Altair Monarch vs Bright Data comparison

"Altair Monarch is valuable because it allows a one-time setup for data extraction, making the process extremely easy with just a few clicks to get the output."

"Monarch lets you quickly extract in your preferred format."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the Proxy feature."

"The configuration was very easy, and the documentation was generally clear and direct."

"The platform's ease of use is a significant advantage. The web interface allows me to initiate queries easily and returns data in a structured format."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its mobile proxies."

"So it can handle, like, scalability and reliability during high data demands."

"The main use case for me is utilizing Bright Data's unblocking services that allow me to receive the whole protected web page via a simple API call."

"I think Bright Data is one of the best tools in the market. I've tested many, but Bright Data doesn't have much downtime. It's very fast compared to other proxy providers. Speed is their main USP, which is what they're selling it for. They're also good with security. The signal remains the same if something goes wrong with our internet connections or laptops. It doesn't affect the profiles or other things we're using. It just cuts off the internet connection directly. That's one of the best use cases."

"The most valuable feature of Bright Data is its proxy server, which effectively mimics real human behavior, avoiding complex navigation in the browser and reducing server load during scraping. This makes it easier to scrape data sets."

"I rate Altair Monarch seven out of 10 for affordability. Recently, the pricing model changed from end-user licensing to a concurrent licensing model."

"One area for product improvement might be the interface's complexity for students who need more coding experience."

"The solution's documentation and initial setup are longer than they should be."

"The main reason we left the product was that it was very expensive. They need to adjust their packages according to who uses them. They're very expensive compared to the market, probably because they believe they're the best. But it's too costly for companies like ours to continue with it. Another issue is that their support team is a bit slow."

"The solution could be improved by simplifying the setup process for new developers, as it can be complex for those without experience. Making manual settings easier and enabling a one-click setup would help bridge this gap. Everything else about Bright Data is fine."

"The dashboard was a bit too technical, and even with my technical experience, I had a hard time."

"The Datasheet API has unclear documentation."

"The solution's proxy selection process needs improvement. Incorporating country-specific proxies would be beneficial."

"The quality of the solution's technical support could be improved."

"Compared to other proxy servers, Bright Data's pricing is quite reasonable. I"

"The product pricing is reasonable for its features."

"The product has average pricing."

"I think the pricing is fair, if it is used in a business. The pricing model might need some adjustments if I am using it for a personal purpose, especially if I use it for a month or two."

"Bright Data is not an expensive tool compared to its competitors."

"Regarding pricing, we paid about 1000 dollars monthly for Bright Data. We started with their pay-as-you-go plan, which was expensive as we were charged per GB. Then we moved to the 500 dollar package, then the 1000 dollar package. We considered the 2000 dollar package they introduced recently."

"I don’t think the solution’s pricing is expensive."

"I got a type of free access, but it was through a referral from my friend. I got some credits free from the tool's end."