Amazon Elastic Container Service vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform comparison

"The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to create revisions on the configurations."

"They handle the backup process quite well. They automatically encapsulate it, including container backups, without relying heavily on the client's involvement. This is a significant advantage compared to other providers where clients often need to manage the process more independently. It's a feature that I find suitable and beneficial."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service has multiple valuable features like load balancers and autoscalers."

"For Amazon EC2 Container Service, providing the ability for users to select specific processor, memory, disk, and interface types might be an ideal feature. But, the practicality of offering all possible physical combinations is nearly impossible due to the underlying physical machines. AWS and Azure organize options into groups based on essential components like powerful processors or critical interfaces, considering physical restrictions. While expanding these choices is conceivable, it may not be feasible from a financial and practical perspective. Customers generally comprehend this limitation, as even in their own data centers, exact physical machine requirements are often a result of a combination of factors such as price, availability, and new machine generations."

"It is a highly stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service is more stable."

"I like the tool's availability and automated scalability. I need to define the port numbers, and when I have a large load of requests, I can get automated scalability."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability."

"If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."

"The stability of the HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten."

"Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously."

"The solution's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We noticed a problem where our container doesn't always run, and the traffic in our secured license exceeds 100%, leading to increased container costs. We are working to understand and reduce this traffic to control costs."

"The solution needs to be more usable."

"The solution could provide more reliability."

"The solution can still be expensive, even with per-second billing."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service."

"I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten. It easily dies."

"HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is not user-friendly and has many parts that are more difficult than Cloudera. It is also a complex solution and has low features for data management."

"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."

"The platform is inexpensive."

"The product's pricing is good."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is worth the money."

"If you want to scale without the traditional methods, the solution is a bit cost-effective."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is an expensive solution."

"I rate the product's pricing an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"I don't exactly deal with the pricing. We have a separate Infra team that deals with the pricing. They are more into the scalability part. Based on our requirements, the pricing will increase. The automation teams will test some of the benefits to see how can we can optimize the cost. They'll have a security manager connection and some alerts based upon the usage to see how to reduce the building cost based upon the installations."

"The pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service is average."