Amazon RDS on Outposts vs MariaDB comparison

Read 59 MariaDB reviews

6,650 Views
4,190 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS on Outposts

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MariaDB and Amazon RDS on Outposts are competitive database solutions in the cloud and hybrid cloud environments. Amazon RDS on Outposts seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features, integration capabilities, and support resources.

Features: MariaDB offers an open-source model, extensive compatibility, and flexibility, making it a versatile choice. Amazon RDS on Outposts provides integration with AWS services, scalability, and secure data management suitable for hybrid cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MariaDB provides easy deployment with on-premise and cloud options supported by a strong community. Amazon RDS on Outposts, designed for seamless AWS integration, simplifies deployments within AWS environments with comprehensive support, though it may present a learning curve for those unfamiliar with AWS.

Pricing and ROI: MariaDB is valued for lower setup costs and potential for substantial ROI, benefiting companies with budget constraints or those favoring open-source solutions. Amazon RDS on Outposts incurs higher costs due to AWS infrastructure but offers potential long-term ROI through enhanced features and performance, appealing to businesses integrated into AWS ecosystems.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS on Outposts vs. MariaDB Report (Updated: July 2025).

Amazon RDS on Outposts vs. MariaDB

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS on Outposts

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MariaDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS on Outposts is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MariaDB is 6.3%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Henry Rivera

Solutions Architect at 3t Solutions

Used to support websites and reduces the configuration and maintenance of the database

The solution's initial setup is complex. You have to understand networking when filling out a form to create your RDS. You have to understand a few things. They've made some steps to make it easier, but the person who creates the RDS has to make some irrevocable decisions. They can't be configured afterward. The person who utilizes it has to understand a few things, like networking security and database engines. The solution's deployment has a learning curve, and you have to do it a couple of times to understand exactly what it is and what you want. The deployment is pretty fast and straightforward once you understand the parameters of what you're trying to deploy. Understanding what you're doing probably takes the longest part. If you make any mistakes, you might have to redo it or configure it differently. It's great for those who can afford it. In my business practice, I make sure I can afford a test sandbox so that my mistakes don't impact production. I vet it all out in a different environment before I touch production.

Read full review

KumarManish

Senior Technical Manager at Johnson Controls, Inc.

Easy to deploy, cost-effective, and integrates seamlessly with other products

We had planned for an RDBMS version and not NoSQL. We use MariaDB Galera Cluster. It's a good product. It is cheap, scalable, performs well, and is efficient. We use GCP’s BigQuery for machine learning. We must follow the best practices of the tool. We missed some best practices like the storage engine and InnoDB. It was very difficult to identify why we were having performance issues. Then, we realized that some of our tables were still on MyISAM, the default storage engine. When we switched it back to the InnoDB, it was very smooth. InnoDB is the recommended one. We must follow the best practices given in the documentation during the initial setup. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to manage."

"The solution reduces the configuration and maintenance of the database."

"The product's initial setup phase is simple and straightforward."

"The scalability and cost-effectiveness of AWS were beneficial during spikes in database usage, as it allowed our platform to adjust and remain operational."

"I would say that for most use cases it works fine."

"We use MariaDB for identity provider services. Most of the things that we are doing are deployed in the container mode. All such solutions require a database, and MariaDB is easier to use for these kinds of deployments."

"The most valuable feature of MariaDB is the replication mode."

"We like the easy way that we can collect data from other databases."

"The solution has PL/SQL compatibility."

"MariaDB can solve things better than MySQL. Maria DB has better performance than MySQL."

"There is the need for a robust IDE for MongoDB. The existing PHP admin console doesn't meet the client's requirements effectively."

"Great monitoring and performance stability."

More MariaDB pros

Cons

"The tool should include features to clone the RDS instances and have more central management for a lot of RDSs, not just every instance."

"If our database is too big, we sometimes face glitches in it."

"I would like to see some improvements in its version upgrades because its upgrade from MySQL 5.7 to MySQL 8 was not straightforward."

"I find the pricing to be expensive."

"Replication could be better, and it's not so simple. It would be better if they had a replication server. It would make things a lot easier. You need to have that replication server, but not in the same server farm. Then there will be a bit of latency between both because you should have one in one city and another one in a different city. That kind of solution should be more baked into every single database today. Mirroring the database in a live environment where any record written on the production server replicates instantly across the fiber on the other server wasn't easy. Many people don't even bother with that, and they just run one server."

"When we have had issues with accidental computer shutdown or a power outage, our MariaDB database was corrupted."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements in the scalability and redundancy features."

"The interface should be more user-friendly. It should be able to connect directly to the database and Interact with it without having to use commands. It needs better integration."

"I'd like to see improved materialized views, like the ability to save select queries. This feature is missing in MariaDB compared to other relational databases like Oracle and SQL Server."

"It does not have tools for debugging procedures and functions."

"The configuration could be improved. It should be easier."

"I would like to see a better user interface which would make the tool less complex."

More MariaDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licenses are included with the subscription my company purchases from Amazon."

"The solution can get expensive fast."

"Amazon RDS on Outposts is expensive compared to other solutions."

"I rate the product's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is high price since there are some support costs involved, even though it isn't an open-source solution."

"There is a monthly subscription to use MariaDB."

"MariaDB is an open-source software, meaning I don't need to pay for the product."

"The solution is free, but if you want the enterprise version you will need to pay for some licenses but the cost is less than other solutions, such as Oracle."

"The licensing cost is approximately $4000.00 per year and the licensing is based on the software and the number of posts that you make."

"MariaDB is open-source and self-hosted."

