No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Android SDK vs Codename One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Android SDK
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.9
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Codename One
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of Android SDK is 7.0%, down from 24.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Codename One is 4.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Android SDK7.0%
Codename One4.2%
Other88.8%
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer (Kony-Temenos | Android) at Xpert Digital
A stable and scalable product that offers ease of coding and designing to build applications
There isn't a need for any improvement in Android SDK since they provide users with two or three updates in a year, making it quite stable. The security part in Android SDK depends on how you build an application using the tool so you can apply some security to your application. The reason why Temenos Quantum is the best security tool is because it uses a middleware named Fabric, so the APIs are connected from Fabric to Temenos Quantum. The middleware offered by Temenos is really strong. If I compare the security offered by Android to that of Temenos Quantum, Android will lose in terms of security. You can create a secure application with Android SDK. The amount of security offered by Android SDK is less when compared to Temenos, making it an area of concern where improvement can be made. I don't think Android SDK needs to add any features because they give updates frequently.
it_user480888 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chicken Little at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications.
Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications I ported a couple of large-ish real world Java applications, and maintained a common code base. Future development continues, fully cross platform, on standard desktop Java, Android and iOS. Core Java features are not…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Supports mobile and IOT devices."
"The look, ease of use, sturdiness, and reliability are excellent."
"I have found the functions related to the services to the community for applications to be the most valuable."
"No doubt about the customer service its always great."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a stable product."
"It is a fantastic platform for the development of native applications, and the look, ease of use, sturdiness, and reliability are excellent."
"The Near Field Communication feature is its most valuable feature."
"Being an Android developer this SDK platform will continue to grow as the developer community invests in it."
"A few things that stand out to me are a well-documented and pretty extensive API, build server, access to native functionality via native interface, easy extension with third-party libraries, active developer support, and attractive pricing."
"Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications."
"To the best of my knowledge CN1 is better than some of the available mobile app development frameworks such as Xamarin and Nativescript because it gives almost 100% -- if not 100% -- write once run anywhere."
 

Cons

"The development environment of Android SDK could improve."
"Emulators are slow, especially the ones above API level 12 (Tablets and ICS). Slow emulators can really hinder the process of development."
"The development environment of Android SDK could improve."
"Android SDK could be better if its integration for Flutter was improved; I understand it is tailored for Kotlin and Java apps, but many of us are using Flutter."
"It is an excellent solution, and it would be nice to get fewer updates."
"UI needs to improve, I feel since I come from a Microsoft RAD developer environment."
"I am still expecting Android SDK to incorporate flash or similar video tool capabilities."
"Google has a monopoly on tools for Android app development, so Android SDK is the only choice available."
"Core Java features are not fully supported (introspection, serialization) and many standard functionalities (windows, events) are implemented in an idiosyncratic way, not standard Java."
"Testing through a CLI simulator is free but difficult to setup."
"Windows Phone port. However, that is actively being improved and should be released later this year if all goes well."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Many countries, even those with fewer resources, prefer using Android SDK because it is cheap."
"It is an open-source platform."
"Android SDK can be cheap and can go high in terms of prices, and it all depends on who the customers are and what kind of application you want. One application may cost 5,000 USD and can go up from 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 USD."
"Android SDK is essentially an open-source product on which anybody can work."
"I am using the free version of Android SDK."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Android SDK?
In terms of pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Android SDK, it is quite cheap; I did not spend much and even received vouchers for Gemini Pro.
What needs improvement with Android SDK?
Android SDK could be better if its integration for Flutter was improved; I understand it is tailored for Kotlin and Java apps, but many of us are using Flutter. When working on a Flutter project, I...
What is your primary use case for Android SDK?
My main use case for Android SDK is writing code and developing apps, including developing some Java apps, Kotlin apps, and apps using Flutter and Dart. In addition to that, I also use the integrat...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Pmovil, Chemetall Italia SRL, BOi Global Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Android SDK vs. Codename One and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.