for efficiency gains.
Improved Threat Response: Accelerates incident resolution with AI-driven anomaly detection.
Seamless Cloud Integration: Supports APIs and multi-cloud environments.

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is deployed across industries like telecom, BFSI, and manufacturing for robust cloud security. It's leveraged for detecting misconfigurations and vulnerabilities, aiding cloud transformation and compliance with standards such as GDPR and NIST. The integration across cloud infrastructures, including AWS and Azure, supports policy creation and threat management strategies for diverse enterprises.

Palo Alto Networks

Apiiro fosters seamless integration of security into the software development lifecycle, enhancing compliance and risk management through continuous code risk assessments.

Apiiro addresses security challenges by providing a robust platform that continuously monitors and assesses code risks. It integrates security directly into development processes to ensure compliance and reduce risk. By leveraging this approach, teams can manage risks proactively, safeguard applications, and enhance overall development efficiency.

What features make Apiiro valuable?

Continuous Code Risk Assessment: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities throughout the development lifecycle.
Integrated Compliance Automation: Streamlines compliance with various standards by automating checks and balances.
Contextual Insights: Delivers meaningful insights to facilitate informed decision-making on security practices.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork by aligning security teams with development workflows.

What benefits should you evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Frequent assessments lead to improved code quality and reduced vulnerabilities.
Risk Management Efficiency: Real-time analytics offer proactive risk mitigation, saving time and resources.
Accelerated Development: Automated processes enable faster and more secure software delivery.
Reduced Compliance Costs: Automated checks decrease compliance-related expenses.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Apiiro's integration improves compliance and security standards due to heightened regulatory requirements. Its risk-focused approach empowers these industries to secure data and meet stringent security requirements effectively.

Apiiro

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

Frontier Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.