"The price of this solution represents a very good compromise between the cost and what it offers."

"The price could be less expensive."

More MariaDB pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS on Outposts?

The pricing is high compared to other solutions. AWS support is beneficial yet hard to reach. I rate the pricing as eight out of ten.

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS on Outposts?

I find the pricing to be expensive. I have had issues with support from AWS, as I am often directed to documentation instead of speaking directly to someone, which can be time-consuming. Better sup...

What is your primary use case for Amazon RDS on Outposts?

I am building servers for SaaS applications.

What do you like most about MariaDB?

The integration with other products is seamless.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MariaDB?

I have found the price of commercial MariaDB to be pretty steep, although not as high as Oracle. Customers often prefer the Community Edition because it's free.

What needs improvement with MariaDB?

The only potential area for improvement could be the pricing model, which might benefit from being more flexible or a bit cheaper.

Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS on Outposts

Comparisons

Compared 100% of the time

More Amazon RDS on Outposts Competitors

Firebird SQL vs MariaDB

Compared 23% of the time

SQL Server vs MariaDB

Compared 22% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MariaDB

Compared 14% of the time

MySQL vs MariaDB

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Database vs MariaDB

Compared 8% of the time

More MariaDB Competitors

Product Reports

Relational Databases Tools

August 2025

Download Amazon RDS on Outposts product report

Download MariaDB product report

August 2025

Overview

Amazon RDS on Outposts extends AWS cloud benefits to on-premises setups, offering seamless database management with low latency. It's tailored for users requiring consistent infrastructure technologies both on-premises and in the cloud.

Designed to provide managed database services using the familiar AWS ecosystem, Amazon RDS on Outposts supports popular databases such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server. It delivers the same AWS APIs, functionalities, and tools for a unified experience. This setup is ideal for latency-sensitive applications that need to remain on-site yet benefit from the scalability, reliability, and automation of managed services.

What features define Amazon RDS on Outposts?

Seamless Integration: Supports consistent AWS tools and interfaces, enabling easy management of database activities.
Automated Patch Management: Reduces downtime risks and maintenance efforts by automating software patching.
Security Compliance: Offers data encryption at rest and in transit, ensuring robust data protection.
Backup Automation: Facilitates reliable data recovery through automatic, user-defined backups.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Latency: Enhanced application performance as databases are hosted physically closer to user premises.
Operational Efficiency: Simplified database management allows teams to focus on development rather than maintenance.
Cost Management: Pay-as-you-go pricing model reduces financial surprises, aligning expenditure with actual usage.
Enhanced Security: Bolsters compliance and data protection with managed security protocols.

Industries like finance and healthcare implement Amazon RDS on Outposts to manage data-sensitive operations efficiently. Banks use it for secure, low-latency transaction processing while healthcare providers benefit from compliant and reliable patient data management.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MariaDB is an open source relational database created by the original founders of MySQL. It is considered one of the most popular and trusted database servers throughout the world. MariaDB is a valued component found in most cloud offerings and is the default in many Linux tools. It is also widely used by Wikipedia, WordPress, and Google, among other well-known sites. Maria DB easily melds data into concise information from a vast array of applications, such as banking, online shopping, websites, and more.

MariaDB was originally created to improve MySQL performance. It is the most widely chosen database server due to the solution being super fast, robust, user-friendly, and easily scalable. MariaDB also offers a substantial ecosystem of plugins, storage engines, and numerous other valuable tools that make it very attractive for a significant offering of use cases.

The solution’s newest functionalities include compatibility with Oracle Database and Temporal Data Tables, and advanced clustering with Galera Cluster 4, which make it easier for users to research data history from any point in the past. Additionally, the most recent versions include JSON and GIS features. MariaDB is committed to staying an open source solution.

MariaDB Features

More storage: MariaDB works with more storage engines than MySQL and most other database servers available. Some storage options include, but are not limited to ARCHIVE, MERGE, CSV, MEMORY, BLACKHOLE, MyISAM, ColumnStore, MyRocks, and Cassandra.
Super fast: MariaDB offers faster authentication checks. The FlushSSL permits SSL certificates to be reloaded without a server restart, resulting in huge time savings.
Improved testing: MariaDB offers an extending testing suite that runs faster and can test more than ever before. Bugs can be easily fixed and invalid tests removed.
Genuinely open source: Every code in MariaDB is GPL, LGPL, or BSD. Client libraries [for Windows (ODBC), Java (JDBC), or C] allow linking to closed source software. All fixed bug cases and development plans are completely public. MariaDB is a community-developed solution representing the true spirit of open source products.

Reviews from Real Users

Faustine C., Engineering Supervisor- Corporate Data Solutions and Services at TZ Telecoms Corporation, shares, “The software provides a lot of information on what is happening inside the database. For most performance parameters it is easy to know if something is not right in the configuration or optimization which helps engineers take remedial fine-tuning measures. For example, if the database is underperforming it is easy to know which performance parameter can be adjusted to handle the workload. It is difficult to troubleshoot database issues if many performance parameters can not be monitored or debugged which is the case with some database management systems. It provides great monitoring of data storage, processing, and performance stability which is really important for real-time data storage and processing. It's a user-friendly product.”

A PeerSpot user who is a Senior Engineer at a tech services company relates, “ The solution's high availability is its most valuable aspect. We have found the product to be stable and the initial setup is pretty simple. I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten. I'm very happy with it overall. I would recommend the solution to others. It's easy to find details about the product online and to learn about it.”

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Google, Wikipedia, Tencent, Verizon, DBS Bank, Deutsche Bank, Telefónica, Huatai Securities