Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista and OpenText Network Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Management Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I really like Visual RAF. I use that a lot and then I use the up and down status reports because it'll send me emails and text messages when access points go up or down. That way, I'm aware of what's going on.""It is a good investment for features.""Being able to see the health of the network is most valuable. It is very strong in terms of stability and scalability. Their technical support is also good.""The most valuable feature of Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista is the monitoring of wired and wireless equipment.""The reports are good.""Network management solution that's very stable and scalable. It has a straightforward installation, fast technical support, and multiple features such as reporting, network health analysis, etc."

More Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista Pros →

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors.""We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

More OpenText Network Operations Management Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see a little better reporting, not reporting features, the report maker to be a little better.""Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista could improve by adding more cybersecurity features.""It needs to be infused with more artificial intelligence and machine learning.""Adding a reliable and proper heatmap for the access points would make this solution better.""They should add more security features.""The location of the WiFi connection should be available to all users."

More Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista Cons →

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective.""It may need a more customizable UI."

More OpenText Network Operations Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista is cheaper compared to other tools on the market. The license for this software is a one-time license only, so there is no renewal needed. It's a perpetual license."
  • "This is an open-source solution, we do not pay any money to use it."
  • "Its price is reasonable."
  • More Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
  • More OpenText Network Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:They should add more security features to the solution. Also, they should provide a secure platform to manage our networks.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to manage network connections for ethernet suites and wireless solutions.
    Top Answer:We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards.
    Top Answer:For small/medium networks, I'd recommend SolarWinds, Manage Engine, or PRTG. For vendor-based situations, Cisco Prime is best. With large-scale and multi-vendor scalability and security in mind, Micro… more »
    Top Answer:The NOM Platform already covers multiple vendors, and a lot of device types. This range of vendors and devices is increasing every quarter It may need a more customizable UI, which has already started… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    509
    Comparisons
    243
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    258
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    147
    Comparisons
    41
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    839
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista 8770, OmniVista 8770, OmniVista 2500, OmniVista Cirrus, Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista 2500, Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista Cirrus, OmniVista 2500 NMS, OmniVista 2500 VMM, OmniVista 3600,
    Micro Focus Network Operations Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    Get cohesive management and network-wide visibility with a full set of tools for converged campus networks and data centers.
    With this comprehensive and powerful network management tool, you’ll benefit from a full set of components for infrastructure and device configuration, monitoring, backup, scheduling, security, alerts, quarantine, troubleshooting, downtime resolution, and overall management.

    Along with making day-to-day network operations more efficient, the Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista 2500 Network Management System (NMS) provides all the network management tools and reports you need to track and achieve your business goals.

    Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

    Sample Customers
    Blickle and Scherer, Loughborough University, CSF Inox, Caritas Speyer
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Educational Organization8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise59%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista is ranked 18th in Network Management Applications with 6 reviews while OpenText Network Operations Management is ranked 11th in Network Management Applications with 2 reviews. Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista is rated 9.0, while OpenText Network Operations Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista writes "Helpful support, useful monitoring, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Operations Management writes "Good integration capabilities, good reliability, and is user-friendly". Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, Alcatel-Lucent ClearPass, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager and Aruba Airwave, whereas OpenText Network Operations Management is most compared with . See our Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

    See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

    We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.