Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Anvilogic vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Anvilogic
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
AI-SOC (2nd)
IBM Security QRadar
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
211
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (7th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (18th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (4th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (8th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Anvilogic is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security QRadar is 7.0%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Security QRadar7.0%
Anvilogic0.3%
Other92.7%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Jason Murphy - PeerSpot reviewer
Improves SOC response times and simplifies alert management through efficient customization
The 'we need something better' moment was triggered when we were trying to roll out custom alerts with Splunk Enterprise Security; it was atrocious to do that. You would have to clone things and then reuse alerts you made. Just making new alerts, the process was not very good, and there was no versioning for all the alerts we create. So we had to trust Splunk for what they created. Rolling out new alerts was a pain since you had to load them up in a new app and things similar to that. With Anvilogic, they made it super simple. I can describe a process where they have something they refer to as the Armory. You just go to the Armory, click all the things you want. It automatically pushes it down to your Splunk Enterprise with their app loaded up on there if you modify it as needed. It tends to just work, and you can customize it easily since it tells you the Splunk language plus the normal human language. So it makes modifying it simple with rollback versioning. They have groups based on known attackers coming for you, and you can group them together that way and deploy a whole set of alerts designed just for those specific use cases of those attackers and their IOCs. Aside from the easy custom alerting with Anvilogic, the next feature I appreciate most is that they also standardized bringing in the logs. They set some macros that help standardize and make more sense than Splunk. They teach you and give you insights every morning or every week, saying, 'Hey, this is not working, so what do you want. You're getting one or two of these alerts per day. Do you want to squash them from error to warning?' They're always giving you tips on how to improve the efficiency of the system itself. Creating scenarios was amazing. In Anvilogic's case, you create scenarios based on MITRE ATT&CK framework. Every rule that fits that MITRE will get used. My usage with Anvilogic has evolved since onboarding. After about two or three years, they started offering their cloud-based SOC where instead of just using Splunk as a data set, you could run your searches against Snowflake databases, Demisto, and others including Azure log storage. Their generative AI work has been fantastic as it's very specific in what you need to do. The route they've gone with the different types of AI agents aligns exactly with what I was hoping the market would do. Seeing them do the Tier Zero for SOC-type stuff with their playbooks has been impressive. Since adopting Anvilogic, our team's quick SOC response has become essential. We have been known to respond within five to seven minutes to an attacker compromising an account.
Mahmoud Younes - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable installation and diverse use cases provide strong value
IBM Security QRadar has some areas for improvement. We have missed some DSM components. We need to customize logs where there is no DSM or connector for certain products. We can integrate but we have missed the DSM, which is the connector to pass logs coming from different applications. For example, with a university customer, we tried onboarding Canvas service. IBM Security QRadar does not support Canvas, so we had to create custom scripts and workarounds to pull logs from Canvas.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We are partnering very closely with Anvilogic and pushing the threshold of detection engineering capabilities; we are only able to do many of these capabilities due to the partnership that we have with Anvilogic, where they are meeting what we need to continually push new innovative solutions."
"Before Anvilogic, we had no visibility into our detection coverage. The ability to break it down by industry verticals, such as attackers and adversaries, is valuable."
"They teach you and give you insights every morning or every week, saying, 'Hey, this is not working, so what do you want. You're getting one or two of these alerts per day. Do you want to squash them from error to warning?' They're always giving you tips on how to improve the efficiency of the system itself."
"One of the best things about Anvilogic is the partnership, their knowledge, the depth of technical understanding, and the speed at which they respond."
"The deployment was very simple."
"Most of the features are good. It is an excellent solution."
"Provided that the report is prebuilt and I can find what I am looking for, the reporting is the most valuable feature in this solution."
"The product can scale."
"The stability is good."
"IBM Qradar's ability to simplify the number of events, not only on a technical level but by making that information easy to pan through the orchestration deduplication. It is very impressive given that we have hundreds of devices that send event logs through."
"I have found IBM QRadar to be stable."
"The most valuable features are log monitoring, easy-to-fix issues, and problem-solving."
"The detection rate is good and the false positive rate is low."
 

Cons

"Anvilogic could be better in areas of the triage dashboard as they're beholden to Splunk's functionality."
"The pricing is slightly edging towards being a bit much for smaller organizations."
"The hunting insight needs integrable capability with different platforms to gather all of that insight and show it on a single canvas on Anvilogic. That is the only feature that could improve the way we do operations."
"Anvilogic can be improved by adding the ability to do on-ingest detections. This is something that we have been having a conversation on for a short time now, but I am hopeful that they will have that in their future roadmap."
"There are a lot of things they are working on and a lot of technologies that are not yet there. They should probably work out a better reserve with their ecosystem of business partners and create wider and more in-depth qualities, third-party tools, and add-ons. These things really give immediate business value. For instance, there are many limitations in using SAP, EBS, or Micro-Dynamics. A lot of things that are happening in those platforms could also be monitored and allowed from the cybersecurity risks perspective. IBM might be leaving this gap or empty space for business partners. Some larger organizations might already be doing this. It would be very nice if IBM can make some artificial intelligence part free of charge for all current QRadar users. This would be a big advantage as compared to other competitors. There are companies that are going in different directions. Of course, you can't do everything inside QRadar. In general, it might be very good for all players to provide more use cases, especially regarding data protection and leakage prevention. There are some who are already doing some kind of file integrity or gathering some more information from all possible technologies for building anything related to the user and data analysis, content analysis, and management regarding the data protection."
"Pricing model could be more cost-effective."
"The released patch quality is poor. IBM should test those patches on their side, not on the client's side."
"Communication between the silos sometimes becomes an issue, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Dashboards and reports could provide better visualization of SIEM activity."
"With IBM Security QRadar, my company faced issues with the support we received for the product."
"It would be good if the program allowed certain profiles to only see certain customer information."
"I don't look at only the features and benefits; I also look at the price. It is a bit expensive when compared with other solutions. It is expensive for specific deployment topologies, and the decision-makers go for alternatives like ArcSight. It should also have more AI features or capabilities for better threat intelligence. The more it uses machine learning, the better would be the dashboard, analytics, and other things."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Anvilogic's pricing has been highly competitive."
"We were an early adopter, so the pricing was definitely good. Because they do not completely replace a SIEM, their pricing is slowly edging towards being a little too much for a smaller organization like ours. It is almost on the border."
"It is cheaper than ArcSight."
"QRadar UBA's price is a little more than street price and could be reduced."
"I feel that the price is reasonable but compared to other products that are on the market, such as an offering by Microsoft, it is more expensive."
"It is expensive. It is not a product that I can provide for SMBs. It is a program that I can only provide for really large enterprises."
"The solution's pricing is based on the EPS model."
"IBM Security QRadar is a very expensive tool."
"Licensing can be costly depending on your architecture."
"It is costlier as compared to the other alternatives available in the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business89
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise102
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anvilogic?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Anvilogic was the easiest experience I have ever had.
What needs improvement with Anvilogic?
Anvilogic could be better in areas of the triage dashboard as they're beholden to Splunk's functionality. I need to click three times to get to all the information I need. Enterprise Security did t...
What is your primary use case for Anvilogic?
My main use case for Anvilogic is for triage in the SOC. That's the primary use case.
What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Security QRadar?
When comparing with Splunk, IBM Security QRadar's cost is reasonable. Splunk is more expensive than IBM Security QRadar.
 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
Find out what your peers are saying about Anvilogic vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.