Apica vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM comparison

Apica and Logsign are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while Logsign is ranked #37 with an average rating of 7.7. Apica holds a 0.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Logsign’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Logsign users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

1,227 Views
466 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Read 4 Logsign Next-Gen SIEM reviews

936 Views
674 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apica

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and Apica are key players in IT infrastructure monitoring solutions. User feedback suggests Apica holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive features.

Features: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is known for effective threat detection, intuitive dashboard design, and cost efficiency. Apica stands out with detailed performance monitoring capabilities, extensive integrations, and feature-rich solutions favored by users.

Room for Improvement: Logsign needs better integration options, more sophisticated analytics, and improved reporting tools. Apica could enhance its reporting tools, reduce alert noise, and refine its alert system.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logsign offers straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. Apica provides a robust support system but has a more complex initial deployment process. Logsign is often easier for quick onboarding, while Apica requires more setup time.

Pricing and ROI: Logsign is seen as cost-effective with a favorable ROI, appealing to those with budget constraints. Apica, while more expensive, is perceived to deliver significant long-term value, attractive to businesses prioritizing feature depth and return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (16th), IT Operations Analytics (6th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Ranking in Log Management

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Apica	0.3%
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM	0.5%
Other	99.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Ayaz Ahmed

Cyber Security Specialist at lums

Works well for threat detection and security

Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively. There should be a focus on delivering alerts tailored to specific needs rather than overwhelming users with numerous alerts. Additionally, incorporating more mature data about threats is necessary for better threat detection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution captures all our requests and responses."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps."

"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."

"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."

"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."

"It helps with releases because we monitor them in staging. We can tell if something is critically wrong before it gets into production, e.g., if it was load related or function related and also what was different in the dev stage. It then alerts us straightaway inside of our production monitors once it has been released. Therefore, it has improved how we run our systems since we monitor multiple environments."

"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."

More Apica pros

"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."

"It has full automation and automated SIEM responses."

"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."

Cons

"The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"If you are adding any input file, the tool fails to capture the path."

"The accuracy of alerts can be improved a little bit. Right now, it's pretty good in terms of alerting pretty quickly about failures or changes in response times. However, what we have seen happen is the number of alerts that we are getting is very frequent, and we would like to tone down the number of alerts. That's the only trouble we have. Apica could tone down those settings because there is no option for us to tone it down to a level that would reduce the alerts to a minimum. As a platform, it does send us good alerts, but it could be improved a bit."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"Learning the tool has always been a little difficult from a scripting perspective because the framework is proprietary and unique. Once we became used to what it does and how to perform it, then it became easier for my team and me. I would like to see some of the testing steps be part of a more well-known language, like Java or Python. That would be a big improvement."

"The customer service and support were a little slow to respond. The browser sometimes checks alerts on unknown issues like latency from Apica's side."

"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."

More Apica cons

"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."

"AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine."

"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"Compared to other SIEMs, it has low pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Media Company

11%

Insurance Company

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	17

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

It does not have much AI and machine learning features yet. They are developing them and will be releasing them in a few months.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

We use Logsign SIEM for various tasks in our daily operations. One key use case is for forensic analysis. We also use it to monitor critical servers and generate security alerts for actions like lo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine. I can recommend it. Not for large enterp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 27% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 14% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 23% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 14% of the time

Falcon LogScale vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 12% of the time

Wazuh vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 10% of the time

More Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

October 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2025

Download Logsign Next-Gen SIEM product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?

Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally

Which benefits should users expect from Apica?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

Logsign delivers automation-driven cyber security solutions and are committed to providing the smartest, easiest-to-use and most affordable cybersecurity detection and response solutions and value-added services. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is an enterprise-grade SIEM, inline with our promise, it's easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable unlike the other enterprise-grade SIEM softwares.

Easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable SIEM for all.
Unlimited scalability, high availability - cluster SIEM, big data infrastructure.
Deploy on every environment, on-premise solution.
400+ predefined integrations and free plugin service.
Collects & stores unlimited data.
Threat hunting, fast search & investigation, advanced behavior analysis, IOC detection.
Real-time detection & prevention, wide correlation library based on Mitre Att&ck framework.
Real-time monitoring, predefined dashboards & reports, meeting compliance requirements (PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOX and more).
Automated notifications, automated actions.
Flexible pricing options, and more information and for more automated response features, please look for our SOAR platform.

Logsign

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Turkish Petroleum, Tırsan, DP World, SAC American Colleges, Robert College, Unlu&Co, UniCo Insurance Company, ETSTur, CK Energy, UEDAS Energy, Wilo, Eurocross Assistance, Deloitte Turkey, Incı GS Yuasa, Pappara, Bilgi University, Anadolu University, İstanbul University, The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, TRT, Anadolu Media Agency, Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services, Ispark, Spor AS and wide range of enterprises in different industries.

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

September 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.