Amazon Elastic Container Service vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform comparison

"The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 Container Service is its flexibility."

"Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address and resolve them. The product helps to have a global file system. Also, it helps in data replication from region to region."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service has multiple valuable features like load balancers and autoscalers."

"For Amazon EC2 Container Service, providing the ability for users to select specific processor, memory, disk, and interface types might be an ideal feature. But, the practicality of offering all possible physical combinations is nearly impossible due to the underlying physical machines. AWS and Azure organize options into groups based on essential components like powerful processors or critical interfaces, considering physical restrictions. While expanding these choices is conceivable, it may not be feasible from a financial and practical perspective. Customers generally comprehend this limitation, as even in their own data centers, exact physical machine requirements are often a result of a combination of factors such as price, availability, and new machine generations."

"For me, the best feature of ECS is Fargate because I don't have to manage anything. Instead, everything is managed by AWS and all I have to do, in essence, is configure my containers and deploy them."

"I like the tool's availability and automated scalability. I need to define the port numbers, and when I have a large load of requests, I can get automated scalability."

"Scalability and availability are the most valuable features of Amazon Elastic Container Service."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service serves the function it's supposed to serve."

"The stability of the HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten."

"If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."

"Billing is extremely complex."

"The solution could provide more reliability."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service should include more enterprise project management features, typically available in an OpenShift environment."

"In the next release, they could add some customization options for high computer workloads."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service’s initial setup is a bit difficult."

"Support could be better with response time and knowledge of staff."

"I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten. It easily dies."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service needs to improve the menu design. It needs to improve deployment with better documentation."

"HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is not user-friendly and has many parts that are more difficult than Cloudera. It is also a complex solution and has low features for data management."

"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."

"The platform is inexpensive."

"Amazon ECS is expensive."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is an expensive solution."

"If you want to scale without the traditional methods, the solution is a bit cost-effective."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service is an expensive solution."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service's price is good."

"There is no need to pay anything towards the licensing costs of Amazon EC2 Container Service."

"The pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service is average."