Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.0, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 21.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
Read 2 HPE Ezmeral Container Platform reviews
  • 581 Views
  • 363 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat OpenShift Container...
Read 50 Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reviews
  • 7,099 Views
  • 4,992 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,579 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
Ranking in Container Management
16th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat OpenShift Container...
Ranking in Container Management
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is 21.3%, up from 20.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management
 

Featured Reviews

CC
Effective cost management achieved with robust storage features but user experience and data management require improvements
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is not user-friendly and has many parts that are more difficult than Cloudera. It is also a complex solution and has low features for data management. For example, it cannot make a data catalog or process data lineage without third-party support, which increases the cost for development.
Read full review
Prasad Gupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient deployment with resource optimization and multi-region stability
There are several areas where OpenShift could improve. The interface has numerous UI bugs that need addressing. Furthermore, the latest version has deprecated the deployment config, which has its own advantages compared to the deployment container. Lastly, there is no built-in auto-scaling plugin at the OpenShift level; this needs to be addressed as it's available at the cloud provider level, like IBM Cloud.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"The stability of the HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten."
"The stack in the software supply chain is one of the main reasons that we use OpenShift. When I came to this company, we bought hardware from IBM named Bluemix, and they used ICP, which stands for IBM Cloud Private."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot to offer to developers, so they don't need to care about the infrastructure or basic setup of the containers, so you can just jump in and develop."
"The software is user-friendly and straightforward to use, which is favorable to a developer."
"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."
"OpenShift's core-based licensing model provides significant benefits regarding enterprise support and scalability."
"It’s user-friendly."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its scalability on demand, which allows for potentially lower costs, and Built-in resiliency."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros
 

Cons

"HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is not user-friendly and has many parts that are more difficult than Cloudera. It is also a complex solution and has low features for data management."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"There are some occasions when support from Red Hat is not what we expect; in instances of outages, it sometimes takes a substantial amount of time to resolve issues."
"Metrics monitoring feature needs improvement."
"It is difficult to deploy the OpenShift cluster in a bare-metal environment."
"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."
"We are not big customers of Red Hat, but sometimes, we have severe bugs. We are very innovative, and sometimes, we have to wait for a long time to get proper attention. Red Hat should improve on that."
"The product monitoring tool does not work for us."
"One challenge is that sometimes it may be difficult to find the answers to your questions if you are not a Red Hat customer."
"OpenShift Container Platform is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price is slightly on the higher side. It is something that can be worked on because most of the businesses now have margins."
"It depends on who you're talking to. For a large corporation, it is acceptable, other than the significant infrastructure requirements. For a small organization, it is in no way suitable, and we'd go for Amazon's container solution."
"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten. There is a subscription called OpenShift Plus, which offers additional features and products the vendor provides to complement the OpenShift Container Platform. These include ACM, Red Hat Quay, and Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation."
"The product is expensive."
"OpenShift Container Platform is highly-priced."
"I'm an architect, so I have no involvement in the pricing and licensing of the platform."
"We have to pay for the license."
"The pricing is a bit more expensive than expected."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE Ezmeral Container Platform?
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is not user-friendly and has many parts that are more difficult than Cloudera. It is also a complex solution and has low features for data management. For example, it...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for HPE Ezmeral Container Platform?
We want to replace the existing Cloudera data lake with HPE Ezmeral Container Platform ( /products/hpe-ezmeral-container-platform-reviews ).
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering HPE Ezmeral Container Platform?
I rate the HPE Ezmeral Container Platform seven out of ten because it has strong features for storage but lacks certain data management functionalities, requiring additional investments for third-p...
See all answers
Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?
Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...
See all answers
What do you like most about OpenShift Container Platform?
The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?
The current licensing cost for this solution is around $23,000 per year, per month. Regarding the current licensing cost, I would rate my satisfaction around seven or seven and a half; there's alwa...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Kubernetes vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform Logo
Kubernetes vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
Compared 17% of the time
Google Kubernetes Engine vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
Compared 11% of the time
VMware Tanzu Platform vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
Compared 11% of the time
More HPE Ezmeral Container Platform Competitors
Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 45% of the time
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 16% of the time
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 7% of the time
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Kubernetes vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
Kubernetes vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 2% of the time
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Container Management
June 2025
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform reportDownload HPE Ezmeral Container Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
June 2025
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reportDownload Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform product report
 

Overview

Accelerate your journey to hybrid cloud with the industry’s first enterprise-grade container software platform for cloud-native and distributed non-cloud native applications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

data iku, StreamSets, unravel
Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health
Buyer's Guide
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
June 2025
Free Report: HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.