No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Android SDK vs SAP Mobile Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Android SDK
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.9
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Mobile Platform
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of Android SDK is 7.0%, down from 24.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Mobile Platform is 5.9%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Android SDK7.0%
SAP Mobile Platform5.9%
Other87.1%
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer (Kony-Temenos | Android) at Xpert Digital
A stable and scalable product that offers ease of coding and designing to build applications
There isn't a need for any improvement in Android SDK since they provide users with two or three updates in a year, making it quite stable. The security part in Android SDK depends on how you build an application using the tool so you can apply some security to your application. The reason why Temenos Quantum is the best security tool is because it uses a middleware named Fabric, so the APIs are connected from Fabric to Temenos Quantum. The middleware offered by Temenos is really strong. If I compare the security offered by Android to that of Temenos Quantum, Android will lose in terms of security. You can create a secure application with Android SDK. The amount of security offered by Android SDK is less when compared to Temenos, making it an area of concern where improvement can be made. I don't think Android SDK needs to add any features because they give updates frequently.
ShahzadRafique - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Product strategy (Mobility & Islamic Banking) at AutoSoft Dynamics Pvt Ltd
Have faced challenges continuing use due to support discontinuation despite past effectiveness
There was no reporting functionality in the version we used. It all had to be done by another BI or reporting platform, so we used to actually migrate data from SAP Mobile Platform to that platform. Inherently, that product at that time had no reporting capabilities. It had to be done through some other platform. The only issue arose when SAP actually marked it as end-of-support. Otherwise, as a platform, it was fantastic. I don't think there was any major concern we had with the product itself. But when you mark any platform as end-of-support and we, being the OEM partners, it definitely created significant challenges for us.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Being an Android developer this SDK platform will continue to grow as the developer community invests in it."
"Applications built with Android SDK can run on a large number of devices from various vendors and are not restricted to a particular vendor"
"The Near Field Communication feature is its most valuable feature."
"A very good mobile app development platform with support for developing on various platforms like Wiindows, Linux, Mac, etc."
"Android SDK's best feature is its ease of use."
"No doubt about the customer service its always great."
"The best thing about Android SDK is its extensive graphics compared to iOS."
"It is a fantastic platform for the development of native applications, and the look, ease of use, sturdiness, and reliability are excellent."
"The initial setup is not overly complex."
"It's a wonderful solution from a design perspective and from a scalability perspective."
"Both platforms, the SAP Mobile Platform, and SAP, are highly valuable for our company because they facilitate integration, which can be expensive. It's very convenient to connect and create billing accounts through the SAP Mobile Platform."
"One valuable feature of SAP Mobile Platform is its enterprise-grade standard and maintained APIs, available out of the box for easy integration with various systems."
"Solid development platform that allows you to automate functions from different backend systems."
"Technical support is helpful."
"Ericsson is still working in Pakistan, running one of the biggest mobile wallet platforms in the country, and if SAP hadn't marked it as end-of-life, we could have penetrated this market for at least two to three more customers."
"Ericsson is still working in Pakistan, running one of the biggest mobile wallet platforms in the country, and if SAP hadn't marked it as end-of-life, we could have penetrated this market for at least two to three more customers."
 

Cons

"Much more work and knowledge involved."
"The development environment of Android SDK could improve."
"Android SDK could use some new features, for example, picture-in-picture."
"Android SDK could be better if its integration for Flutter was improved; I understand it is tailored for Kotlin and Java apps, but many of us are using Flutter."
"Having the applications coded in Java is also a con, because Java can be annoying to code in sometimes."
"There are security issues in the Android platform."
"We encounter compatibility issues between the product and the device from the manufacturer."
"I am still expecting Android SDK to incorporate flash or similar video tool capabilities."
"One drawback is that SAP Mobile Platform apps are only available through the browser, making offline capability more challenging to implement."
"The cost of the SAP Mobile Platform is high, and there is room for improvement in its pricing."
"The only issue arose when SAP actually marked it as end-of-support. Otherwise, as a platform, it was fantastic."
"The tool is not easy or simple to integrate with other infrastructures."
"The licensing model is a bit dated."
"Installation is extremely painful."
"SAP has announced that they'll be ending the support on the SAP platform."
"If I have to go for hybrid development, it is still too complex of development, per se."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source platform."
"Android SDK is essentially an open-source product on which anybody can work."
"Android SDK can be cheap and can go high in terms of prices, and it all depends on who the customers are and what kind of application you want. One application may cost 5,000 USD and can go up from 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 USD."
"Many countries, even those with fewer resources, prefer using Android SDK because it is cheap."
"I am using the free version of Android SDK."
"If you already paying for an SAP license and have SAP products that you are using, the price for SAP Mobile Platform is negligible."
"The tool is expensive. I rate the tool's price as an eight or nine out of ten."
"The cost of SAP is extremely high, and it's not affordable for everyone."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
892,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
11%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Retailer
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Android SDK?
In terms of pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Android SDK, it is quite cheap; I did not spend much and even received vouchers for Gemini Pro.
What needs improvement with Android SDK?
Android SDK could be better if its integration for Flutter was improved; I understand it is tailored for Kotlin and Java apps, but many of us are using Flutter. When working on a Flutter project, I...
What is your primary use case for Android SDK?
My main use case for Android SDK is writing code and developing apps, including developing some Java apps, Kotlin apps, and apps using Flutter and Dart. In addition to that, I also use the integrat...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Mobile Platform?
The tool is expensive. I rate the tool's price as an eight or nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with SAP Mobile Platform?
There was no reporting functionality in the version we used. It all had to be done by another BI or reporting platform, so we used to actually migrate data from SAP Mobile Platform to that platform...
What is your primary use case for SAP Mobile Platform?
It was basically for branchless banking and mobile wallet. There are multiple use cases built on top of that including agent banking, wallet transactions, fund transfers, merchant payments, and all...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP Syclo Agentry Mobile Platform, Sybase Mobile Development Platform, Sybase Unwired Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Swarovski, CareFusion Corp., Adarsh Credit Co-operative Society Ltd.
Find out what your peers are saying about Android SDK vs. SAP Mobile Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
892,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.