Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Kafka
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (8th)
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Apache Kafka and Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Apache Kafka is designed for Streaming Analytics and holds a mindshare of 3.9%, up 2.1% compared to last year.
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS, on the other hand, focuses on Message Queue (MQ) Software, holds 0.6% mindshare, up 0.4% since last year.
Streaming Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Apache Kafka3.9%
Apache Flink14.4%
Databricks11.8%
Other69.9%
Streaming Analytics
Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS0.6%
IBM MQ24.7%
ActiveMQ24.2%
Other50.5%
Message Queue (MQ) Software
 

Featured Reviews

Snehasish Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Data streaming transforms real-time data movement with impressive scalability
I worked with Apache Kafka for customers in the financial industry and OTT platforms. They use Kafka particularly for data streaming. Companies offering movie and entertainment as a service, similar to Netflix, use Kafka Apache Kafka offers unique data streaming. It allows the use of data in…
AR
It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia
We have an application-presentation layer, and we use JBoss to communicate with the application layer. The interceptors use Active MQ.  JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support.  JBoss could add more automation. We have been using JBoss for five…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution revolve around areas like the latency part, where the tool offers very little latency and the sequencing part."
"The ability to partition data on Kafka is valuable."
"Kafka can process messages in real-time, making it useful for applications that require near-instantaneous processing."
"The solution is very scalable. We started with a cluster of three and then scaled it to seven."
"It eases our current data flow and framework."
"For example, when you want to send a message to inform all your clients about a new feature, you can publish that message to a single topic in Apache Kafka. This allows all clients subscribed to that topic to receive the message. On the other hand, if you need to send billing information to a specific customer, you can publish that message on a topic dedicated to that customer. This message can then be sent as an SMS to the customer, allowing them to view it on their mobile device."
"It's very easy to keep to install and it's pretty stable."
"I have seen a return on investment with this solution."
"JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."
 

Cons

"Maintaining and configuring Apache Kafka can be challenging, especially when you want to fine-tune its behavior."
"Apache Kafka could improve data loss and compatibility with Spark."
"Prioritization of messages in Apache Kafka could improve."
"In the data sharing space, the performance of Apache Kafka could be improved. The performance angle is critical, and while it works in milliseconds, the goal is to move towards microseconds."
"It's not possible to substitute IBM MQ with Apache Kafka because the JMS part is not very stable."
"Kafka is complex and there is a little bit of a learning curve."
"Lacks elasticity and the ability to scale down."
"Pulsar gives more scalability to an even grouping, but Apache Kafka is used more if you want to send something in a time series-based. If this does not matter to you then Pulsar could be more customizable. Apache Kafka is nothing but a streaming system with local storage."
"JBoss could add more automation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the free version of Apache Kafka."
"I would not subscribe to the Confluent platform, but rather stay on the free open source version. The extra cost wasn't justified."
"I rate Apache Kafka's pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. There are no additional costs apart from the licensing fees for Apache Kafka."
"It's a premium product, so it is not price-effective for us."
"We use the free version."
"Running a Kafka cluster can be expensive, especially if you need to scale it up to handle large amounts of data."
"The price of the solution is low."
"It's a bit cheaper compared to other Q applications."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise47
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What are the differences between Apache Kafka and IBM MQ?
Apache Kafka is open source and can be used for free. It has very good log management and has a way to store the data used for analytics. Apache Kafka is very good if you have a high number of user...
What do you like most about Apache Kafka?
Apache Kafka is an open-source solution that can be used for messaging or event processing.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Kafka?
Its pricing is reasonable. It's not always about cost, but about meeting specific needs.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Uber, Netflix, Activision, Spotify, Slack, Pinterest
E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: October 2025.
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.